ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JohnFM · 19 April 2013, 05:46 AM

If any of you own, or have owned, an Explorer I (36 or 39mm), 14060M, or 114060M, I'd be interested in knowing how you'd compare them in terms of comfort on the wrist, especially over the course of a long day.

I realize that none of them is huge and all will work well on my 6.75" wrist, but I've found that some watches wear more comfortably than others ... and it's pretty difficult to tell when only trying them on for a few minutes.

Thanks.
John

Genevapics · 19 April 2013, 05:58 AM

I love my 14060M and wear it 24/7. No problems with wrist fatigue at all. So comfortable, that sometimes I forget it is on. Wonderful watch.

afc1 · 19 April 2013, 06:00 AM

Can't comment on the other two but the 14060M is very comfortable. I probably wear it 60% of the time out of my three watches.

100thmonkey · 19 April 2013, 06:02 AM

114060m, most comfortable and proportioned piece I have ever owned

do or die · 19 April 2013, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 100thmonkey

114060m, most comfortable and proportioned piece i have ever owned

x2

jay_kay · 19 April 2013, 06:10 AM

I've owned the 14060 and the 214270, I find the slimmer profile of the Explorer more comfortable and the bracelet feels much more substantial. The 114060 seem a bit bulky but I've only tried it on for a matter of minutes. Looks much chunkier though.

sea-dweller · 19 April 2013, 06:29 AM

I have an Explorer 1 and a 14060, for me, the Explorer I is the most comfortable. I do have small wrists.

kxux · 19 April 2013, 06:39 AM

Explorer I is the most comfortable Rolex I ever owned. But all of your choices are great and comfy watches.

111forza · 19 April 2013, 07:22 AM

36mm Explorer so comfortable

Lew Archer · 19 April 2013, 07:27 AM

Comfort of the 14060M and the Explorer 1 39mm is comparable. They have a slightly different feel, and the bracelet of the Exp is slightly heavier, but both are very comfortable to wear all day every day.

Zman15 · 19 April 2013, 07:39 AM

I owned the 14060m and 36 Explorer. I would have to say the Explorer by a slight edge.

Jannal · 19 April 2013, 08:13 AM

The Explorer I 114270 is a little bit small for me.
The Sub ND 14060M is the most comfortable compared to the 114060.
However, the most comfortable Rolex that I've ever worn is the Explorer II 16570.

joe100 · 19 April 2013, 09:54 AM

Explorer 1, no contest

Dr. Robert · 19 April 2013, 10:24 AM

36mm explorer, 36mm datejust, 36mm oyster perp..........the most comfy watches for me as an all day watch.

gregmoeck · 19 April 2013, 11:08 AM

I have owned all three, get the 39mm for comfort, get subc no date, not the 14060, the bracelets on the new models and the color of the steel, plus the improved movement is worth the extra.

nick c · 19 April 2013, 11:31 AM

gmtm2 · 19 April 2013, 05:05 PM

I believe that all the watches you mention are very comfortable...i own a gmt ii c, its 143 gr allows me to go running with it on the wrist.

Cru Jones · 19 April 2013, 05:53 PM

i've tried on the 39mm explorer and found it to be VERY comfortable.

cop414 · 19 April 2013, 09:16 PM

I can't comment on the other two but my 14060M wears very well on my 7 inch wrist, it sits close and low for me.

GradyPhilpott · 20 April 2013, 12:09 AM

I have a 114270 and a 14060m and while they are both comfortable, the 114270 is the more comfortable than the 14060M.

I put on my Explorer yesterday after wearing the Sub for about 2-3 weeks and it is a nice change of pace besides being of such a simple, gracile, yet robust design.

beshannon · 20 April 2013, 12:25 AM

My 14060M is very comfortable, I just dislike the rattling bracelet and the cheap clasp

stockae92 · 20 April 2013, 05:58 AM

I don't have an Explorer, but I have an Explorer II (old style) and its more comfortable than the my 14060M (which is the most comfortable Sub for me)

patek.wis · 20 April 2013, 06:19 AM

The old bracelets are dead to me
They have that one extra link non removable on the six side. Kills balance

My exp39mm is perfect

gregmoeck · 20 April 2013, 06:49 AM

The 39mm explorer or milgauss is the most comfortable, I've yet to try a dj2. I find the new sub bracelets are more comfortable than the old

JohnFM · 20 April 2013, 06:55 AM

Great answers all -- thanks very much!

Sounds like the Explorers, both 36 and 39mm, are very comfortable, with the 14060M a close second.

