The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 November 2013, 08:01 PM   #1
slowhand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 193
Trade a ROO Panda for a RO Jumbo? Talk me out of it

So I made the recent decision to flip two of my PAMs for a Lange 1 MP.. And while that deal isn't even complete yet I'm already thinking of other ways to freshen up the collection, namely to trade my ROO Panda for a 15202 extra thin..

I have a small wrist and instinctively the 15202 should thus fit better, but I have tried a different RO before and it was difficult with the stiff bracelet which doesn't bend at th lugs..

Since I can't find a piece to try on at the moment, any thoughts on the trade? Would you do it?

Cheers and hagwe!
slowhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2013, 09:55 PM   #2
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
In a heartbeat. Do it!
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2013, 10:51 PM   #3
Lamkyle
"TRF" Member
 
Lamkyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Kyle
Location: HK
Watch: Those from my wife
Posts: 669
I would definitely go for it
Lamkyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2013, 11:35 PM   #4
kkchome
"TRF" Member
 
kkchome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Submariner 14060M
Posts: 162
I'd do it in a heartbeat. Love the jumbo.

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex Submariner (14060M) | Explorer 2 White Dial (16570) | Day Date (1803) ♛
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak (15400) | Edward Piguet (15015ST)
Vacheron Constantin Overseas Chronometer (42042) | Overseas Chronograph (49140)
JLC Master Control Hometime (Q1628420)
kkchome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2013, 11:58 PM   #5
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
What's there to debate? Do it.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2013, 11:58 PM   #6
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I love the Lange MP and I would be very happy with that as my dressy watch and so I would therefore prefer a more sporty AP so the ROO, maybe the Diver if you want a change from the Panda. The 15202s lack of seconds hand bothers me as I like my watches to feel alive, its also why I run the chronos on my chronographs.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2013, 11:59 PM   #7
salihy
"TRF" Member
 
salihy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Turkey
Watch: 5550p
Posts: 366
Have both and deeply love the Panda (best of the 42mm ROO series in my opinion) but would do it in a heartbeat. Jumbo is the iconic Audemars Piguet. Keep both if you can :)
salihy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 12:06 AM   #8
orangedial
"TRF" Member
 
orangedial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 1,791
The lug ends of the jumbo are indeed stiffer and do not hug a small wrist well. You should try it out at the boutique. If the fit is alright, I would say go ahead with the trade. It is well worth it!
orangedial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 12:17 AM   #9
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
I would
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 12:24 AM   #10
Dcmk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 264
Talk you out of it? No way. Just do it! No regrets for sure :)
Dcmk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 12:24 AM   #11
Andrés G
"TRF" Member
 
Andrés G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
Go for it!
Andrés G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 01:07 AM   #12
slowhand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 193
Wow looks like the consensus is pretty overwhelming!

What Wayne mentioned is what concerns me tbough. When I tried on a 15300 in the past there was a big gap between the wrist and the bracelet due to the stiff lugs. I imagine the jumbo would be the same. But I'm not sure if it will be like that after the links are removed? That's something the boutique can't do even if they have a piece to try on.

Any small wristers have any feedback? Mine is 6 inches.. On the panda after switching to the Singapore strap the fit is better despite the watch being big.
slowhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 01:28 AM   #13
SixPak
"TRF" Member
 
SixPak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Phong
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,718
Your wrist is quite small so either one will fit big. Having said that I wouldn't pass the chance at a Jumbo.
SixPak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 01:32 AM   #14
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
Go ahead!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 10:57 PM   #15
slowhand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixPak View Post
Your wrist is quite small so either one will fit big. Having said that I wouldn't pass the chance at a Jumbo.
Having a big dial face on the wrist is fine, as I have worn a ROO and Pams before.. I'm more concerned about the fit of the bracelet, and can't stand it if there are unsightly gaps between the bracelet and the wrist, or if the watch can't sit flush..

Would thus like feedback from owners with similar problems, as I won't get the chance to size the braceletat the boutique!
slowhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 11:27 PM   #16
SixPak
"TRF" Member
 
SixPak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Phong
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowhand View Post
Having a big dial face on the wrist is fine, as I have worn a ROO and Pams before.. I'm more concerned about the fit of the bracelet, and can't stand it if there are unsightly gaps between the bracelet and the wrist, or if the watch can't sit flush..

