|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 March 2013, 04:57 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Pieterjan
Location: Belgium
Posts: 193
|
Red sub or 5512?
What would you guys pick? A vintage red sub or a 5512? i can't decide... :(
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 04:58 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
Lets see some pics...then i'll tell you what I would get
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 05:20 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
|
I just went through a similar evaluation - 5513 or 1680 and ended up taking the best example of what I could find. I am so glad I did. In my case, It is WAY better having a pristine example of a 1680 vs a routine example of the 5513.
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 05:33 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
With condition being equal, I would absolutely get the Red sub.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason  Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches  PLEXI IS SEXY |
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 06:16 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Paul
Location: UK, Dorset
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,636
|
I went for a Red Sub
__________________
 Rolex Sub 1680, Rolex GMT 116710LN, Rolex Datejust 16220 Salmon Dial (the Mrs), Tudor BB58, Tudor Pelagos Blue and Several Seiko's ************************************************** ***************** "last one in the chopper is a rotten egg" Jonathan Quayle Higgins III |
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 06:19 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: michael
Location: Florida
Watch: explorer II cream
Posts: 1,664
|
If the 5512 is a great example of a gilt dial
then I would go for the 5512 :-) that said find the best example of whatever you would love to wear and go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 06:19 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
as much as i love the Red Sub...If the condition were equal, as stated above, I would personally go with the 5512. Get what YOU like...period.
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 06:28 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: España
Posts: 58
|
Red sub
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 06:46 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
I went red - there was no question for me...
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 06:47 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
|
...the one that speaks to your soul
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones. DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series |
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 07:25 AM
|
#11 |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
That all depends...There are 5512's and then there are 5512's! If you are talking about a 63' Swiss only Underline 4 line gilt vs. a Red Sub then of course no question...5512! If you are talking about a late 5512 matte dial vs. an Mk1 Red Sub well then of course Red Sub.
For me it would be quite hard to beat an early PCG Gilt 4 line 5512 in pristine condition. Happy hunting and remember there are many variances in vintage Rolex and wide gaps between certain references which create major price differences. Also finding superlative early 5512's close to impossible vs. finding later series Red Subs. Regardless of what one does buying from a reputable person and best overall example is paramount to decision. As stated above also--get the one that speaks to you most.
__________________
 SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 07:32 AM
|
#12 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
 However, if it wasn't a rare 5512 and condition being equal, then the red. Pete |
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 07:49 AM
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: Milsub 5513/5517
Posts: 143
|
I love red Sub but, I'll go with a 5512 with Gilt dial for sure!
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 07:59 AM
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: Milsub 5513/5517
Posts: 143
|
With all respect to the Red SUB, a 5512 or 5513 watch like the one in the picture below is more beautiful than a Red Sub (PS- Those watches are not mine but I am looking for more or less a similar one)
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 08:21 AM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 152
|
^^^^^This.
That first pic is absolutely gorgeous. I am partial to gilt dials, so I agree with simplerolex. |
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 08:48 AM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
Great pics,
 I humbly submit my Red as an aid to consideration 
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 09:02 AM
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 461
|
Over time, you will own both
Quote:
Sir, you have contracted an incurable disease and sad to say, sorry there is no cure. |
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 09:17 AM
|
#18 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
|
Quote:
 
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones. DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series |
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 09:28 AM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Blue 76100
Posts: 85
|
There are a lot of subs with date that I would like to own (I have 3 currently) but when I get around to getting a no date, 5512 is the only one I lust after.
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 11:10 AM
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 461
|
I like your MB!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 11:22 AM
|
#21 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Grant
Location: NZ
Watch: Moon
Posts: 1,719
|
Tough call.
And in the end, you either have to go with your gut, or resign yourself to the fact that you'll eventually wind up buying both. For what it's worth: As much as I love my 1680, which is a lot, the simplicity of the no-date Subs (new and old) is just unbeatable. To me, it's the purest expression of the sport Rolex. Good luck and keep us posted. -GW |
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 11:25 AM
|
#22 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Rich
Location: NC
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 2,359
|
Tough call. I really love my 5512
Here is my fathers red Tough call. Send some pics our way. Rich
__________________
Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97 |
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 11:49 AM
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Hank
Location: Wachula
Watch: Had many love all
Posts: 476
|
I think you should go with the 1665. I prefer the rail dial, but anyone of the vintage ones is fine. Double red is awesome too.
Last edited by Rolexis; 30 March 2013 at 12:03 PM.. Reason: Picture |
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 12:06 PM
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Hank
Location: Wachula
Watch: Had many love all
Posts: 476
|
You will never regret owning a vintage 1665.
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 05:18 PM
|
#25 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Both are really nice watches . . . though decision . .
Happy Easter
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 05:46 PM
|
#26 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: Milsub 5513/5517
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2013, 11:25 PM
|
#27 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Pieterjan
Location: Belgium
Posts: 193
|
Guys, thanks for the great advice and pictures. After seeing the picture below I made up my mind: a 5512 it is! I still the think a red Sub is really nice, but you must all know that I own a Sub C. I think a 5512 is more different from a Sub C than a red Sub... Don't you guys agree?
What a beauty!! What can you guys tell me about the model above? And what are the things that are importent when buying a 5512 in terms of value? School me! Thanks guys |
|
|
|
|
31 March 2013, 07:47 AM
|
#28 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: Milsub 5513/5517
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
I think a 5512 or 5513 are true vintage subs with lot of character and real diving instruments... Red sub is also vintage but it is more a day to day functional watch with date function All the above have plexi glass; while SubC with is a modern watch with sapphire crystal and the comparison to the above is apple to orange As far as 5512 features, most important thing is the watch originality (not only 100% genuine parts but all parts or at a minimum key parts to be original to the watch like dial and case) Gilt dial with a nice patina matching gilt hand and patina Unpolished case with pointy crown guard Twinlock crown And of course a serviced movement in good condition You can also get a 5513 with gilt dial it might run you cheaper than 5512 (it is going to be a good value watch and very similar to 5512 especially if you are on a budget) I hope this helps and best of luck! |
|
|
|
|
|
31 March 2013, 03:47 PM
|
#29 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 593
|
Red Sub!
|
|
|
|
|
31 March 2013, 05:27 PM
|
#30 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
It would have to be an amazing 5512 to convince me to turn in my MKI Red...
 
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
