ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

frostie · 31 December 2007, 05:21 PM

http://cgi.ebay.com/rolex-daytona-st...QQcmdZViewItem

SPACE-DWELLER · 31 December 2007, 05:29 PM

Several things don't add up with this one:

1) Seller states he bought it for US 10 K one year ago. That price could only refer to an SS Daytona, since the WG one would be much more expensive.

2) The diamond dial is not availible for the SS Daytona.

3) The Rolex coronet on the caseside at 9??

4) Silver colour of the register rims too shiny, and they don't seemed to have been moved up by 7 % as the registers on the real Daytonas are.

5) Thin hands?? Nothing wrong with that, but it makes the watch older than suggested.

boa2 · 31 December 2007, 05:30 PM

Awful.

jac67 · 31 December 2007, 10:52 PM

Man, this is New Years Eve NOT April Fools right?

Run away from this QUICK.....................

John.

Alcan · 31 December 2007, 11:17 PM

Ya gotta love the current high bidder's feedback, minus 2! Shill Bidders R' Us!!

arttay10 · 1 January 2008, 02:58 AM

It had been removed before I had time to have a laugh at it

frostie · 1 January 2008, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arttay10

It had been removed before I had time to have a laugh at it

31 December 2007, 05:21 PM	#1
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	Take a look at this http://cgi.ebay.com/rolex-daytona-st...QQcmdZViewItem

31 December 2007, 05:29 PM	#2
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	Several things don't add up with this one: 1) Seller states he bought it for US 10 K one year ago. That price could only refer to an SS Daytona, since the WG one would be much more expensive. 2) The diamond dial is not availible for the SS Daytona. 3) The Rolex coronet on the caseside at 9?? 4) Silver colour of the register rims too shiny, and they don't seemed to have been moved up by 7 % as the registers on the real Daytonas are. 5) Thin hands?? Nothing wrong with that, but it makes the watch older than suggested. __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

31 December 2007, 11:17 PM	#5
Alcan 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Al Location: Way Up North Watch: your P's & Q's Posts: 10,473	Ya gotta love the current high bidder's feedback, minus 2! Shill Bidders R' Us!! __________________ Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!

31 December 2007, 05:30 PM	#3
boa2 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Howard Location: Utah Watch: Lover Posts: 3,940	Awful.

31 December 2007, 10:52 PM	#4
jac67 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: John Location: Australia Watch: Me Posts: 1,950	Man, this is New Years Eve NOT April Fools right? Run away from this QUICK..................... John.

1 January 2008, 02:58 AM	#6
arttay10 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Lancashire, UK Watch: ???????? Posts: 2,187	It had been removed before I had time to have a laugh at it

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)