Would thus like feedback from owners with similar problems, as I won't get the chance to size the braceletat the boutique!
I too have small wrist and I see those small gaps with my Diver on rubber strap but less so with my ROO. Not ideal but I've learned to accept and lived with it. It's a compromise I guess for living out the dreams of owning AP.
SixPak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2013, 11:40 PM   #17
slowhand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixPak View Post
I too have small wrist and I see those small gaps with my Diver on rubber strap but less so with my ROO. Not ideal but I've learned to accept and lived with it. It's a compromise I guess for living out the dreams of owning AP.
Its the same mate, my ROO on leather strap has very little gap with good fit. Just not sure if a properly sized bracelet on the jumbo will have the same effect!
slowhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2013, 12:06 AM   #18
slowhand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 193
Name:  ImageUploadedByTapatalk1384092348.488820.jpg
Views: 706
Size:  55.5 KB

And a pic of what I will be trading..
slowhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2013, 01:46 PM   #19
thurgood
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Scott
Location: West coast
Watch: PP/AP/ROLEX
Posts: 391
its totally worth trading your panda for the new jumbo, i also have the 15202 myself, its a real stunning piece, so much history behind this collectors piece, i didn't even try it on before ordering it, not that i had a chance lol, although i've wait months to get it, so i'd say go for it
thurgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2013, 01:51 PM   #20
redsubby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
You really should not go any bigger than a 37mm RO with 6in wrist....
redsubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2013, 01:52 PM   #21
s14roller
"TRF" Member
 
s14roller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
Personally I'd hold onto it and for a few K more, just add a 15300/400.
s14roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2013, 01:57 PM   #22
thurgood
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Scott
Location: West coast
Watch: PP/AP/ROLEX
Posts: 391
BTW the jumbo's a very comfortable watch, the lugs are fine, not stiff to wear at all, at least not to me. it wears a bit bigger than 15300 due to its flatness,it has become my daily wear as well.
thurgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2013, 03:12 PM   #23
woodsworth
"TRF" Member
 
woodsworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 100 Acre Wood
Posts: 959
Love the Panda… but I'd do the trade in a New York minute.

The 15202 is sublime.
woodsworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2013, 04:06 PM   #24
vette boy 52
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Katy, TX
Watch: GMT II-c TT
Posts: 773
LOVE my 15202 Jumbo. I would say go for it.
vette boy 52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2013, 06:46 PM   #25
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
That's a trade I would do!
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2013, 05:53 AM   #26
thurgood
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Scott
Location: West coast
Watch: PP/AP/ROLEX
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowhand View Post
Wow looks like the consensus is pretty overwhelming!

What Wayne mentioned is what concerns me tbough. When I tried on a 15300 in the past there was a big gap between the wrist and the bracelet due to the stiff lugs. I imagine the jumbo would be the same. But I'm not sure if it will be like that after the links are removed? That's something the boutique can't do even if they have a piece to try on.

Any small wristers have any feedback? Mine is 6 inches.. On the panda after switching to the Singapore strap the fit is better despite the watch being big.
Here's my 15202, sits on my wrist perfectly
Attached Images
   
thurgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2013, 09:30 AM   #27
Dcmk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurgood View Post
Here's my 15202, sits on my wrist perfectly
Words fail in the presence of such a sublime beauty ..
Dcmk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2013, 07:54 PM   #28
slowhand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 193
An update of sorts..

Went to my local AP boutique with the aim of trying on the jumbo which unfortunately wasn't in stock.

Did manage to try on a dual time royal oak which is also 39mm, and there was a pretty big gap between the wrist and bracelet. The salesman advised that the jumbo would probably give the same problem, maybe even worse as it had stiffer lugs.

On the other hand tried on the 15450
Which was sublime in fit and feel.. Any thoughts on this model? Would selling a ROO for this be a big step down? If the Jumbo fit right there would be no hesitation!

Pic below

Name:  ImageUploadedByTapatalk1384250012.199438.jpg
Views: 427
Size:  49.8 KB
slowhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2013, 08:27 PM   #29
Exclusivewatches
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: N/A
Location: Antwerpen
Watch: ING MY WIFE
Posts: 734
I dont know man, i am in love with the Panda. That is on my next purchase-list once i've the novelty gold in my hands... I am a large athletic guy though with big wrists so i need larger watches.

Good luck, nice watches either way!
Exclusivewatches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2013, 10:18 PM   #30
Dcmk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowhand View Post
An update of sorts..

Went to my local AP boutique with the aim of trying on the jumbo which unfortunately wasn't in stock.

Did manage to try on a dual time royal oak which is also 39mm, and there was a pretty big gap between the wrist and bracelet. The salesman advised that the jumbo would probably give the same problem, maybe even worse as it had stiffer lugs.

On the other hand tried on the 15450
Which was sublime in fit and feel.. Any thoughts on this model? Would selling a ROO for this be a big step down? If the Jumbo fit right there would be no hesitation!

Pic below

Attachment 440405
IMHO it will be a step down from ROO panda to 15400 I won't do it sorry. But for a Jumbo 15202 I would.
Dcmk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.