The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 September 2013, 05:11 PM   #1
333president
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Novi MI
Posts: 232
Bracelet Question

Hey Guys,
I don't know if I am just imagining this. But, my Sub-C bracelet is way heavier than the bracelet of my previous sub (which had the older clasp).

Are the older style bracelets hollow, or is the clasp just heavier on the new ones? What's giving the extra weight? Thanks!
333president is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 06:23 PM   #2
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Yes the bracelet is heavier and solid on a newer sub
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 08:36 PM   #3
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,244
Bracelet as well as the clasp should be heavier.
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 09:10 PM   #4
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by 333president View Post
Hey Guys,
I don't know if I am just imagining this. But, my Sub-C bracelet is way heavier than the bracelet of my previous sub (which had the older clasp).

Are the older style bracelets hollow, or is the clasp just heavier on the new ones? What's giving the extra weight? Thanks!
Its mainly the clasp and ceramic insert difference between the 16610 and 116610 total weight about 19 grams or 0.67021oz .
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 09:23 PM   #5
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
I liked the tinny feel of the old bracelets. Just feels more Rolexy. I just made up that word
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 09:32 PM   #6
buke45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by cop414 View Post
Bracelet as well as the clasp should be heavier.
Yep
buke45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 11:25 PM   #7
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
I liked the tinny feel of the old bracelets. Just feels more Rolexy. I just made up that word
I really agree that the lighter subs and bracelets felt better. True of the old Expl.II also IMHO...
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2013, 04:36 AM   #8
333president
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Novi MI
Posts: 232
Thanks guys! So the old brackets were solid though right? (Not hollow)?

The reason I am asking is because I am buying "something" (undecided on model) in yellow gold. Thinking an older Daytona or Yacht. But I don't want an older one in gold if the links are hollow. I want something solid!
333president is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2013, 11:57 AM   #9
DJJon
"TRF" Member
 
DJJon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
I really agree that the lighter subs and bracelets felt better. True of the old Expl.II also IMHO...
Yes there is beauty in the ruggedness and comfort of an old Oyster bracelet. It's lighter weight is part of the attraction.

Then again, the heft and sense of presence that a TT or gold bracelet gives while maintaining a great comfort level is fantastic too.
DJJon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2013, 12:10 PM   #10
samsmart
"TRF" Member
 
samsmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: sam
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Me Tint
Posts: 3,777
I recently installed the subc glidelock bracelet on my 16610. It defiantly made the overall weight of the watch more, but I love that about it. It just feels more rugged now. Plus I am able to keep the original bracelet in new condition while I wear this watch.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Attached Images
 
samsmart is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.