Now if Rolex decides to lengthen the hands of the 39mm Explorer, will it then be too heavy? ;-)

John

watchmaniac · 20 April 2013, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jannal

The Explorer I 114270 is a little bit small for me.
The Sub ND 14060M is the most comfortable compared to the 114060.
However, the most comfortable Rolex that I've ever worn is the Explorer II 16570.

+1 on the 16570 Explorer II. Most comfortable watch I've ever owned.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

kryten2001 · 20 April 2013, 01:13 PM

14060m in either NATO or a leather strap is outrageously comfortable.

I also have a Daytona and it feels like wearing irons in comparison.

jshepard · 20 April 2013, 02:19 PM

I've got an explorer I 39mm and its very comfortable, the easy link extension is amazing for when it gets warm. The head is fairly thin and sleek. And the bracelet is pretty substantial but not too heavy however the clasp itself seems a bit bulky and square in comparison to the sleekness of the rest of the watch but at least it feels heavy duty. I've only tried the 14060 and the 114060 on for a few minutes and I feel the older 14060 was more comfortable. The ceramic model felt a bit bulky and square. Although the 14060's bracelet kind of feels cheap but it's very light so that's a plus. For ultimate comfort, nothing beats a padded leather strap!

G.J · 20 April 2013, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe100

Explorer 1, no contest

dvdwyn · 20 April 2013, 11:13 PM

i vote for 39mm explorer 1, so comfortable...

19 April 2013, 05:46 AM	#1
JohnFM "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: northern CA USA Watch: 114270 Explorer Posts: 479	Comfort only -- Explorer I, 14060M, 114060M? If any of you own, or have owned, an Explorer I (36 or 39mm), 14060M, or 114060M, I'd be interested in knowing how you'd compare them in terms of comfort on the wrist, especially over the course of a long day. I realize that none of them is huge and all will work well on my 6.75" wrist, but I've found that some watches wear more comfortably than others ... and it's pretty difficult to tell when only trying them on for a few minutes. Thanks. John

19 April 2013, 05:58 AM	#2
Genevapics "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Andre Location: Delaware Watch: Submariner Posts: 296	I love my 14060M and wear it 24/7. No problems with wrist fatigue at all. So comfortable, that sometimes I forget it is on. Wonderful watch. __________________ *–Andre´*

19 April 2013, 06:00 AM	#3
afc1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Boston Posts: 1,848	Can't comment on the other two but the 14060M is very comfortable. I probably wear it 60% of the time out of my three watches. __________________ afc1 Watch Collection: Rolex and AP

19 April 2013, 06:10 AM	#6
jay_kay "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Barrowford Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54 Posts: 1,699	I've owned the 14060 and the 214270, I find the slimmer profile of the Explorer more comfortable and the bracelet feels much more substantial. The 114060 seem a bit bulky but I've only tried it on for a matter of minutes. Looks much chunkier though. __________________ Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1

19 April 2013, 07:22 AM	#9
111forza "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: uk Posts: 2,668	36mm Explorer so comfortable Attached Images

19 April 2013, 06:02 AM	#4
100thmonkey "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: The Major Location: Surrey, UK Watch: All Are Beautiful Posts: 356	114060m, most comfortable and proportioned piece I have ever owned

19 April 2013, 06:29 AM	#7
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I have an Explorer 1 and a 14060, for me, the Explorer I is the most comfortable. I do have small wrists.

19 April 2013, 06:39 AM	#8
kxux 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Jan Location: PA Watch: GMT II Posts: 1,110	Explorer I is the most comfortable Rolex I ever owned. But all of your choices are great and comfy watches.

19 April 2013, 07:27 AM	#10
Lew Archer "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: L.A., Calif. Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 2,220	Comfort of the 14060M and the Explorer 1 39mm is comparable. They have a slightly different feel, and the bracelet of the Exp is slightly heavier, but both are very comfortable to wear all day every day.

19 April 2013, 07:39 AM	#11
Zman15 Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: US Posts: 294	I owned the 14060m and 36 Explorer. I would have to say the Explorer by a slight edge.

