The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 March 2014, 02:44 AM   #1
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
Is the DSSD a dying breed?

With the release of the SD4000 what are everyone's thoughts on Rolex's plans for the DSSD?

Seems a bit much to have the sub, SD, and DSSD in their lineup...

If they discontinue the DSSD, we're looking at quite a rare piece...
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 02:45 AM   #2
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
discontinued? no.

they surely are scaling back production, though.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 02:46 AM   #3
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschneid View Post
With the release of the SD4000 what are everyone's thoughts on Rolex's plans for the DSSD?

Seems a bit much to have the sub, SD, and DSSD in their lineup...

If they discontinue the DSSD, we're looking at quite a rare piece...
Yes we would be. I have only seen 3 or 4 in the wild.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 02:47 AM   #4
JJL
"TRF" Member
 
JJL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Watch: 1680 Red & 16622
Posts: 2,449
Theyd be crazy to get rid of it. There is definitely a target audience for this watch just based on it's size alone. Many people that don't care for Rolexes due to their mostly 40mm offerrings love and own this watch.

With that being said, it's too big for me.
JJL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 02:48 AM   #5
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJL View Post
Theyd be crazy to get rid of it. There is definitely a target audience for this watch just based on it's size alone. Many people that don't care for Rolexes due to their mostly 40mm offerrings love and own this watch.

With that being said, it's too big for me.
Good point, a good first Rolex for any Breitling or Panerai converts
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 02:58 AM   #6
MortgageGuy
"TRF" Member
 
MortgageGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
I don't see a discontinuation either, just another option IMO
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki
MortgageGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 03:00 AM   #7
SeamasterGMT
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DeepSea
Posts: 822
No. It is their top of the range dive watch. It gets a double page spread in the catalog. Two years of R&D for 5 years of sales?
SeamasterGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 03:06 AM   #8
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
There is a market for the DSSD for sure.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 03:17 AM   #9
14060m
"TRF" Member
 
14060m's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
DSSD will live
__________________
14060m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 03:26 AM   #10
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJL View Post
Theyd be crazy to get rid of it. There is definitely a target audience for this watch just based on it's size alone. Many people that don't care for Rolexes due to their mostly 40mm offerrings love and own this watch.

With that being said, it's too big for me.
I agree. It's the Rolex for the guy who's first nice watch was a PAM.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 03:40 AM   #11
SubGunner
"TRF" Member
 
SubGunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Planet Ocean
Watch: Sub 16610 "M"
Posts: 182
I'm sure sales will really dwindle when a buyer tries on both in-store. And don't forget the group of DSSD owners that wanted an updated SD instead of a Sub, so they settled on the DSSD after the original SD was discontinued. I would also wager there will be some DSSD trades happening for the SD.
SubGunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 03:41 AM   #12
IAN1
2024 Pledge Member
 
IAN1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: California
Watch: A Rolex of course.
Posts: 1,067
DSSD is Rolex's version of the Bugatti Vayron. It's an engineering marvel and tour de force.
IAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 03:43 AM   #13
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Now that the SD 4000 is out, the DSSD will fill a niche for the ostentatious crowd until the big watch trend fades and it still might hang on.

I was really skeptical that we'd ever see another SD, but it looks like Ken was right all along.

I'll never get tired of my 14060M, so it's all immaterial to me.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 03:50 AM   #14
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubGunner View Post
And don't forget the group of DSSD owners that wanted an updated SD instead of a Sub, so they settled on the DSSD after the original SD was discontinued. I would also wager there will be some DSSD trades happening for the SD.
This is an important point. If you wanted a less ubiquitous (than a Sub) Rolex diver, you either hunted down an old 16600, bought a DSSD, or just got the Sub for all the nice updates. Now there's a new, and extremely appealing, option.

I was trying to decide between hunting down a nice 16600 and buying a new 114060. I've now lost all interest in the Sub. If I'm going new, it's going to be this new SD4000.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 03:58 AM   #15
SubGunner
"TRF" Member
 
SubGunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Planet Ocean
Watch: Sub 16610 "M"
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
I was trying to decide between hunting down a nice 16600 and buying a new 114060. I've now lost all interest in the Sub. If I'm going new, it's going to be this new SD4000.
Similar circumstances to you...I love my 16610, but really do like the new updates of the SubC. I tried on the DSSD, and just was immediately turned off. I thought the SubC was the "fall back", but even then kind of missed the classic lines of the Sub. Rolex sure does have a winner with the new SD. As far as I'm concerned, this is every bit as tough as the DSSD, with the SubC updates, and classic lines. What a homerun!
SubGunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 04:08 AM   #16
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubGunner View Post
Similar circumstances to you...I love my 16610, but really do like the new updates of the SubC. I tried on the DSSD, and just was immediately turned off. I thought the SubC was the "fall back", but even then kind of missed the classic lines of the Sub. Rolex sure does have a winner with the new SD. As far as I'm concerned, this is every bit as tough as the DSSD, with the SubC updates, and classic lines. What a homerun!
I agree. The new Subs are really nice, but I just can't come to terms with the lugs. Even the slightly smaller GMT2 lugs are so much better to my eyes. If Rolex included a chamfer on the new SD4000 it would be perfect, but even without it's close enough for me.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 04:10 AM   #17
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschneid View Post
With the release of the SD4000 what are everyone's thoughts on Rolex's plans for the DSSD?

