ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 November 2012, 03:05 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 42
|
1655 with Jubilee bracelet
Was the 1655 ever offered with the Jubilee bracelet? If I'm going for this look, which Jubilee and endlink with fit the 1655 case? Thanks!
|
6 November 2012, 03:20 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Mario
Location: USA / NZ
Watch: All sorts
Posts: 799
|
|
6 November 2012, 03:47 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
isn't it like a 1675 GMT case?
|
6 November 2012, 03:53 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 42
|
It's slightly different in terms of thickness.
http://rolex.watchprosite.com/?show=...95823&msid=&s= |
6 November 2012, 05:35 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
but close enough to fit end-links and bracelet, I'd imagine... Subs and GMTs both were supplied on 7206, for example.
|
6 November 2012, 05:44 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
|
You are correct, many people have " swapped " cases from 1675s to 1655s in order to dupe people, i know of one, which, when sent to Rolex for a service, was refused on those grounds, and the owner was in his words " lucky to get his watch back ".
ps. He had bought the watch in good faith. |
6 November 2012, 06:11 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
very 1982!
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
6 November 2012, 06:12 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
reminds me of a pro plonger on a beads of rice
|
6 November 2012, 11:59 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 42
|
What is the correct Jubilee bracelet and endlink combination for 1675 GMT?
|
7 November 2012, 12:11 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
definitely like the oyster better, to each his own..
|
7 November 2012, 12:19 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
|
Quote:
|
|
7 November 2012, 02:49 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 42
|
|
4 January 2019, 04:54 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
I'm interested in doing something like this for my 1655. any one have the definitive part numbers need to do so? Thanks!
|
4 January 2019, 05:44 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,061
|
back in the day you could get pretty much whichever bracelet you liked fitted at the AD
|
4 January 2019, 09:14 AM | #15 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Quote:
The 62510H predecessor will also work which is a Swiss made 6251 Jubilee with open or rolled links. End links are 50 with the bracelet having a total of 22 links plus end links. The USA oval-link bracelet will also work with 20mm end links. (The end links do not have a number except for some of the early ones which can be found with 50 stamped on the left ear of the end link.) This bracelet also has 22 links.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
4 January 2019, 10:12 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Canada
Watch: 1655 1675 5513
Posts: 8
|
Solid pairing - Gives the Explorer a cool 70's vibe
|
4 January 2019, 10:23 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
|
mine came with a jubilee with the period correct date stamp and 550 ends i believe. The single owner i bought it from said that was how it was displayed. I think the 50 stamps on the jubilees came a little after the mid 80s when the 1655s were last sold if i recall correctly. The bracelet was in pieces when i bought the watch. had to go back to MYoung for repair. The guy wore the sh*t out of it. It was original to the watch.
So given that the AD would do whatever they wanted and we always try to put Rolex in a rule box, i would say that yes, you could get it with a jubilee as well as an oyster. No problem. Drives the rules guys crazy but it did occur back then. Mine is proof of it. Mine is a 6MM serial i believe. |
4 January 2019, 12:11 PM | #19 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Quote:
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
4 January 2019, 01:13 PM | #20 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
|
|
8 January 2019, 02:31 PM | #21 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Quote:
|
|
28 August 2020, 12:36 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Hong kong
Watch: Rolex Hulk
Posts: 22
|
Wow
|
28 August 2020, 02:27 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
|
1655 is noticeably thicker than the 1675....I have owned multiples of both....not to hijack the thread but is that considered a service bezel???
|
28 August 2020, 03:19 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
|
I'd like to see more photos, but I would say Mk 4 bezel. The loops in the 6s are more elongated in the service bezel IMO.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
23 September 2020, 01:15 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Real Name: Kaspar
Location: Copenhagen, DK
Watch: lv 16610
Posts: 26
|
Very cool!
|
2 October 2020, 08:42 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Real Name: Chris Nguyen
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 204
|
I’ve seen plenty of original 1655s come with a jubilee. Back in the day, you had your options of which bracelet you wanted and the bracelet wouldn’t actually be paired with the watch many times until the sale. Especially with 1655s which were not very popular at the time and sat in stores sometimes for several years, the bracelet date code will more often match the date of sale, not the date of watch production. I’ve seen a 1978 1655 with papers that show the date of sale in 1982 and had a G clasp code.
To make a long story short, a 1655 is totally fine on a jubilee. I think it actually looks great and want to get one for mine as well to switch out every so often. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.