ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 September 2013, 12:42 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,248
|
448 or 372? what would u keep.
hi All:
if you were me, what would you keep between 372 and 448? why? would you keep 448 because it's limited edition? thank you |
16 September 2013, 12:52 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
372
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
16 September 2013, 12:59 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
372. Not a fan of the cali dial personally.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
16 September 2013, 01:22 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,091
|
448 s.e.
448. Just like the 372's, it's a great-looking dial. Sapphire vs. plexi is a matter of taste, ditto for the crown guard. However, the 372 will devalue just as sure as the sun will rise; the 448 is more likely to hold it's value - if not increase. Should you decide sometime down the road that you only want one Panerai in your collection and you prefer the 372, flipping the 448 won't be a problem. You will probably have a good deal of cash left in your pocket...
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora |
16 September 2013, 02:06 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
they are both plexi: CRYSTAL Plexiglas®, 2.8 mm thick (http://www.panerai.com/en/special-ed...-days-pam00448)
|
16 September 2013, 02:09 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
I love the 448 --but if I had to chose between the two, I would keep the 372. As for which will end up being "more valuable," I doubt either watch represents an investment grade decision so I'd just keep the one I like more.
|
16 September 2013, 02:11 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
372
|
16 September 2013, 02:48 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
372 should stay
|
16 September 2013, 03:39 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
372 as the above
|
16 September 2013, 04:21 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: SLF41
Location: Spain
Watch: Changes
Posts: 1,053
|
448
You can always get 372 again in case you miss it ... 448 will be harder to find ... And you might have more occasions to wear the 448 .... I catch myself that for work I prefer a Dressier Radomir over my 372
__________________
Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a |
16 September 2013, 05:43 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Watch: Rolex Deep Sea
Posts: 20
|
372- but beware the price will continue to fall. 448 is ok but it too will fall in price. Panerai has made too many Cali dials.
|
16 September 2013, 06:14 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Joe
Location: USA
Posts: 833
|
Keep 448 of course. You can get 372 any time!
|
16 September 2013, 06:14 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,091
|
My bad, thanks for catching that . The 449 also uses plexi. It's the 424/425 that uses Sapphire.
Just to be clear, the 372 on the secondary market went from retail+ (due to lack of availability in early 2012) to retail- due to ample availability. Supply and demand hard at work. However, OP has already raised the list price of the 372 by €400 / $500 and will probably do it again next year... . Eventually secondary-market prices will raise as OP prices raise and so I think the 372 will sell close to original purchase price as OP continues to drive the price up.
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora |
16 September 2013, 07:10 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Tom
Location: Lowlands
Watch: White 'n Black
Posts: 641
|
Aside from value..:
Depends on your collection. I see the 372 as the ultimate model with arabic numerals / Dial. Great watch. But if youhave many arabic dials, which you are planning to keep, i would keep the cali. Love em both, beautifull watches! Good luck. |
16 September 2013, 07:24 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,248
|
hi guys: thanks for all your input, i was hoping to get 249 before, but didn't have the chance and i like Cali dial alot and it's also limited edition. i think you're right 372 will probably be more easy to find vs. 448.
one thing is all my luminors are 44mm. and my Rads are 47mm. cheers |
16 September 2013, 07:27 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I'd keep 372. Nothing against Cali dials or Rads but the "Vintage" and "California" engravings on the case are dumb IMO.
|
16 September 2013, 12:59 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jake
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Green Submariner
Posts: 751
|
Keep The Dynamic Duo Together
You could not have a better Dynamic Duo than a 372 and a 448.
Keep them both, and enjoy them for a long, long time!!!!!
__________________
Editor & Publisher of Jake's Rolex World Magazine which you can always find at: http://www.RolexMagazine.com |
16 September 2013, 01:49 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I have a soft spot for the 448. You can always repurchase a 372
|
16 September 2013, 02:21 PM | #19 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 53,003
|
If you like both of them, keep 448 now........... And you can always get 372 back anytime......
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
16 September 2013, 03:06 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
|
17 September 2013, 12:45 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: furman south
Location: pittsburgh, pa
Watch: rolex daytona
Posts: 145
|
What would I do?
The question here is what would I do? I would probably sell the 372 and keep the 448 and then totally regret my decision and I would go into a typical WIS tailspin, turning over everything I have while losing thousands of dollars and in a month wind up with another 372 and another 448, being exhausted and swearing that these were the two watches I will keep for the rest of my life.
Now, what do I think you should do? Keep them both, be happy that you have two great watches that represent a brand in an honest and proper manner and figure out which submersible you will add to round out your Panerai collection! |
17 September 2013, 12:52 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Limited edition is a stupid reason to buy/own a watch, keep the one that you like the most.
In my case, it would be the 372. |
17 September 2013, 01:31 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
Quote:
Alex, If you decide to sell that 448, let me know? :-) |
|
18 September 2013, 09:31 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
I would keep the 372 & flip the 448 - neither is an investment piece so go with what you like the most.
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER |
19 September 2013, 02:51 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,091
|
I'll have to disagree with you there. The 448 may be more of an "investment piece" because it's still an affordable SE. Let's take the 127 for example; a definite collector's piece but at today's prices there's no guarantee it will make for a good investment... . The 448 on the other hand should at the very least hold its value (imo).
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora |
19 September 2013, 03:30 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
Quote:
I agree with your disagreement, the 448 should hold value better given the limited production.
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER |
|
19 September 2013, 04:26 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Martin
Location: NY And FLA
Watch: AP ROO Blue Scuba
Posts: 2,695
|
I have both, never wear 448, love my 372… 372
|
19 September 2013, 04:47 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Panos
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: 16710
Posts: 8,704
|
372 and flip the 448 for the 449
|
25 September 2013, 01:39 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
372 by far if you where to have only one Pam, but since I see that you have a few rads and lums it would be nice to see the rest of your collection, maybe depending on the ones you have it's more interesting to have the 448...
|
25 September 2013, 06:32 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Borneo
Posts: 247
|
Keep the 372. I'd prefer a 249 over a 448 though.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.