The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 December 2007, 08:29 PM   #1
time
"TRF" Member
 
time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
Why "all" want big watches???

Hi!

Maybe I am a conservative guy.... to be >30years....

Why do "all" teenagers wear ~45mm big bling bling watches now? Now, spec. girls?

I think the Rolex models define a very good standard. 32mm for ladies, 34mm "Boy", 36mm for men daily and 40mm for men for sport/casual.

I think (my op.) people wear a big watch (>43mm) just to "show"...Or is it? What is the point of super large watches? Hmmm

I wear Rolex and JeagerLeC daily - I never show my watch to everyone... It is under my shirt all the time. Fat watch prevents you to have it under your shirt.... My girl friend says she will never wear a large men watch.
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour....
time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 09:32 PM   #2
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
I don't want a big watch anymore. I had a few 44mm Panerai through out the years and I got tired of the large size on my relatively thin 6 3/4" wrists. I am happy with ~40mm max.
walds11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 09:42 PM   #3
time
"TRF" Member
 
time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
Me too. Finally, one agrees with me. I think 40mm is a nice and comfortable size...
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour....
time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 09:47 PM   #4
blueface
"TRF" Member
 
blueface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: USA
Watch: DJ, DD, SUB
Posts: 487
I'm happy with my two 36mm's.
__________________
TT Datejust 16233 (T) SOLD
YG Daydate 11833 (K
SS Sub Date 16610 (M). SOLD
TT Blue Sub Date 116613LB (Random, 2018?)
blueface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 09:53 PM   #5
gaopa
"TRF" Member
 
gaopa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ..
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 1,820
I agree.... 40mm's is the limit for me...
gaopa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 10:27 PM   #6
USMCsilver
"TRF" Member
 
USMCsilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Sterling
Location: Middle of SC
Watch: Anniv. GMT II
Posts: 908
People are getting fatter, you haven't heard?

This way, a bigger watch covers the wrist better.
__________________
The Original USMCsilver©
~~><~~
USMCsilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 10:49 PM   #7
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
Actually, the part of the world where big watches are really being sold, and the majority of mechanical watches are being sold, is a part of the world where on average the body size and other parts are smaller than in America. The 444 crowd (as Thai's refer to a rival group from Asia).

People are getting fatter, you haven't heard?

This way, a bigger watch covers the wrist better.


But, I think you just described me USMC!! LOL LOL Guess I need to go shop for a Panerai!!! LOL LOL
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 10:51 PM   #8
USMCsilver
"TRF" Member
 
USMCsilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Sterling
Location: Middle of SC
Watch: Anniv. GMT II
Posts: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by leopardprey View Post
Actually, the part of the world where big watches are really being sold, and the majority of mechanical watches are being sold, is a part of the world where on average the body size and other parts are smaller than in America. The 444 crowd.
I know, I know -- it's mostly Europe's fault; the above was more of a joke because American's are becoming a bunch of pudgy fat-asses. I'll put the blame on the French (just because I can)!
__________________
The Original USMCsilver©
~~><~~
USMCsilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 10:54 PM   #9
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
YES, I WILL BLAME THE FRENCH ALSO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn French!!!!!


(Because I am here in Phnom Penh and I just got back from a French Restuarant where I gourged myself with some of the best French Food and Wine have ever had!!!!!! Man, those French know how to cook!!!)
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 11:31 PM   #10
time
"TRF" Member
 
time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by leopardprey View Post
YES, I WILL BLAME THE FRENCH ALSO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn French!!!!!


