The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 January 2014, 06:07 AM   #1
StewartUK
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 62
Do you think the platinum Daytona is a good investment?

An unworn platinum Daytona - worth more or less in five years?
StewartUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:09 AM   #2
coralfarmer84
"TRF" Member
 
coralfarmer84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex, PP
Posts: 1,198
I'm going to guess it all depends on what kind of deal you get to begin with. I'd say its worth about the same in 5 years, but more in 10 or so. Especially if rolex keeps raising prices or if precious metals go up. I wouldn't think it would be a great investment from a strict financial standpoint
coralfarmer84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:13 AM   #3
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
No.

High quality luxury jewelry is not an investment.

If you want to buy platinum there are many ways to invest in the commodity..
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:13 AM   #4
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
I don't think any new watch is a great investment but it sure looks and feels great and if bought right will hold it's own and don't expect flooded market with them given price.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:15 AM   #5
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
no

i dont think any mass produced product represents a good investment ,,,, but its as good of way as any in spreading the risk of total bank melt down
i think pre owned . bought well , wont loose money ,,, but thats not the same thing as a good investment.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:15 AM   #6
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Worth less than $75,000 in five years even if new in the plastic.

This doesn't mean I wouldn't buy it if i had the liquid funds available. It is a fantastic watch that will retain a significant amount of value. Put $75k in real estate. Absolutely should be a better long term investment.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:24 AM   #7
Baselman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 1665 GreatWhite SD
Posts: 1,527
Head says: £52400 rrp can be had brand new from grey dealer around 40-42k£ I'd say its one quick way to burn £12k in an instant - a dealer would buy it for even less so expect to be offered around £35k if your lucky. It's not an investment piece but it is a great watch to wear and own - a stunning watch in person if you buy at right price absolutely but not at full rrp for investment at least.
Heart says: I want one badly it's just awesome. Best looking modern daytona - currently !
Baselman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:25 AM   #8
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
I m very confident that it is ,don t think it will be sold more than 4-5 years,if you can get with a 20-25 percent discount it s a very safe/solid investment.
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:27 AM   #9
StewartUK
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 62
better stick to classic cars then, I read it was the best performing asset class over the last 10 years in the UK!!!
StewartUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:28 AM   #10
SixPak
"TRF" Member
 
SixPak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Phong
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,718
There are many things I invest on and watches are not one of them. Now having said that I enjoy each of my watches immensely and that, to me is "worth the investment".
SixPak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 06:31 AM   #11
CDNWatchNut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
A good investment in your enjoyment if you like it enough and have the means! Otherwise, no.
CDNWatchNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 07:10 AM   #12
ARTISAN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: steve
Location: south , east , uk
Watch: all of them
Posts: 448
all depends if they stop production ,,, then we have a different game.
ARTISAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 07:11 AM   #13
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Dumb as an investment.

Genius as a daily watch!
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 07:15 AM   #14
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Less.

If only we had a crystal ball....
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 07:20 AM   #15
Baselman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 1665 GreatWhite SD
Posts: 1,527
Hey they also said the DRSD the milsub and the Paul Newman Daytona were dumb investments I wish I was that dumb.
Baselman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 07:24 AM   #16
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baselman View Post
Hey they also said the DRSD the milsub and the Paul Newman Daytona were dumb investments I wish I was that dumb.
It's a completely different situation these days given the volume Rolex pumps out now.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 07:25 AM   #17
Nidal
"TRF" Member
 
Nidal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC LV
Posts: 1,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Dumb as an investment.

Genius as a daily watch!

Agree. Especially precious metal rolexes. Get a 50k used plat daytona in a few years
Nidal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 07:27 AM   #18
Baselman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 1665 GreatWhite SD
Posts: 1,527
Yeah the platinum daytona is still too high volume a watch as an investment piece really need one at around £25-30k for it to be a solid investment
Baselman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 07:33 AM   #19
cali kid
"TRF" Member
 
cali kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Monterey Co. Ca.
Watch: 16610, 16613, 024
Posts: 439
Beautiful watch but if we all wanted to make money we would have started a unused collection in the 50, 60 & 70's when Subs and other Rolex pieces were cheap.... Prices are so high these days you will never see what vintage pieces are selling for today!
__________________
cali kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 07:35 AM   #20
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baselman View Post
Hey they also said the DRSD the milsub and the Paul Newman Daytona were dumb investments I wish I was that dumb.
I seriously doubt that anyone back when those watches were new, ever contemplated their future values and called them "investments".

Anyone can find items that have appreciated by looking at historical data. In addition the OP asked about a holding period of 5 years, your example cites watches produced ~50 years ago or 10 times longer to hold.

Bottom line, a new mass produced Rolex watch is not an investment in any way shape or form and certainly NOT in that short a time period.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 08:11 AM   #21
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
I seriously doubt that anyone back when those watches were new ever contemplated their future values and called them "investments".

Anyone can find items that have appreciated by looking at historical data. In addition the OP asked about a holding period of 5 years, your example cites watches produced ~50 years ago or 10 times longer to hold.

Bottom line, a new mass produced Rolex watch in not an investment in any way shape or form and certainly NOT in that short a time period.
Agree 100%
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 08:14 AM   #22
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
If you want to lose $3-5,000 a year on your "investment" it's a genius idea...
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 08:15 AM   #23
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by azguy View Post
If you want to lose $3-5,000 a year on your "investment" it's a genius idea...
So in 25 years it will be worth zero. I sure hope you are wrong!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 08:39 AM   #24
Trouble15
"TRF" Member
 
Trouble15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
No.

High quality luxury jewelry is not an investment.

If you want to buy platinum there are many ways to invest in the commodity..
Trouble15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 08:45 AM   #25
petenyc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: pete
Location: NYC
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,011
not an investment
petenyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 08:58 AM   #26
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,511
Horrible investment. The Rolex investment argument is gone. Rolex priced them too high now for any modern Rolex to be considered a investment. They are a luxury lifestyle.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 09:06 AM   #27
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
Horrible investment. The Rolex investment argument is gone. Rolex priced them too high now for any modern Rolex to be considered a investment. They are a luxury lifestyle.
It's not price but supply. Again it is a great investment in joy and poor investment overall. I don't see any luxury item as an investment.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 09:08 AM   #28
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
Does anybody know how many have been produced?
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 09:08 AM   #29
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
i would say bad investment, but that is not why you buy this magnificant watch
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 09:09 AM   #30
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racerdj View Post
Does anybody know how many have been produced?
Yes only Rolex and we will never know.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.