ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 June 2013, 04:47 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 135
|
Safe to swim wearing IWC Mark XVI?
Hello - is it safe to swim wearing an IWC Mark XVI. The watch is rated at 60m. Never quite sure how these ratings related to real life though. Seems to vary by manufacturer. The watch was a screw down crown and case back. In terms of swimming it would be in the pool and ocean. Would not go deeper the 10 or 15 feet underwater. Appreciate comments. Thanks.
|
20 June 2013, 04:53 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bob
Location: NJ
Watch: Less each year...
Posts: 464
|
Yes, it's safe to swim with that watch...
Quote:
|
|
20 June 2013, 05:25 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50
Posts: 1,966
|
You'll be fine. But remember, if you plan to swim regularly with the watch it's good to get it pressure tested once a year at your nearest watch maker. Any watch is only as good as its seals/gaskets.
There's so many debates on this it's hard to know what's factual. There's threads floating around on watch forums debating the dynamic pressures exerted on a watch as you swim -- some engineers have even chimed in with complex equations on the matter with most suggesting the force is very minimal. Then there's certain manuals (Grand Seiko for example) that clearly state dynamic pressure is a factor and to avoid high pressure running water and vigorous swimming activities with some WR. Although it's probably more a preventative measure on their part... I feel the debate is so convoluted without any real world experiments that I won't be satisfied until Stephen Hawking chimes in on the matter. |
20 June 2013, 05:29 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 135
|
That link was very helpful. Thank you.
|
20 June 2013, 05:56 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I miss my XVI.
|
20 June 2013, 06:37 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 135
|
Mike - I hear you. The XVI is a great watch. I also have a 14060m sub no date. I seem to switch back and forth but to be honest the XVI is way more comfortable and accurate. I would say they almost wear the same size as well despite the XVI being 1mm smaller.
|
20 June 2013, 07:09 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
The bracelet I had on my XVI made it very rugged.
|
20 June 2013, 11:51 PM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
|
|
20 June 2013, 11:52 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
My Mark XV (38mm) wears larger than my GMT2 (40mm) due to the dramatically larger dial. It's also a million times more comfortable.
|
21 June 2013, 12:31 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
|
The mark pilot is gorgeous. I judt got my mark 17 in bracelet and love it.
__________________
Watching date changes every midnight |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.