19 April 2013, 08:13 AM	#12
Jannal "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 685	The Explorer I 114270 is a little bit small for me. The Sub ND 14060M is the most comfortable compared to the 114060. However, the most comfortable Rolex that I've ever worn is the Explorer II 16570. __________________ Bell & Ross: BRS-98S Casio: G-Shock GW-5000U / GW-5000-1JF / DW-5035D 35th / DW-5030C 30th / DW-5000SP 20th / DW-5600C-9CV / Marlin W-450 Panerai: Luminor 000i Seiko: SBGX117 / SBGX335

19 April 2013, 09:54 AM	#13
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,840	Explorer 1, no contest __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

19 April 2013, 10:24 AM	#14
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,277	36mm explorer, 36mm datejust, 36mm oyster perp..........the most comfy watches for me as an all day watch. __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

19 April 2013, 11:08 AM	#15
gregmoeck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Maui Watch: Patek Posts: 2,032	I have owned all three, get the 39mm for comfort, get subc no date, not the 14060, the bracelets on the new models and the color of the steel, plus the improved movement is worth the extra.

19 April 2013, 11:31 AM	#16
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	Attached Images

19 April 2013, 05:05 PM	#17
gmtm2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Italy Posts: 1,419	I believe that all the watches you mention are very comfortable...i own a gmt ii c, its 143 gr allows me to go running with it on the wrist. __________________ forever rolex

19 April 2013, 05:53 PM	#18
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,300	i've tried on the 39mm explorer and found it to be VERY comfortable.

19 April 2013, 09:16 PM	#19
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 72,244	I can't comment on the other two but my 14060M wears very well on my 7 inch wrist, it sits close and low for me. Attached Images __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

20 April 2013, 12:09 AM	#20
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK047 Posts: 34,460	I have a 114270 and a 14060m and while they are both comfortable, the 114270 is the more comfortable than the 14060M. I put on my Explorer yesterday after wearing the Sub for about 2-3 weeks and it is a nice change of pace besides being of such a simple, gracile, yet robust design. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

20 April 2013, 12:25 AM	#21
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	My 14060M is very comfortable, I just dislike the rattling bracelet and the cheap clasp __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

20 April 2013, 05:58 AM	#22
stockae92 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Socal Posts: 4,964	I don't have an Explorer, but I have an Explorer II (old style) and its more comfortable than the my 14060M (which is the most comfortable Sub for me) __________________ 135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R

20 April 2013, 06:19 AM	#23
patek.wis "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Will Location: Canada Watch: The Sky Posts: 1,824	The old bracelets are dead to me They have that one extra link non removable on the six side. Kills balance My exp39mm is perfect

20 April 2013, 06:49 AM	#24
gregmoeck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Maui Watch: Patek Posts: 2,032	The 39mm explorer or milgauss is the most comfortable, I've yet to try a dj2. I find the new sub bracelets are more comfortable than the old

20 April 2013, 06:55 AM	#25
JohnFM "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: northern CA USA Watch: 114270 Explorer Posts: 479	Great answers all -- thanks very much! Sounds like the Explorers, both 36 and 39mm, are very comfortable, with the 14060M a close second. Now if Rolex decides to lengthen the hands of the 39mm Explorer, will it then be too heavy? ;-) John

20 April 2013, 01:13 PM	#27
kryten2001 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Australia Posts: 283	14060m in either NATO or a leather strap is outrageously comfortable. I also have a Daytona and it feels like wearing irons in comparison.

20 April 2013, 02:19 PM	#28
jshepard "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: USA Watch: GMTII Posts: 1,180	I've got an explorer I 39mm and its very comfortable, the easy link extension is amazing for when it gets warm. The head is fairly thin and sleek. And the bracelet is pretty substantial but not too heavy however the clasp itself seems a bit bulky and square in comparison to the sleekness of the rest of the watch but at least it feels heavy duty. I've only tried the 14060 and the 114060 on for a few minutes and I feel the older 14060 was more comfortable. The ceramic model felt a bit bulky and square. Although the 14060's bracelet kind of feels cheap but it's very light so that's a plus. For ultimate comfort, nothing beats a padded leather strap!

20 April 2013, 11:13 PM	#30
dvdwyn "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Earth Posts: 182	i vote for 39mm explorer 1, so comfortable... __________________ 87-88 – R / 89-90 – L / 90 – E / 91 – E / 91 – X / 91 – N / 92 – C / 93 / 94 – S / 95 / 96 – W / 96 / 97 – T / 97 / 98 – U / 98 / 99 – A / 00 Apr – P / 01 Aug – K / 02 Sep – Y / 04 Jan – F / 05 Jan to 06 Jul – D / 06 Jul to 07 Dec – Z / 08 Jan to 08 Nov – M /08 Dec to 10 – V / mid 10 to end 10 – G / 2011 to now – alphanumeric

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)