ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

00pumpkin · 25 March 2013, 11:44 PM

Finally tried the Sky-Dweller on in person and I was correct in my assumption that I wouldn’t like this watch. The symmetrics are off and I think its way overpriced for that kind of complication. I think a true annual calendar from Rolex can command that sort of price but not this watch. It’s about $15k overpriced. I would take a DDII any day over this watch.

That being said, I’m glad Rolex is trying new things and stepping out of their comfort zone. I only hope that this watch will be a gateway to more complications.

roora85 · 26 March 2013, 12:04 AM

I think its a beautiful watch. Probably because its still really new that people dont like it. Once it matures I think it would be a great watch to have. Especially the rose gold one with the leather strap.

Lumberjact · 26 March 2013, 12:08 AM

Such a pity they didn't include the Day in this also. I would say the Day is a much more useful piece of information for most people than the Month, (notwithstanding the horology of the complication).

mjclark32 · 26 March 2013, 12:09 AM

I really like it, hope to see one in person soon.

TonyD · 26 March 2013, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lumberjact

Such a pity they didn't include the Day in this also. I would say the Day is a much more useful piece of information for most people than the Month, (notwithstanding the horology of the complication).

I concur. The second time zone is less useful here. It would have been nice to see a day wheel where the 2nd zone is shown. Strange to see a calendar that shows day and month, then for no reason a 2nd time zone.

Speed · 26 March 2013, 12:13 AM

Tried it on once. Did not dislike it as much in person...but it's a "Big un."

Proportions are a smidge out of whack.

kerytch · 26 March 2013, 12:23 AM

i think it's nice specially the RG model

00pumpkin · 26 March 2013, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lumberjact

Such a pity they didn't include the Day in this also. I would say the Day is a much more useful piece of information for most people than the Month, (notwithstanding the horology of the complication).

I agree. I think a day-date with a GMT function that was symmetrical would have been best!

Hound · 26 March 2013, 12:26 AM

I think the RG one is very classy. The others not so much.

Victory07 · 26 March 2013, 12:28 AM

What appears asymmetric to you? I'm a big fan of the RG model.

FremStar · 26 March 2013, 12:51 AM

Too bad you could not love it... I will say after months of ownership the Sky-Dweller by far is the best Rolex to own and enjoy by a long shot and this is coming from a chap who owns quite a few precision instruments across some of the major horology houses ;-)

69mach351 · 26 March 2013, 12:57 AM

Not my cup of tea either and it is a nice watch, there are others I would choose before it though.

00pumpkin · 26 March 2013, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victory07

What appears asymmetric to you? I'm a big fan of the RG model.

The RG on strap is the best looking Sky-Dweller out there for sure.

The GMT wheel is off center.

wantonebad · 26 March 2013, 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FremStar

Too bad you could not love it... I will say after months of ownership the Sky-Dweller by far is the best Rolex to own and enjoy by a long shot and this is coming from a chap who owns quite a few precision instruments across some of the major horology houses ;-)

As I have said before and will say again Sam, your combo of dial and RG is stunning!

Functionally its not a "wantonebad" watch, but I certainly can appreciate it's amalgamation of form and function, it really is a remarkable watch and as a fan of Rolex and watches in general it's a feather in their cap for sure!

FremStar · 26 March 2013, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wantonebad

As I have said before and will say again Sam, your combo of dial and RG is stunning!

Functionally its not a "wantonebad" watch, but I certainly can appreciate it's amalgamation of form and function, it really is a remarkable watch and as a fan of Rolex and watches in general it's a feather in their cap for sure!

;-) Marc, as with all things new it surely takes time before folks warm up to something... I am hopeful that in about 15-20 years folks and collectors alike will say I get the picture now

bonbonson · 26 March 2013, 01:57 AM

I must say I never was a huge fan of the Skydweller until yesterday when i tried it on just for the sake of it. A RG sky dweller on a leather strap it was a BEAUT if the price was a bit more achievable i would have pulled the trigger. The RG skydweller is the best looking sky dweller compared to the other skydweller with YG and WG. The RG contrast very well with the strap looks very well

Miguel Alvarez · 26 March 2013, 02:22 AM

I tried on a YG version a few months ago and it looks nicer than the pictures give it credit IMHO. It's still some way down the want's list but it's not a complete no no of a watch.

Kevin.S · 26 March 2013, 02:29 AM

D/D for me :)

Cru Jones · 26 March 2013, 02:39 AM

my favorite part of the SkyD threads that pop up from time to time is sam jumping in with his gorgeous piece. love it!