(Because I am here in Phnom Penh and I just got back from a French Restuarant where I gourged myself with some of the best French Food and Wine have ever had!!!!!! Man, those French know how to cook!!!)
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour....
time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 11:35 PM   #11
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
I think those with XL watches are compensating. For what I don't know.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2007, 11:37 PM   #12
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
That is why I am buying a 34mm Air King.
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 12:06 AM   #13
Randy
"TRF" Member
 
Randy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
Most of the guys I see wearing big blingy watches are very young 20's. Rappers, Professional athletes, etc. They also might have pants half hanging off there arse! No disrespect to Paneri owners! I,m quite content with 40mm!
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 12:12 AM   #14
slojoh
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: az
Posts: 283
40 mm is big enough
slojoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 12:29 AM   #15
Mort
"TRF" Member
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,001
Even though the watches are all going huge and in some cases you have no choice in size for a particular model, I think it should depend on what looks best for your wrist size. A 300lb man with 10" wrist might look better with a 44-48 mm watch on than a 34mm.

I still believe that the huge craze will fade down the line. I am not talking about sport watches that run to 42mm, I think the fad of the 44 to 50 mm will go out of style as the "bling/hip hop" thing fades. Just my 2c
Mort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 12:45 AM   #16
time
"TRF" Member
 
time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
Yes!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mort View Post
Even though the watches are all going huge and in some cases you have no choice in size for a particular model, I think it should depend on what looks best for your wrist size. A 300lb man with 10" wrist might look better with a 44-48 mm watch on than a 34mm.

I still believe that the huge craze will fade down the line. I am not talking about sport watches that run to 42mm, I think the fad of the 44 to 50 mm will go out of style as the "bling/hip hop" thing fades. Just my 2c



I hope so...I will made me very glad

I hate those fat bling bling things people are wearing and SHOWING around in the street... I hope those "things" and this trend became "ugh"... and I hope people go back to the more elegance watch style as before. No more big, bling and orange watches on the men AND lady watches.

I finally find someone (really hard to find people at my age these days - beside my girl friend and my family) that understands that waches are not for showing on the street and "the bigger the better, the more bling the better". I miss perfect style!
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour....
time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 01:05 AM   #17
Texsubmariner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
Even within Rolex, the new models have larger bezels. Take the new GMT IIc, it definitely looks bigger than the other 40 mm models. This will probaby carry over to the other models when they get updated. I think it is the trend nowadays, prob. started by rap stars and celebs..
Texsubmariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 01:06 AM   #18
Paulie
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Watch: GMTII and OP!
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Pierce View Post
I think those with XL watches are compensating. For what I don't know.
dP
It's only "two mm" more than the other. But it looks huge in the pic or on the wrist. But not overly larger than say a U-Boat or one of those Russian divers that's more a clock than a wrist watch.



And I am compensating... for the fact that Rolex doesn't use the Co-Axial escapement.
__________________
Paulie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 01:17 AM   #19
time
"TRF" Member
 
time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
The GMT looks much better on your wrist...
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour....
time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 01:29 AM   #20
Jerry B
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York
Watch: Pepsi,LV,SSDJ
Posts: 343
40 mm is my limit.

I think the big watch craze is partly due to a reaction with the electric high tech world, where smaller is better. To have a big analog watch, with an automatic movement kind of brings some comfort to all of the sterile high tech gadgets. Learning how to tell time is a universal form of communication, that we all learn as kids. usually on an analog clock. The big watches we are seeing, brings us back to this experience .

Just my two cents, I may be completely
Jerry B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 01:31 AM   #21
Paulie
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Watch: GMTII and OP!
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by time View Post
The GMT looks much better on your wrist...
Of course it does, the Omega is on my hand.

I'll see about doing a reverse shot some time.
__________________
Paulie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 01:36 AM   #22
GoldenBear
"TRF" Member
 
GoldenBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,480
It's also a style, like suits and ties, (if any of you wear suits). Lapels widen and narrow as do ties. Everything is getting smaller (see: Moore's Law) law), people want bigger watches to compensate for everything shrinking.
__________________
____________________________________________
Rolex Blue TT Submariner
Rolex SS Submariner
Breitling Emergency Mission

**They are just watches, wear 'em.**
____________________________________________
GoldenBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 01:36 AM   #23
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
I am liking bigger watches too

7 years ago, when I bought my SMP, I thought the full-size was too big, so I went mid-size. Now that I am getting a 16613, I am enjoying the larger size. Go figure!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 01:41 AM   #24
bran
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Bran
Location: Walnut Cove, NC
Posts: 225
Yep...40mm is the upper limit for me
bran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 01:50 AM   #25
puffnmo
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 848
Guys - why so serious? The reason watches have gotten so much bigger IMO is because men began to discover that a watch does not have to be just a thing on your wrist to tell time. They can be fun!!!

