ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mike@ec · 20 June 2013, 11:34 PM

I was looking at an Overseas Chrono the other day, and I think it looks pretty decent,

but since I'm a fairly big guy, I was wondering is it just me that wishes they made this line a little bit bigger like a 46mm, the 42mm just looks kind of small on my wrist, when compared to my other watches in my collection.

ELITEVIDEOGAMES · 20 June 2013, 11:46 PM

I think 42 is perfect for this model IMO. Im sure it would look great on you, 46 would be overkill (you can always get a Panerai). I wish they would get rid of that 1 over-sized register to give it better symmetry.
I saw the special boutique only version with a blue face and it was gorgeous.

JP Chestnut · 21 June 2013, 02:35 AM

There are already too many 46mm watches. The world doesn't need another one.

c.rod · 21 June 2013, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP Chestnut

There are already too many 46mm watches. The world doesn't need another one.

yes we do!!!! keep your small wrists out of this... lmao

JP Chestnut · 21 June 2013, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c.rod

yes we do!!!! keep your small wrists out of this... lmao

Head on over to IWC. They'll set you up with a 46mm dress watch. Not really, I think it's a measly 44mm.

shnxx · 21 June 2013, 06:14 AM

Iwc and panerai are perfect brands for those with NBA player wrists.

capote · 21 June 2013, 07:13 PM

I think VC should release a thin caliber 2121 Overseas, like the sort of original model 222 at 37-40 mm. If you want big, try the AP ROO. I think there is at least one 48 mm model.

yitbos76 · 29 June 2013, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ELITEVIDEOGAMES

I think 42 is perfect for this model IMO. Im sure it would look great on you, 46 would be overkill (you can always get a Panerai). I wish they would get rid of that 1 over-sized register to give it better symmetry.
I saw the special boutique only version with a blue face and it was gorgeous.

fyi it is not botique only. I saw one at the wynn watch store in vegas

texex91 · 2 July 2013, 11:51 PM

I tried one on in Vegas a few months back. Looks WAY too small on the wrist for a 42mm. It wears like a 39mm.

JP Chestnut · 3 July 2013, 02:11 AM

^^ It could be your photo but IMO that's how a watch is supposed to look on a wrist. It doesn't look small in the least.

incontrol · 3 July 2013, 02:14 AM

In fact I think it looks really nice on your wrist!

Sent from Kevin's Tapatalk!

JorgeCCW · 3 July 2013, 09:10 PM

Here is mine
Name: image.jpg
Views: 116
Size: 86.0 KB

It wears a little bigger than you think, good luck

AK797 · 4 July 2013, 06:37 AM

Cant judge how it looks from close up pics due to the fisheye effect, need to have at least 12-15 inches gap from camera to arm to get a realistic view.

20 June 2013, 11:34 PM	#1
mike@ec "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Toronto Watch: Rolex Explorer II, Posts: 419	VC Overseas I was looking at an Overseas Chrono the other day, and I think it looks pretty decent, but since I'm a fairly big guy, I was wondering is it just me that wishes they made this line a little bit bigger like a 46mm, the 42mm just looks kind of small on my wrist, when compared to my other watches in my collection.

21 June 2013, 06:14 AM	#6
shnxx "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,120	Iwc and panerai are perfect brands for those with NBA player wrists. __________________ newb watch collector

3 July 2013, 02:14 AM	#11
incontrol "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Kevin Location: Somewhere in PA Watch: All of them... Posts: 10,355	In fact I think it looks really nice on your wrist! Sent from Kevin's Tapatalk! __________________ Patek Philippe Rolex

3 July 2013, 09:10 PM	#12
JorgeCCW "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Jorge Location: Ohio, USA Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP Posts: 4,707	Here is mine It wears a little bigger than you think, good luck

20 June 2013, 11:46 PM	#2
ELITEVIDEOGAMES "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Tom Location: Long Island NY Watch: me sell games Posts: 1,898	I think 42 is perfect for this model IMO. Im sure it would look great on you, 46 would be overkill (you can always get a Panerai). I wish they would get rid of that 1 over-sized register to give it better symmetry. I saw the special boutique only version with a blue face and it was gorgeous.

21 June 2013, 02:35 AM	#3
JP Chestnut Banned Join Date: May 2012 Location: Ann Arbor MI Watch: Rolex Ref 16600 Posts: 3,908	There are already too many 46mm watches. The world doesn't need another one.

21 June 2013, 07:13 PM	#7
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	I think VC should release a thin caliber 2121 Overseas, like the sort of original model 222 at 37-40 mm. If you want big, try the AP ROO. I think there is at least one 48 mm model.

2 July 2013, 11:51 PM	#9
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	I tried one on in Vegas a few months back. Looks WAY too small on the wrist for a 42mm. It wears like a 39mm.

3 July 2013, 02:11 AM	#10
JP Chestnut Banned Join Date: May 2012 Location: Ann Arbor MI Watch: Rolex Ref 16600 Posts: 3,908	^^ It could be your photo but IMO that's how a watch is supposed to look on a wrist. It doesn't look small in the least.

4 July 2013, 06:37 AM	#13
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	Cant judge how it looks from close up pics due to the fisheye effect, need to have at least 12-15 inches gap from camera to arm to get a realistic view.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)