Rocco22 · 26 March 2013, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FremStar

Too bad you could not love it... I will say after months of ownership the Sky-Dweller by far is the best Rolex to own and enjoy by a long shot and this is coming from a chap who owns quite a few precision instruments across some of the major horology houses ;-)

that is a beautiful watch, my dream watch.

SWISSAHOLICS · 26 March 2013, 04:42 AM

I would pick a DDII over SKD

withthesword · 26 March 2013, 04:44 AM

i tried on the full YG version in paris.

i seriously considered running away with it. waaaay too beautiful than should be realistically allowed.

JerimiahLee · 26 March 2013, 04:47 AM

I need to try one of these on.

aw9nineteen · 26 March 2013, 05:09 AM

I've tried on all 3, and make no mistake, the pictures don't to them justice IMO. They are beautiful pieces. I was very close to purchasing a YG SkD but the price wasn't flexible just yet so I decided on a YG DD and will hopefully next year purchase a SkD. With a flexible price on the DD, it ended up being close to 20k difference. I figured i could get that and a Steel AP and still be under the 46k+ price.

Also, like its been said, I REALLY would have liked to see the day ... No one should ever forget the month lol (the mechanics are nice though).

watchwatcher · 26 March 2013, 06:32 AM

Hmm...interesting. By symmetrics being off, do you mean the overall piece, or the dial? I haven't seen one yet in person, but one observation about the second time zone wheel: I'm not sure I like how it "cuts off" the bottom numerals...I would have to see it on person to make a judgement.

montpyt · 26 March 2013, 07:24 AM

That is one big watch!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

Rags · 26 March 2013, 09:25 AM

I'd pick a DD over the SD too.

WhatTheDeuce · 26 March 2013, 10:20 AM

I hear many say that it's not worth it for an annual calendar, but what I think some fail to see is the impressive way Rolex implemented the controls for the annual calendar. It is simply genius, IMO. For that reason alone, I think it demands the price they are asking. Again, just my opinion.

Hairdude1 · 26 March 2013, 10:26 AM

The Sky Dweller has been growing on me. I would still get a DD in YG or platinum before I would pick up a sky dweller

analog · 26 March 2013, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchwatcher

I'm not sure I like how it "cuts off" the bottom numerals...I would have to see it on person to make a judgement.

That's what I don't like about it. That kills it for me.

25 March 2013, 11:44 PM	#1
00pumpkin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Dustin Location: USA Posts: 1,980	Tried on the Sky-Dweller... Finally tried the Sky-Dweller on in person and I was correct in my assumption that I wouldn’t like this watch. The symmetrics are off and I think its way overpriced for that kind of complication. I think a true annual calendar from Rolex can command that sort of price but not this watch. It’s about $15k overpriced. I would take a DDII any day over this watch. That being said, I’m glad Rolex is trying new things and stepping out of their comfort zone. I only hope that this watch will be a gateway to more complications. Attached Images

26 March 2013, 12:08 AM	#3
Lumberjact "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Paris Watch: Explorer Posts: 446	Such a pity they didn't include the Day in this also. I would say the Day is a much more useful piece of information for most people than the Month, (notwithstanding the horology of the complication). __________________ "Onto his wrist he slipped his steel Rolex Oyster Perpetual, the 34mm model, the date window its only complication; Bond did not need to know the phases of the moon or the exact moment of high tide at Southampton. And he suspected very few people did."

26 March 2013, 12:09 AM	#4
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	I really like it, hope to see one in person soon. __________________

26 March 2013, 12:51 AM	#11
FremStar "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Sam Location: Gotham City Watch: Wall Street Posts: 9,954	Too bad you could not love it... I will say after months of ownership the Sky-Dweller by far is the best Rolex to own and enjoy by a long shot and this is coming from a chap who owns quite a few precision instruments across some of the major horology houses ;-) __________________ "Wealth is of the heart and mind, not of the pocket!" "A Watch Is An Emotional Object, And So, It Is The Responsibility Of The Brand To Create Emotion Through It's Products" - Georges Kern "In the 1950s and 60s, they made the Ref 8171, which is a cult collectible—now that’s the ultimate Rolex you could own with a calendar and a moon phase.” - John Reardon "Heh, heh, heh..." - Michael Kilyung

26 March 2013, 04:42 AM	#21
SWISSAHOLICS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Here! Watch: Rolex Posts: 4,366	I would pick a DDII over SKD __________________ 16610LN \| 16613LB \| 16710 Pepsi \| 118238 \| 116500 (White) \| 116500 (Black) \| 116710BLNR \| 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."

