ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 November 2012, 07:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
Cyclops removal opinions wanted
Cyclops removal on a late Sports model Rolex Sub date /GMTll /EXP ll ..good idea ..bad idea ..how much does it effect resale price and desirability ?All opinions would be greatly appreciated.
|
29 November 2012, 08:08 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Fran
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 385
|
Why even think of doing it..I say leave it alone as it is part of the watch that makes it what it is.
|
29 November 2012, 08:13 AM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: NY
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 1,642
|
Quote:
I say go for it! Many will say its iconic and a symbol of Rolex - blah blah blah - but its YOUR watch. Do to it as you please...! My sub is engraved...some will say even that is sacrilege. |
|
29 November 2012, 08:17 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: David Farkas
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 116610, 5712/1A
Posts: 8,182
|
heat up the cyclops and it will come unglued and come off easily
Also for the record Steve Wynn takes all of the cyclops' off his rolexes and he is nearly blind kinda of ironic ha |
29 November 2012, 08:20 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
A guy on here called Jolu posted a video of him removing the cyclops of his Exp II with the aid of a knife, a hammer and a bottle of aquavit!
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
29 November 2012, 08:37 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Angelo, TX
Watch: Rlx,Omega,JLC,Breg
Posts: 1,699
|
Some people prefer it...but I am at the opposite end of the spectrum on this one. Just like some go ahead and brush the polished center links...it's your watch so enjoy it how you like.
__________________
|
29 November 2012, 08:39 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: SoCal/Philippines
Watch: 126334
Posts: 253
|
The results of removing the cyclops lens from a GMT2C, as previously posted on TRF. I don't know when Rolex began applying the anti-reflective coating on the GMT models, but thought I'd post this as a reminder. YMMV.....
|
29 November 2012, 08:47 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Fran
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 385
|
Yes, good post. That does not look good at all with it removed.
|
29 November 2012, 08:49 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Tommy
Location: New jersey
Watch: Rolex 16610
Posts: 457
|
Buy a sea dweller if u don't like the cyclops, that goofy thing on crystal is what makes a Rolex a Rolex! But it's you're watch so u gotta do what makes u happy!
|
29 November 2012, 08:50 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Fran
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 385
|
Well if Steve is doing it, then I should as well. HAHA Just don't see the need to remove it, looks funny, but it is his watch.
|
29 November 2012, 09:04 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Heath
Location: Lawrenceburg KY
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 3,982
|
I would rather leave it the way it comes from Rolex. It is your watch though, do what makes you happy.
__________________
“You may delay, but time will not.” ― Benjamin Franklin |
29 November 2012, 09:07 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
I like the Cyclops. I'm just wondering if removing one effects value and resale?
|
29 November 2012, 09:10 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: USA
Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C
Posts: 1,443
|
Interesting photo. I'm wondering if the ar coating left behind (I'm assuming that's what we're seeing anyway) could be fairly easily removed as well. I know a lot of Omega Planet Ocean and Breitling owners have successfully nixed the outer ar coating from their crystals.
|
29 November 2012, 09:15 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
|
Let me know if you remove the cyclops and send it to me. After adding one to my THC I've been bombarded with inquiries about where to get one to add to theirs.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
29 November 2012, 09:26 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
I like my cyclops. Heck, it's part of the watch.
|
29 November 2012, 09:29 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
|
I like my cyclops too, but its your watch after all !
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
29 November 2012, 09:49 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Vacheron Overseas
Posts: 297
|
I don't like the cyclops, but that's why I ended up with the 114060. I think it will however affect resale, and desirability, since any non factory-spec modification decreases the pool of potential buyers you'll have.
__________________
Patek Philippe Calatrava 5119J; Vacheron Constantin Overseas; Jaeger-LeCoultre Grande Reverso Duo; Rolex Submariner 114060; Baume and Mercier Hampton Annual Calendar; Tudor Heritage Black Bay. |
29 November 2012, 09:55 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
I like & need my cyclops..
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
29 November 2012, 10:15 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
It is ultimately your choice, but to me the Cyclops is what makes the Rolex unique. It's kinda like the design team stood around, looking at the finished product and said, "Well, it looks like were done!" Someone walking by said, "Why is the date so small, make it bigger? Interesting though, do you all think Rolex added the Cyclops "targeting" the older population (kinda like when bi-focals where the only option you had when you needed reading glasses)? This has likely been answered before, but please someone clue me in.
|
29 November 2012, 12:16 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
|
Obviously it's your watch to do what you like, but I would not recommend it.
-Eddie
__________________
|
29 November 2012, 12:43 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Shane
Location: Minnesota
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,125
|
During a brief time of madness I considered removing mine using that you tube video. I called my AD and asked that question about the warranty and was told by her that it would unquestionably void the warranty as well as void if I had the caseback engraved somewhere as Rolex would not do it.
Last edited by bridgs; 29 November 2012 at 12:45 PM.. Reason: addition |
29 November 2012, 01:03 PM | #22 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,472
|
Like the cyclops... I even like it added on to the Tudor!
|
29 November 2012, 01:45 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Rod
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: YG DD 18238
Posts: 1,540
|
Message from the '80's, "Just say no!"
__________________
I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made. -Franklin D. Roosevelt |
29 November 2012, 01:47 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Hamilton, MI USA
Watch: My beloved TT DJ
Posts: 3,831
|
Don't do it...
__________________
My Trusty TT DJ |
29 November 2012, 03:20 PM | #25 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
Quote:
We can't discuss fake Rolex watches here, PVD ones are frowned upon......cyclop-less Rolex watches is sacrilege! Mods please lock this thread, doing away w/ the cyclops, bah humbug, this should be a bannable act.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
30 November 2012, 07:06 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jo
Location: Norway
Watch: Explorer I/II
Posts: 660
|
Quote:
AR coating is not that hard to remove, but as it's on the inside you need to be quite handy. Good luck to the OP! :)
__________________
“I have never been lost, but I will admit to being confused for several weeks” - Daniel Boone - |
|
30 November 2012, 08:48 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 70
|
I think in an old thread someone showed pictures of how the cyclops fell off when he dropped his watch on the floor - so you could try dropping your watch onto a concrete floor repeatedly to remove your cyclops. ( Just kidding - please do not do this ).
A better idea might be to replace the crystal, rather than trying to remove the cyclops. An even better idea would be to leave this iconic design alone, and buy a ( no date ) Submariner, or a Seadweller if you really don't like the cyclops. |
30 November 2012, 08:54 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
It's not something that I would do.
|
30 November 2012, 08:58 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Since you can replace the crystal for a few hundred I would say it doesn't effect the price anymore than a new crystal would cost.
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.