|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 November 2013, 09:52 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
I still love mine.... BUT
So, I thought I am getting bored with my 15400. I even post a thread about it. It's too thick! It's dull, it's plain.... so I told myself. But wear it again after 3 weeks, and it suddenly grow on me by leaps and bounds. How I ever even contemplate of selling it???
 Still love mine....   BUT A formidable competitor is on the horizon. It's way more proportional in every way. It seduces with it's sleeker, super-model figure. It's arguably way more iconic.  Need I say more? Had my first real "close-encounter" today. And it's ....   A civil war looming. The battle of the Royal Oaks.  Just sharing some pics and my thoughts. Have a nice day. 
|
|
|
|
21 November 2013, 10:14 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
The royal oak is a work of art...
15202 is a masterpiece.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
21 November 2013, 10:21 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
Well well, that sure is one heck of a battle...
 The blue dial would get my vote but at that point you cannot go wrong with either.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
|
|
|
|
21 November 2013, 10:26 PM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 1,791
|
Quote:
Very well said 
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 November 2013, 11:50 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Phong
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,718
|
There's no better feeling than when you "rediscover" a new
 for an old watch. It's almost like having a "new" watch again. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 12:08 AM
|
#6 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
|
The 15202 wins for me every time.
The 15400 is a great watch, but IMO if there's one AP to own, it's the Jumbo. |
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 03:28 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
Jumbo hands down. My wallet doesn't agree so it looks like a 15400 on the horizon for me.
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 08:34 AM
|
#8 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
400's silver dial is unrivalled but if the 202 appeals more overall then I would go for it, altho lack of seconds hand bothers me as it makes the watch very static.
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 09:36 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Kyle
Location: HK
Watch: Those from my wife
Posts: 669
|
Do it Ben, I'm considering doing the same as well!lol
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 10:39 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
Everybody is telling me to flip the 400 for the Jumbo. I wonder if it is crazy to want to keep both in my collection
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 10:55 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
|
Do it. You won't wear the 15400 anymore. I had both and had to force myself to wear the 15400. No comparison. Sold this.
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 10:56 AM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
|
Kept this.
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 10:58 AM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
|
And just got this to replace the 15400.
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 11:14 AM
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: HR
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: -ing Barts.
Posts: 4,244
|
Hey bro. It never ends. Sky is the limit.
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 11:46 AM
|
#15 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Equator
Posts: 506
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 12:40 PM
|
#16 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Battle Royale!
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 12:56 PM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Cory
Location: NY
Posts: 681
|
I think it's a worthwhile duo, given the night and day difference in the dial and the much flatter, smaller look of the Jumbo. I'm thrilled to have a white 41mm ROC and a Jumbo. They have very different looks. The Jumbo shows much less of those polished highlights, so the 15400 will be much louder and blingier. The Jumbo will be for occasions when you want to "walk quietly with a big stick" as Mike once put it.
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 01:09 PM
|
#18 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,611
|
Both awesome. If I had to go with only one - I think it would be the Jumbo.
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 02:22 PM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Both are great but I say the Jumbo wins
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 08:17 PM
|
#20 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
between those two (white 15400 and jumbo), jumbo wins. if the 15400 were blue, i don't think i would be as tempted to flip (but, the 15202 is awesome).
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 08:26 PM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: James
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 15400
Posts: 246
|
Realistically, great problem to have :)
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 08:33 PM
|
#22 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Rami
Location: Jordan
Watch: Rolex and others
Posts: 825
|
15202 classic icon and a keeper
__________________
"You never know how strong you are, until being strong is your only choice" |
|
|
|
|
22 November 2013, 11:58 PM
|
#24 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Why not have both?
Pros and cons to each IMHO, it really depends on how/when you wear it. Either way it's a winner! |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2013, 04:35 PM
|
#25 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
|
Quote:
Would never buy a watch without it....watching the thing move is half of the fun. |
|
|
|
|
|
24 November 2013, 01:50 AM
|
#26 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Both are great...
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
|
|
|
24 November 2013, 03:13 AM
|
#27 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Great photos!
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
