ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 December 2012, 06:27 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
The Hobbit: A Disappointed Journey
First of all I did not watch this movie as a Lord of the ring fan (I have never watched any of the LOTR movies). I decided to watch this simply to experience the 3D and the highly raved high frame rate (HFR) in which it was filmed (twice the frame rate of a typical film).
I have to say it is an absolute disappointment both with the movie itself and the 3D + HFR effects. I was instantly disappointed at the very first frame of the movie realising that the film has hit itself in the foot with the HFR, it was so clear in definition that it looked like a TV show rather than a movie film I was falling asleep during the first 1/4 of the film before any action scene came out, I barely woke up when the actions started anyway...it was that bad. The character's development and acting seems very fake & artificial which is not easy to achieve seeing its already a fake aka fantasy flim. Overall its a film that tries-too-hard and if I can turn back the time I would not spend a single dime watching it in the cinema BTW the ending is preparing itself for the next instalment. If you do decide to go to the movie simply to enjoy a 3D experience with interesting storyline in a fascinating film I recommend watching Disney's animation Wreck-it-Ralph. I am still overwhelmed by this animation, it is the best animation flim I have watched |
30 December 2012, 07:38 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Wayne
Location: California
Watch: Rolex, PAM
Posts: 3,302
|
Huh, I have enjoyed all of the LOTR movies and books and I didn't think they did a bad job with the hobbit. Just a little annoyed they broke it into 3 parts.
|
31 December 2012, 01:31 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 3,289
|
I thought it was fine. Once my brain adjusted to the 3d I started watching the film and not the effects. That's when I really started to enjoy it. Just my $.02.
|
31 December 2012, 01:34 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
I liked it!
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
31 December 2012, 01:47 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
The Hobbit is the slimmest book in the saga of LOTR. Cutting it into 3 parts means that a lot of the movie (and the two that follow) is going to be slow and boring as filler is needed to rack up all that screen time. Peter Jackson did the story a disservice by succumbing to marketing forces. He chose the dollar over the story, and I thought he was a bit more of a Tolkien fan to do that.
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
31 December 2012, 03:24 PM | #6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Quote:
|
|
1 January 2013, 01:20 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,215
|
its funny because the cinema owners hate these long films because it cuts down on the number of showings per day.
|
31 December 2012, 06:34 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
Since the advent of 3-D, the main problem has been that the effect itself was expected to carry the film, while all the elements of good cinema were ignored or given short shrift.
With the advent of truly convincing special effects, there have been no shortage of films that rely mostly on those effects to the near exclusion of what it takes to produce good cinema. Combine modern 3-D, HFR, and an adaptation of a wildly popular book series and eventually some Hollywood types will take the avenue of least resistance to make the most money possible.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
31 December 2012, 07:21 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
I enjoyed the film, I look forward to the next one.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
31 December 2012, 07:27 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,215
|
they screwed up the movies with deus ex machina like the constant intervention of the eagles etc.
plus watching people run around the New Zealand landscape gets a bit boring. |
31 December 2012, 09:44 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
|
I enjoyed it as I didn't expect anything
Watched it in 2D |
31 December 2012, 10:36 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
|
Very disappointed. As others have mentioned it never should have been broken into three parts. Absurd IMHO.
|
31 December 2012, 11:58 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
I liked it, but it was all filler. It should have been one film o maybe 3.5 hours. I guess they will deal with Smaug in the next one. It looks like they are already near the mountain, so they won't meet Beorn. Then the final battle in the last.
|
1 January 2013, 03:04 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
|
I quite enjoyed it
|
1 January 2013, 03:11 AM | #15 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
Boring. Disappointing. Lack of character development. Ho Hum.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.