ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 February 2014, 10:02 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 54
|
Subc for first Rolex?
I have been wanting my first Rolex for some time now. I am 34 years old, work long hours, put up with all kinds at work, and have come to a point where I want to reward myself. I have spent countless hours looking up threads on this forums and now I'm hooked! I thought for sure I did not want the Subc for the simple fact that everyone seemed to have "that watch." I wanted to stand out in the crowd. I originally thought I wanted a Platinum Yachtmaster, but now find it too mundane. I like the look of the GMTii Batman, but now find it "too blingy" and don't think the PCL's will be the best to wear as an everyday watch. I like the Hulk and and the 50th anniversay sub model but find it too much green for me, but now have come back around to the classic black model Subc.
I never really considered it a first choice but now cannot stop thinking about getting one. I love the classic good looks, the watch you can wear with a tuxedo or a pair of board shorts, it goes with anything. My only problem is now I want one of each! My wife always says "are you reading about watches again on the forum?!" Guilty. Guilty as charged. From a newbie perspective, anything I might be missing before "diving in?" |
8 February 2014, 10:13 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Nope! Buy one, then the 2nd, then the 3rd, then the 4th...
|
8 February 2014, 10:20 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 36
|
when I got my first sub it was because when i got out of school i did not had the chance to get a graduation ring... so after i worked for a few years and started making great money, I got my sub. a gift from me to me. awsome feeling
already got my second one. . |
8 February 2014, 10:21 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Florida Panhandle
Watch: Sub C LV,
Posts: 490
|
Get a SubC in any configuration (SS, Gold, TT, Green, Black) and don't look back. You'll love it.
|
8 February 2014, 10:22 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Either the SubC or SD would be my 1st choice.
Happy Hunting! |
8 February 2014, 10:23 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: VT
Watch: 16610
Posts: 93
|
I got a black sub for my first one for the same reasons you mentioned. Tux or board shorts it is a show stopper!
I was out with one of my sales reps yesterday who had a GMT master II Pepsi on. I think that might be my second... |
8 February 2014, 10:26 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
|
114060 would be perfect for you.
|
8 February 2014, 10:28 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 9,211
|
Great choice. My first was a 16610 that I bought new in 2003 for a mere $3950! Still have it! Good luck.
|
8 February 2014, 10:29 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 617
|
the black Sub C is such a wonderful watch, I love wearing mine daily and even more than when I had the green sub!
|
8 February 2014, 11:16 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
Go for it, the subc rocks
|
8 February 2014, 11:20 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Crazy thing is I purchased a TT Sub around the same time and paid something like $4600, now the stainless models are going for double of what I paid for the TT!! Wish I didnt sell it........ |
|
8 February 2014, 11:24 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
I don't know about or care about standing out but the SubC seems the watch for you.
Get it and you'll have no regrets, the black one of course. |
8 February 2014, 11:25 AM | #13 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
Great first watch...Go for it!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
8 February 2014, 11:30 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Brian
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 205
|
Awesome first choice for a Rolex. From the sound of it, you certainly deserve it. When I'm having a tough day at work, I look at my sub, smile, and get back at it. You can always add something with a little more bling down the road. Let us know what you decide...with pics of course.
|
8 February 2014, 11:35 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
|
Great first watch... But don't let it fool you in thinking it's your last rolex. I would try buying from trusted seller here to save a lot of money.
|
8 February 2014, 11:36 AM | #16 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,242
|
Any variation of the Submariner will be a great first Rolex.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
8 February 2014, 11:38 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 54
|
I believe I can get 15% off from my local AD from the $8550 retail price. Is that a good enough deal to buy brand new?
|
8 February 2014, 11:45 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,852
|
Sub C was my first Rolex last year. I think it is a real classic having lots of Rolex DNA.
GMT BLNR was second and it is a bit more lively than the Sub. |
8 February 2014, 11:50 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Kyle
Location: NC
Watch: DJ41 White Romans
Posts: 414
|
Absolutely. I did it for my first Rolex last weekend. Can't stop looking at it. Very fun to wear.
|
8 February 2014, 11:56 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
As you said, dive in!!
|
8 February 2014, 11:57 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
The Sub C is a true icon and a perfect way to start a collection...go for it!
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
8 February 2014, 12:01 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
|
I bought a new 16613 TT Bluesy for a mere 5200.00 back in Feb. 1997 and still have it. It is on the way back from a service done by Rik in Florida. The UPS man will be at my door Monday mornin'!
|
8 February 2014, 12:19 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Clarita CA
Posts: 1,028
|
A little over a year ago I was faced with the exact same situation. I chose the Sub C Date and I can't tell you enough how happy I am. I honestly thought by now the excitement would have worn off or at least worn down a little but it hasn't. I've become very involved here with TRF. I've seen many different models and variations of models and I can tell you that if I could do it over again I wouldn't change a thing. People ask me what my grail watch is and believe it or not my Sub is that watch. My brother gave me an Explorer I as a gift and I hate to say this but I really don't wear it that often. I will never sell my Sub. There may be other additions but there will never be a watch that I feel this way about. NEVER. Good luck to you and please let us know what you decide.
|
8 February 2014, 12:26 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: CA
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 618
|
Have you checked on a BNIB price from a TRF trusted seller first?
|
8 February 2014, 12:40 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Penna
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,658
|
I thought the same thing. I wanted a black Sub C but everyone had one. I saw them everywhere. So I bought the 116610LV to be different. Then I decided that the black Sub C it was so classic in black. So I bought both. I can be different and have a classic. I recommend getting going that way.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
__________________
Rolex Sub-126610LV Rolex Sub- 126613LB Rolex GMT BLRO 126710 Rolex GMT BLNR Rolex Datejust 16220 |
8 February 2014, 12:42 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 458
|
I had the same dilemma for the past week. This afternoon I picked up my first Rolex, a GMT Master II Stainless steel! I think I got a good deal; 12% off, no tax, free saturday next day delivery. Can't wait to get mine!
|
8 February 2014, 01:28 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
|
Look, I am guilty. A Submariner Date was my first Rolex. I got it right before the ceramic models started being released. At the time I didn't know much about Rolex as a brand and certainly the Submariner is a great starter piece. If your heart is set on it, I'd say go no date for a cleaner look.
All of that said, I think in time you might wish you longed for something else as your initial piece. Do you really need a Submariner? Do you dive or spend that much time in the water? If the answer is even remotely yes then sure go for it, but I am willing to bet almost any of Rolex offerings are going to meet your needs. Why not consider a Datejust or Explorer? Hell I think you were on the money considering a GMT Master II. A GMT complication has more utility for the average person than a depth rated, dive bezeled piece. If I could go back I'd start with either an Explorer or GMT Master II. If your heart is just set on the Submariner then ignore my advice, just trying to give a different perspective. There's still a reason all of us "collectors" (and I throw myself in there despite my humble collection) all have a Submariner somewhere in there. |
8 February 2014, 02:06 PM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
|
SS Sub.
|
8 February 2014, 06:50 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
The fact that many guys pick the SS Sub-C shouldn't sway you away from getting one of the best (sports) watches ever made. Get it, enjoy it, and start thinking of your 2nd and 3rd Rolex
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
8 February 2014, 06:56 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London
Posts: 1,894
|
The Sub C is the best first Rolex and I think it will be the perfect watch for you. Don't buy one of the other sports Rolexes just to be different. The sub c embodies everything great about Rolex and it will be a watch you will treasure forever.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.