ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: SubC TT V GMTC TT | |||
SubC TT | 70 | 46.67% | |
GMTC TT | 80 | 53.33% | |
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
29 January 2013, 01:01 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
SubC TT v GMTC TT
Im looking at buying a TT Rolex and was initially thinking of the GMTc TT as its a pilots watch and better lends itself to gold than a diver, but after trying on this and the black Subc TT I am now torn as they both look great. So which would you choose, putting function aside as I wont use either watch's functions very often, and which watch just simply appeals to you more.
|
29 January 2013, 01:05 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I'm a bigger GMT fan but between these I'd pick the Sub TT. The pearl adds an extra little bling to it and the more black color on the bezel helps to better anchor the steel and gold tones. In all gold or steel, I'd have voted GMT.
|
29 January 2013, 01:10 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Wayne
Location: GA U.S.
Watch: tt gmt c
Posts: 113
|
I owned a black tt subc and traded it for the tt gmtc. Before the ceramic models came out the sub would have won. But the gmtc wins hands down for ne. Awesome looking watch!!!
|
29 January 2013, 01:26 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
quite similar, but I'm a sub guy. Naturally I voted for the sub
__________________
|
29 January 2013, 01:35 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
|
The GMTIIC does lend itself better to two tone. That said, the green hand and writing seem to get lost and the overall look of the watch is confused for me. I prefer the GMTIIC in SS or pure 18K.
My father owns the black dial Submariner in two tone and it looks really sharp in person. It gets my vote by a narrow margin. |
29 January 2013, 01:41 AM | #6 | ||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Quote:
Quote:
Im a sub guy too which is why altho the GMTC might make more sense in TT, Im still really drawn to the Subc TT. |
||
29 January 2013, 01:48 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
|
No wrong answer as said, but in TT SubC i would prefer the Blue,in black i would pick the GMTc.
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
29 January 2013, 01:59 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
GMT-IIc between those two.
Now, if the TT sub had the blue dial, I would have picked it. |
29 January 2013, 02:13 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Cheers guys, and I do like the Bluesy TT more than the old black TT but for the ceramics the flat blue dial is not so appealing to me so has to be black for me.
|
29 January 2013, 02:17 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 617
|
I would go for the Sub C TT, I think it has a cleaner / simple look and you mentioned you wouldn't really be using the GMT function... Plus with the Sub you get the guidelock clasp for easy size adjustments.
|
29 January 2013, 02:17 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
GMT IIC looks better than the Sub in TT.
__________________
|
29 January 2013, 02:24 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: James
Location: Michigan
Watch: 116613LB
Posts: 861
|
I like the sub
|
29 January 2013, 02:39 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: johannesburg
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 4,407
|
between those 2 the SUB
|
29 January 2013, 02:44 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Wayne
Location: GA U.S.
Watch: tt gmt c
Posts: 113
|
Not sure i can put my finger on it. I definitely think the green hand makes it pop! Also the large numbers. Now in the ss watch im sub all the way!!
|
29 January 2013, 02:57 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sala hu din
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,782
|
Black and ceramic + tt = GMT
|
29 January 2013, 02:58 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Sub, for me
|
29 January 2013, 04:09 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: NJ
Watch: Rolex 16610
Posts: 2,160
|
GMTIIC when comparing the two pictures.
|
29 January 2013, 04:18 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Leo
Location: Midwest
Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI
Posts: 21,461
|
I prefer the GMT over the Sub...so it received my vote. Maybe you should/could flip a coin and who ever wins 2 out of 3...is the one to go with!!!
Take it easy.....Leo
__________________
SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!! |
29 January 2013, 04:33 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Watch: SubC
Posts: 1,014
|
I actually asked the same question last spring:
http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=229085 I ended up going against the poll results and chose the TT SubC. I don't regret the decision at all. (1) The SubC's glidelock clasp is fantastic. My watch always fits perfectly despite temperature changes, with but a quick adjustment. (2) I prefer a toned-down SS watch for my travels, rather than a TT. I have a SS JLC GMT for that purpose. (3) IMO, the Sub just looks better. It is an icon for a reason, right? But really, both are great and you can't go wrong with either. |
29 January 2013, 05:12 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Thanks McLovin for the link and kudos to you for going against the poll! Looks alot closer this time round so far...
|
29 January 2013, 05:14 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Mate if I didnt have this forum to bounce ideas off you know this is what Id probably do... and knowing me right in front of the AD, proper Gangsta style!
|
29 January 2013, 05:58 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 14060M Submariner
Posts: 104
|
GMT's bezel is too busy. Sub pops more.
|
29 January 2013, 06:25 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
GMT 2 TT
|
29 January 2013, 06:27 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Connor
Location: USA
Watch: 214270
Posts: 132
|
this is an excellent question and really tough choice
something I have been struggling with recently as well but im leaning GMT --the dual time function is the deciding factor |
29 January 2013, 06:31 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Point Blank, TX
Posts: 2,894
|
The extra time zone seems like a hassle unless you travel. Also the triple lock crown seems like a better design too. I vote sub.
__________________
I once dated a girl in high school and her dad told me I would never amount to anything. He was right |
29 January 2013, 07:02 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Matt
Location: Berlin, Germany
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 294
|
The gold colour of the numbers on the GMT bezel looks a little flat compared to the Sub... Might be the GMT is a real life shot & Sub is a computer graphic image???
|
29 January 2013, 07:17 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,848
|
It's a tough choice, and I don't think you can go wrong with either. However, I'd pick the Sub. I think the design is slightly more classic and simple (in a good way) and if you are not going to use the GMT function I don't think it's worth having the extra hand. If you don't wear it every day and don't keep it on a winder, I find Rolex watches with the GMT hand to be slightly annoying to set. Not a big deal at all, but worth mentioning.
__________________
afc1 Watch Collection: Rolex and AP |
29 January 2013, 07:18 AM | #28 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
There is no wrong answer, so, I make it easy on myself: SS or WG? Sub. TT or full YG? GMTII.
|
29 January 2013, 07:20 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Ron
Location: Laguna Niguel, Ca
Watch: Rolex 116613LN
Posts: 1,724
|
SubC TT
|
29 January 2013, 08:58 AM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Almost a dead heat so far, surprised its not like the 2 to 1 of the previous poll.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.