26 March 2013, 12:04 AM	#2
roora85 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: NJ Watch: Day Date 2 Posts: 81	I think its a beautiful watch. Probably because its still really new that people dont like it. Once it matures I think it would be a great watch to have. Especially the rose gold one with the leather strap.

26 March 2013, 12:13 AM	#6
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	Tried it on once. Did not dislike it as much in person...but it's a "Big un." Proportions are a smidge out of whack.

26 March 2013, 12:23 AM	#7
kerytch "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Ph Posts: 323	i think it's nice specially the RG model

26 March 2013, 12:26 AM	#9
Hound "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Michael Location: Melbourne Posts: 222	I think the RG one is very classy. The others not so much.

26 March 2013, 12:28 AM	#10
Victory07 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: U.S. Posts: 118	What appears asymmetric to you? I'm a big fan of the RG model.

26 March 2013, 12:57 AM	#12
69mach351 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Midwest Watch: 116900 Posts: 1,066	Not my cup of tea either and it is a nice watch, there are others I would choose before it though.

26 March 2013, 01:57 AM	#16
bonbonson "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: philippines Posts: 387	I must say I never was a huge fan of the Skydweller until yesterday when i tried it on just for the sake of it. A RG sky dweller on a leather strap it was a BEAUT if the price was a bit more achievable i would have pulled the trigger. The RG skydweller is the best looking sky dweller compared to the other skydweller with YG and WG. The RG contrast very well with the strap looks very well

26 March 2013, 02:22 AM	#17
Miguel Alvarez "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: England Watch: Exp2/Sub/DJ Posts: 343	I tried on a YG version a few months ago and it looks nicer than the pictures give it credit IMHO. It's still some way down the want's list but it's not a complete no no of a watch.

26 March 2013, 02:29 AM	#18
Kevin.S 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Kevin Location: Maine Watch: All of them Posts: 1,376	D/D for me :)

26 March 2013, 02:39 AM	#19
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,303	my favorite part of the SkyD threads that pop up from time to time is sam jumping in with his gorgeous piece. love it!

26 March 2013, 04:44 AM	#22
withthesword "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Matte Location: Toronto Watch: 16570 Posts: 1,006	i tried on the full YG version in paris. i seriously considered running away with it. waaaay too beautiful than should be realistically allowed. __________________ Ready. Ready. Hack. My Flickr Photostream Wishlist: 1984 gmt

26 March 2013, 04:47 AM	#23
JerimiahLee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Jerimiah Location: NYC Watch: 5513 Meters 1st Posts: 669	I need to try one of these on.

26 March 2013, 05:09 AM	#24
aw9nineteen "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Illinois Posts: 226	I've tried on all 3, and make no mistake, the pictures don't to them justice IMO. They are beautiful pieces. I was very close to purchasing a YG SkD but the price wasn't flexible just yet so I decided on a YG DD and will hopefully next year purchase a SkD. With a flexible price on the DD, it ended up being close to 20k difference. I figured i could get that and a Steel AP and still be under the 46k+ price. Also, like its been said, I REALLY would have liked to see the day ... No one should ever forget the month lol (the mechanics are nice though).

26 March 2013, 06:32 AM	#25
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,047	Hmm...interesting. By symmetrics being off, do you mean the overall piece, or the dial? I haven't seen one yet in person, but one observation about the second time zone wheel: I'm not sure I like how it "cuts off" the bottom numerals...I would have to see it on person to make a judgement.

26 March 2013, 07:24 AM	#26
montpyt "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Shawn Location: WPB, FL Watch: 116610LV "HULK" Posts: 1,095	Tried on the Sky-Dweller... That is one big watch! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 __________________ ACTIVE MEMBER OF RED SOX NATION

26 March 2013, 09:25 AM	#27
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	I'd pick a DD over the SD too. __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

26 March 2013, 10:20 AM	#28
WhatTheDeuce "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Kyung Location: Anywhere? Watch: cha want... Posts: 4,488	I hear many say that it's not worth it for an annual calendar, but what I think some fail to see is the impressive way Rolex implemented the controls for the annual calendar. It is simply genius, IMO. For that reason alone, I think it demands the price they are asking. Again, just my opinion. __________________ Instagram: @whatthedeuce_

26 March 2013, 10:26 AM	#29
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	The Sky Dweller has been growing on me. I would still get a DD in YG or platinum before I would pick up a sky dweller

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)