Guys have way fewer options than women as far as dress and appearance. An interesting watch can be a personal accent that says something about us.

Wearing a big blingy watch does not always mean the guy is an a-hole trying to show off. Maybe he just enjoys wearing it, looking at it and enjoying it. Just look at this board. A bunch of really great guys having fun with shared interest in a hobby.

I like 36 mm, 40 mm, and 44 mm, and wear them all at different times. For me, this is where the fun is, and no hard and fast rules apply. Cheers, Larry.
puffnmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 02:21 AM   #26
Thai
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: TX
Watch: Rolex Yacht-Master
Posts: 149
Great! My YM midsize is 35 mm...so, that makes me a "boyz-to-men" group! My wrist size is 6-6.25...there is no way a 40mm watch is gonna look right. Even my Omega deville at 37.5 mm look kinda on the edge of big.

Hopefully, for my sake, the trend will go backwards to girly watches!
Thai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 02:46 AM   #27
hdman1216
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Don
Location: Leawood, KS
Watch: Zenith Defy Open
Posts: 38
Big Watches

Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnmo View Post
Guys - why so serious? The reason watches have gotten so much bigger IMO is because men began to discover that a watch does not have to be just a thing on your wrist to tell time. They can be fun!!!

Guys have way fewer options than women as far as dress and appearance. An interesting watch can be a personal accent that says something about us.

Wearing a big blingy watch does not always mean the guy is an a-hole trying to show off. Maybe he just enjoys wearing it, looking at it and enjoying it. Just look at this board. A bunch of really great guys having fun with shared interest in a hobby.

I like 36 mm, 40 mm, and 44 mm, and wear them all at different times. For me, this is where the fun is, and no hard and fast rules apply. Cheers, Larry.
AT LAST, SOMEONE MAKES SOME SENSE

I am 61 Y.O. and have, and also wear on a regular basis, watches from 36mm (Vintage Rolex) to 50mm (Bell and Ross Br01-97) with a few in between.
hdman1216 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 02:58 AM   #28
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry B View Post
40 mm is my limit.

I think the big watch craze is partly due to a reaction with the electric high tech world, where smaller is better. To have a big analog watch, with an automatic movement kind of brings some comfort to all of the sterile high tech gadgets. Learning how to tell time is a universal form of communication, that we all learn as kids. usually on an analog clock. The big watches we are seeing, brings us back to this experience .

Just my two cents, I may be completely
Agreed, Jerry. 40 mm is PERFECT for my wrist.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 03:07 AM   #29
DS/B MINI S
"TRF" Member
 
DS/B MINI S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Charlotte NC
Watch: SD & Exp II
Posts: 961
IMHO, big watches look better...at least on me. Most of my watches are in the 40-42mm range. I do have a couple of larger watches (Glycine KMU 48 and Citizen Ecozilla) that I wear as "beater" watches. The Ecozilla is bigger, but the Glycine looks bigger because it is all dial (no bezel).
I'd love to have a Datejust, but I just can't get over the 36mm case size. My wrist is between 7 3/4" and 8" and the DJ looks like a ladies watch on my wrist (IMO). I figured instead of the DJ, I'd pick up the Aqua Terra (42mm) sometime down the line.
Of course, I'm currently saving for a PAM 177 or 88, so take my input with a grain of salt...
__________________
16600 Sea-Dweller
16570 Explorer II (White Dial)
DS/B MINI S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 03:19 AM   #30
Jocke
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Jocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
I like big ones too.





Jocke
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish.

What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom?

Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional
photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute.
Jocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.