ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

katana · 10 December 2012, 02:47 AM

Hello, bought a Submariner, a few months ago. At the clock there was a 93,150 bracelets with letter (B) is also on the end pieces 580. Stamped PATENTED & REGISTERED
SWISS MADE ROLEX Steelnox B

I'm really bad in photography, but tried, still take some pictures ..! The question is, do YOU think, that is a genuine Submariner bracelet of 1977 (B)??? Will try tomorrow to take photos of the day's light.

Thank you..!!!!!

katana · 10 December 2012, 02:50 AM

The pictures look even worse now than in my mobile, now when they are enlarged ..! New pictures tomorrow.

joseluu · 10 December 2012, 04:19 AM

We need those pictures badly.

Grissom · 10 December 2012, 05:16 AM

Do YOU think it is right? And if not, why not. Out of curiosity, why attempt to figure this out now, rather than before buying it? Does it seem significantly different in your hands now that you own it, versus before you bought it, and if so, how?

crowncollection · 10 December 2012, 07:18 AM

can't authenticate from those photos, but the band has had a repair and some permanent links removed and rejoined to a link that is smaller,, hence the size variation, i hope you did not pay that much ?

10 December 2012, 02:47 AM	#1
katana "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Paradis Location: Sweden Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust Posts: 885	Original or Fake 93150 bracelet? Hello, bought a Submariner, a few months ago. At the clock there was a 93,150 bracelets with letter (B) is also on the end pieces 580. Stamped PATENTED & REGISTERED SWISS MADE ROLEX Steelnox B I'm really bad in photography, but tried, still take some pictures ..! The question is, do YOU think, that is a genuine Submariner bracelet of 1977 (B)??? Will try tomorrow to take photos of the day's light. Thank you..!!!!! Attached Images __________________

10 December 2012, 02:50 AM	#2
katana "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Paradis Location: Sweden Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust Posts: 885	The pictures look even worse now than in my mobile, now when they are enlarged ..! New pictures tomorrow. __________________

10 December 2012, 05:16 AM	#4
Grissom "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Nathan Location: US, Latin America Watch: GMT IIc 18K/SS Posts: 3,349	Do YOU think it is right? And if not, why not. Out of curiosity, why attempt to figure this out now, rather than before buying it? Does it seem significantly different in your hands now that you own it, versus before you bought it, and if so, how? __________________ *(Member NAWCC since 1976)* 116713LN GMT-IIc 18k/SS (Z) + 116520 SS Daytona (M) + 16700 GMT Master (A) + 16610LV Submariner (V) + 16600 Sea Dweller (Z) + 116400 Milgauss White Dial (V) + 70330N Tudor Heritage Chronograph Grey w/Black Sub Dials (J) + 5513 Submariner Serif Dial (5.2 Mil) Who else needs an Intervention? (109 297) (137 237) (73 115) (221) (23) (56) (229) P-Club Member #5 RIP JJ Irani - TRF Legend

10 December 2012, 07:18 AM	#5
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	can't authenticate from those photos, but the band has had a repair and some permanent links removed and rejoined to a link that is smaller,, hence the size variation, i hope you did not pay that much ? __________________ watches many

10 December 2012, 04:19 AM	#3
joseluu "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Madrid (Spain) Posts: 702	We need those pictures badly.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)