ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
4 February 2008, 10:23 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: SteelMan
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 719
|
Latest on SD from AD
Visited my AD in Los Angeles today. He told me that there is big news on the SD ... looks like they might announce a 44mm SD whose depth rating will also go up my 500m ...... they might announce it in the rolex fair in 2 months but when it shows up, is another story but there is hoopla going on about the SD... he said if that happens, then the current 4000ft SD is gonna go up in vallue since it production will be closed.
He also showed me the ceramic GMT IIc ... nice heavy watch .. as heavy or heavier than the SD and just as big ...even though the SD sort of is thicker and its srystal sticks out .... Then to top it all, he showed me this gold watch that was 44mm ... i forgot what kind .. real fancy ... that darn thing was so heavy, it made SD look like its was made of plastic .... he said there are only 25 of them in the USA ... I felt it and wore it and man it was huge ,,, makes SD look like a mickie mouse watch ... cost $31,000 and it is sold already .... The he showed me the same watch in white gold andsteel i think ... it was $34,000 ..... So I chatted with him for about 30mins and he gave me a free SD bezel protector ... really cool guy .... |
4 February 2008, 10:27 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Interesting rumour about the SD! Let's see what happens at the Basel Fair.
My wish is that Rolex introduces the slightly domed sapphire crystal that is reserved for the current Day-Dates on ALL Rolex models. That would be cool, IMHO.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
4 February 2008, 10:36 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sterling, Va
Watch: Rolex Gmt Master2
Posts: 276
|
what a shame
if Rolex decides to follow the huge watch-size trend. I like Rolex better when they beat to their own drum.
Bigger and heavier than the standard sized subs and sd's ? Not for me. |
4 February 2008, 11:08 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
So a depth rating of 5640 ft and 1720 meters. Makes no sense to me.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
4 February 2008, 11:22 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
I love all the rumors...
Maybe we should post a sticky full of them to see which ones come true (Hey....I can do that.....I have the power) I wouldn't count out a big watch from Rolex. They have gone through the research and development costs to produce the YM regatta 43mm case. It just doesn't seem right to have this case and use it for only one reference..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
4 February 2008, 01:30 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
|
|
4 February 2008, 11:25 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
|
A bigger SD I can see Rolex make, but why increase the depth rating by only 500m?
__________________
Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series |
4 February 2008, 11:27 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
I think you need to go back and get the info on the watch that makes an SD look like it's a plastic Mickey Mouse watch. I'm curious.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
4 February 2008, 11:43 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: SteelMan
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 719
|
found it on google ... here is thepic ... I saw tis exact thing ... very impressive.... DANG GOLD IS HEAVY!!!
|
4 February 2008, 11:49 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South East USA
Posts: 671
|
|
4 February 2008, 11:52 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
That's a good one!
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
4 February 2008, 11:54 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
Hey,
If the guy gave Steel4Me an SD bezel protector, he must be tellin da trooth. |
4 February 2008, 12:54 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: SteelMan
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 719
|
that's a monster watch .. even the box was bigger ... very very thick and wide, the watch that is ....
|
4 February 2008, 01:40 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Wow, interesting rumor. I'm anxious to see what shows up at Basel.
|
4 February 2008, 07:44 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SEA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 87
|
interesting rumour... There will be changes for SD down the road IMO but the question is always when. So let's see what they announce in 2 months time at basel.
__________________
|
4 February 2008, 10:26 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 185
|
That is depressing news for all but a minority of Rolex customers who want silly big watches. I'm thankful that I already own an SD in 40mm because there is absolutely no way that I will be buying any models that are bigger. What possible benefit is there in a 44mm watch? How can anyone justify a "professional" watch that's so impracticle? Who would pay so much for something that lacks so much in subtlety and is so "manly" it's near homosexual?! (I have no problem with homosexual people - just commenting on fashions that are popular within the culture).
|
4 February 2008, 10:49 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
Quote:
Nipple dials, Subs, Masters....oh, I get it now. I guess it will give a new meaning to the "Show us your Subs" threads. |
|
4 February 2008, 11:11 PM | #18 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
I'm getting the destinct impression that you are refering to my Tutima when you say "gigantic tank watch" - It's actually only fractionally bigger than my SD (it's 43mm with crown, just over 40mm without) but I do find it to be larger than I would like. I have only ever worn it for work. The case size/thickness is the smallest that Tutima could fit the movement in to. Apart from the looks of a 44mm SD is their any reason to have it that large? |
|
5 February 2008, 12:08 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: PETER
Location: Singapore
Watch: 1665 SD
Posts: 768
|
Its seems there's more and more talks on the 'NEW' SD.This should be an interesting year....
|
5 February 2008, 02:55 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
And there lies the answer, it is purely cosmetic, if one likes the look of a watch then that goes a long way to the final decision on the purchase, I would hazzard a guess that few "ugly" watches are bought even though they are technically superior, having said that, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
4 February 2008, 10:42 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
Me, I would buy one! I already have a SD and would love to have another that is different. Do so hope that this rumour is true.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
4 February 2008, 10:53 PM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 185
|
Can they not just produce some new models in the silly big sizes but also keep the existing ones at around 40mm which would give people the choice? (Fashion statement vs. practical everyday watch).
Then when the times change and huge watches are regarded as amusing fashion cliches, Rolex will not have entirely destroyed their brand image. |
5 February 2008, 01:46 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: USA
Watch: the skies
Posts: 1,250
|
I still believe the Yachtmaster II is last years April Fool's joke that Rolex is still laughing about. One VP said they could release anything at any price, no matter how tasteless, and there would be people snatching it up. Funny enough, he was right.
Now how to top that? |
5 February 2008, 03:10 AM | #24 |
Server Advisor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: LA & NY
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,118
|
Steel4Me, what AD was this if you don't mind? I'm in Los Angeles as well and I am always eager to find new good AD's.
|
5 February 2008, 09:05 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Elliott
Location: Prosper, Texas
Watch: Sub 114060 2019
Posts: 410
|
I'm gonna hold onto my Sea-Dweller D-Ser# until I can retire. 15 years more years on the force. Wondering how much mine will be worth, if Rolex changes the SD, mine will be called the "transitional SD" and worth a million. PS I gotta go, I'm late for my appointmrnt with my SHRINK.
Speeders always see the light! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.