ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 December 2013, 11:40 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Charles
Location: New York
Posts: 607
|
In praise of the 93150
I know we all love the new style (updated) bracelet and clasp, and why wouldn't we? It's beautifully crafted, solid as a rock and has a spring loaded deployant clasp (long overdue, I know!). I have seen many posts praising the new style bracelet, and have to concur, it is a marvel of Rolex engineering.
As amazing as the new style bracelet / clasps are, I feel compelled to pay tribute to the outgoing, now discontinued 93150 bracelet. My Z series 14060M's (and first Rolex) has held up remarkably well, as my 14060M and I have done most everything together since 2007, as it was (and probably still is) the most versatile watch in my collection. I have worn the watch while playing sports, traveling the world, celebratory dinner and events and pretty much any and everything on between. Sure the hollow links and 501A end links rattle (I now find this somewhat charming, as my Daytona is solid as a rock) but the bracelet serves very well, and despite many critics who will say otherwise, I love my 93150 and wouldn't trade it for an updated bracelet / clasp. Thanks for reading my long winded post. Enjoy the pics. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
14060M 116520 116300 116710BLNR 116500LN |
5 December 2013, 12:58 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
There are many here that feel the same way
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
5 December 2013, 01:08 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,884
|
|
5 December 2013, 01:30 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
Yeah 93150!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Perfect!
__________________
|
5 December 2013, 01:30 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
Hear, hear!
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
5 December 2013, 01:39 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,216
|
Love the comfort and timeless bulletproof design.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
5 December 2013, 01:58 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
|
That rattle is actually a secret function seldom discussed outside of Rolex HQ.
Hikers soon learned the value of it in the wilderness - they would attach it to their hiking jackets where it could easily be read. When hiking the sound of a 93150 rattling alerted the bears that humans are coming, thereby avoiding potentially dangerous encounters. Thus the secret codename: Bare Metal Jacket.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
5 December 2013, 02:12 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
it has proved itself over the years as an excellent design, i am with you heavier is not always better
__________________
watches many |
5 December 2013, 02:59 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
Preaching to the choir here...big fan of the of the non SEL, aluminum inserts and flimsy bracelets and clasps!
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
5 December 2013, 03:03 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 321
|
For all those who love and prefer the old discontinued bracelet and would like to trade their new improved bracelet for the older one please let me know. I will even pay for the shipping.
|
5 December 2013, 03:26 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: John Williams
Location: Alaska outback
Watch: GMT
Posts: 1,051
|
My 93150 has lasted 30 years of wear and it still is in good shape.
|
5 December 2013, 04:26 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
|
|
5 December 2013, 04:27 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: West
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 932
|
Wouldn't want to live without a little rattling.
Bought a NOS 93150 for my sub a month ago. Fab bracelet. |
5 December 2013, 04:53 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
Rattle is good.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
5 December 2013, 05:00 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
Mine
Long live 14060m 2 liners
|
5 December 2013, 05:12 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
|
im shaking my wrist to the rattle as i read this....with the same Z series 14060m on.
|
5 December 2013, 06:15 PM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
Bah humbug....let's hear it for that old shake rattle & roll bracelet w/ the tinfoil clasp.....and no clasp guard like in the 60's......my old 1655 clasps haven't failed yet.
I have nothing against progress but some of the new things may lack soul.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
5 December 2013, 07:27 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
I am a huge fan of the 93150. Two of my three Rolexes have it, and I dare say they are the more comfortable ones. I've been wearing my 14060 on a 93150 for over 13 years with nary a problem.
|
5 December 2013, 07:37 PM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
Never let me down over the years.
|
5 December 2013, 07:56 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
|
Nothing wrong with this bracelet.
|
5 December 2013, 09:47 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: MA
Watch: 16600,16710,Tudor
Posts: 1,372
|
Love my 93150 bracelet. I bought one about a year ago and use it on both my Tudors below......switch back and forth. I have taken my original Tudor bracelet that came with the Big Block and stored it away. I also like the fact of added security with the flip lock on the 93150 when I have it on the 79180 Big Block......the original bracelet has popped open on me a few times. These are great and very comfortable!!
|
5 December 2013, 10:33 PM | #22 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,244
|
Nothing wrong with the old school style!
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.