ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 November 2012, 05:40 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC, Daytona
Posts: 588
|
Dress Watch: Daytona SS or Reverso 976
Anyone here ever gave thoughts to this? Which of these would would be a better looking piece for primarily office/dress and sport casual secondary duties. In my case the SubC and Ex42 polar takes care of most scenario and i'm pondering a 3rd piece to fill in the gaps.
Like i mentioned before i'm just curious and appreciate your thoughts on this |
16 November 2012, 05:50 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
The Reverso is the formal option between the two. The Daytona is a sport chronograph.
|
16 November 2012, 07:37 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
|
I love them both...my JLC is a 986
__________________
'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill |
16 November 2012, 08:18 PM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC, Daytona
Posts: 588
|
Quote:
|
|
16 November 2012, 08:39 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Watch: SD / LV / Daytona
Posts: 2,089
|
The Reverso is more dressy.
Personally my SS Daytona substitutes as my "dress" watch. |
16 November 2012, 08:39 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
|
Quote:
If its a hot day or an active day, it wont be the Reverso purely due to the sweat under strap issue for me. Daytona will hold its value better, although the Reverso is a classic and not as commonly seen in the wild. Also as all my other watches are "sports" watches with bracelets opted for the Reverso as a dress/boardroom piece. JLCs really are special !
__________________
'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill |
|
16 November 2012, 09:58 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hudson Ohio
Posts: 3,564
|
|
16 November 2012, 10:06 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Ralf
Location: FL.
Watch: enthusiast
Posts: 502
|
They are both wonderful. If you are looking for a dress watch, Reverso.
|
16 November 2012, 10:15 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
I have both and wear both equally
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
16 November 2012, 10:16 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Daytona for me.
|
16 November 2012, 10:34 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
For a dress watch: JlC!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
16 November 2012, 10:44 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Reverso would be the only choice for dress out of those two.
|
16 November 2012, 11:04 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Sac Valley, CA US
Watch: Patek 5980/1A
Posts: 2,860
|
Definitely JLC for dress watch.
|
16 November 2012, 11:05 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 446
|
Of the two, I would say the Reverso. While some may be dressier than others, I wouldn't consider any current Rolex Professional series watch to be dressy.
__________________
"Onto his wrist he slipped his steel Rolex Oyster Perpetual, the 34mm model, the date window its only complication; Bond did not need to know the phases of the moon or the exact moment of high tide at Southampton. And he suspected very few people did." |
16 November 2012, 11:09 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
Reverso 976 for sure
Daytona is a sports watch. |
17 November 2012, 12:01 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I've worn both formally but the Reverso looks better.
|
17 November 2012, 12:15 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Christiaan
Location: Fort Mill, SC
Watch: 67' Breitling Navi
Posts: 1,617
|
Jlc
__________________
"Give me the luxuries of life and I will willingly do without the necessities" Frank Lloyd Wright. "For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward. For there you have been and there you will long to return." DaVinci |
17 November 2012, 12:32 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1,515
|
The JLC is a more formal watch. It would also give you more variety in your collection and better contrast against the two Rolex's.
I have a JLC Reverso myself and along with the Sub it forms the perfect pairing. No occasion exists that would leave me unsure which watch to wear. If I owned a Daytona it would be smart casual. It would go really well with a smart jumper and dark jeans. For the occasions you mentioned Reverso is the better option but the Daytona is good as well. |
17 November 2012, 01:07 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
|
Def Daytona for me.
|
17 November 2012, 08:14 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Watch: Daytona 116519
Posts: 58
|
Daytona for me!
|
17 November 2012, 08:19 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Watch: GMT-II Pepsi
Posts: 1,051
|
JLC is more formal. I'm looking into getting one to complement my Pepsi GMT II.
__________________
Lug hole loyalist! |
17 November 2012, 09:24 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC, Daytona
Posts: 588
|
Wow alot of JLC reverso love here. Some nice wrist shots there. I'm still on the fence for now but thanks for the feedback guys. Did manage to drop by the AD today and if you guys don't mind i'll post some pics?
|
17 November 2012, 09:30 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Quote:
Still get what you like/want. Daytona will do fine as a dress watch.
__________________
|
|
17 November 2012, 09:30 PM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC, Daytona
Posts: 588
|
No 116520 so this will have to do
But i must add that lucky me it didn't do much for me. |
17 November 2012, 09:32 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: PP 5320G
Posts: 1,259
|
Jlc
|
18 November 2012, 12:52 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC, Daytona
Posts: 588
|
More shots from my day out at the AD
|
18 November 2012, 04:41 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Daytona
|
18 November 2012, 05:33 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Watch: Submariner LV
Posts: 580
|
Like the Green on that Hulk..and the Blue one glad I wasn’t in your chair or both would have come home with me ..good luck and happy hunting
|
18 November 2012, 05:58 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern CA.
Watch: JLC~AP~RLX~PAM~UN
Posts: 360
|
For diversification purposes in your collection I like the JLC reverso.
But a white dial ss daytona is as neutral as you can get - it will work well with all of your clothing. Most reversos in the current line up have either a dark brown or black strap - not as 'neutral' If you have the opposite colored suit or shirt. |
18 November 2012, 08:46 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,500
|
For my style, the Daytona is dressy enough though the JLC is more fitting in that catagory.
__________________
Time and tide wait for no man. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.