Seems a bit much to have the sub, SD, and DSSD in their lineup...

If they discontinue the DSSD, we're looking at quite a rare piece...
Actually...there are 4 models at the moment:
1.) Submariner
2.) Submariner Date
3.) Sea-Dweller
4.) DSSD
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 04:38 AM   #18
Der Meister
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAN1 View Post
DSSD is Rolex's version of the Bugatti Vayron. It's an engineering marvel and tour de force.
+1, it will be surprising that Rolex stop the production! They need a large watch in their catalogue for some people who need that...
Der Meister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 04:40 AM   #19
Nidal
"TRF" Member
 
Nidal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC LV
Posts: 1,821
There has been lots of debate about the DSSD monster. The SD will be a happy middle.
Nidal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 04:53 AM   #20
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art 1 View Post
Yes we would be. I have only seen 3 or 4 in the wild.
I've only seen 3 other SD 4000's.

Zero 116660's
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 05:08 AM   #21
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
I posted this in another thread:


I rather doubt it. The DSSD is their engineering flagship, at least in the Professional line, so discontinuing it would send a negative message

It was never going to be a high-volume seller compared to say the Sub or GMT, but I suspect (and of course we have no actual sales data) that sales tick along well enough.
It's not as though Rolex would be in any financial strife if sales were poor. I expect it will remain in the catalogue until a new 'engineering statement' watch comes along, or an entirely new line of divers is rolled out (not likely for several years!)
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 05:21 AM   #22
Avs Fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,512
I've never seen another SD4000 in the wild, and only one DSSD at a GTG.
Avs Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 05:25 AM   #23
MrSimba
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: uk
Watch: DSSD & ExpII
Posts: 259
As a DSSD owner the SD at 40mm would just be too small for me - note I say 'me' not 'everyone'! - IF Rolex had introduced the SD at 42mm then that would have dented the DSSD market but at 40mm it'll be the Sub C market it eats into not the DSSD.
MrSimba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 05:28 AM   #24
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSimba View Post
As a DSSD owner the SD at 40mm would just be too small for me - note I say 'me' not 'everyone'! - IF Rolex had introduced the SD at 42mm then that would have dented the DSSD market but at 40mm it'll be the Sub C market it eats into not the DSSD.
I think there are plenty of people who talked themselves into a DSSD when they would have liked something smaller. I almost did it myself. The new SD4000 is going to impact both the Sub and the DSSD - as a percentage of lost sales to total sales, who knows which is more hit?
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 05:32 AM   #25
Beef
"TRF" Member
 
Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,824
If I bought a DSSD, and might yet, it would be in large part because I do believe it will be produced in limited numbers. Thus, ultimately may be of some value to my kids. I haven't bought any of my Rolexes as a pure investment, just bought them because I liked them. But the DSSD may be a decent investment piece. In 25 or so years. If I bought a new SD 4000, it'd be because its a pure continuation of the SD line that I love. Even with the ceramic bezel that I don't.
__________________
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."
"So you have enemies. Good. You must have stood up for something, sometime in your life." Winston Churchill
Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 05:37 AM   #26
stevedssd
"TRF" Member
 
stevedssd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psmith View Post
I posted this in another thread:


I rather doubt it. The DSSD is their engineering flagship, at least in the Professional line, so discontinuing it would send a negative message

It was never going to be a high-volume seller compared to say the Sub or GMT, but I suspect (and of course we have no actual sales data) that sales tick along well enough.
It's not as though Rolex would be in any financial strife if sales were poor. I expect it will remain in the catalogue until a new 'engineering statement' watch comes along, or an entirely new line of divers is rolled out (not likely for several years!)
+1

Depending on price the SD 4000 will impact on Sub and DSSD sales to some extent but the Deepsea is indeed the "engineering statement" watch that will keep it in the catalogue for quite a while yet.
stevedssd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 05:39 AM   #27
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avs Fan View Post
I've never seen another SD4000 in the wild, and only one DSSD at a GTG.
Probably because the SD4000 was only announced today.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 06:31 AM   #28
horseco
"TRF" Member
 
horseco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
They have no reason to stop producing the DSSD, the tooling, machining, marketing, research & development have all ready been payed for. The people who like them, LOVE them, & for those of us who dislike them, don't HATE them enough to abandon the Rolex brand because of their existence in the collection... I think sales will remain slow but steady for the DSSD...
horseco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 06:49 AM   #29
660ft
"TRF" Member
 
660ft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: LA
Watch: 1680
Posts: 161
The DSSD will stick around in the Rolex lineup, but there will be a lot of them for sale in the secondary market.
660ft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2014, 06:52 AM   #30
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
No. It is not even dry between the ears yet. It will be around for years.

I was a bit scared today, when the first picture on TRF I saw of the SDC was photoshopped with a depth rating of 3900m.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.