ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rockland · 28 July 2014, 12:43 AM

I have a Omega POC 9300 as my only watch. Need a 2nd watch to mix things up. The Omega is just too heavy for a daily watch, and I am 6'5", 230 with 7 1/4" wrists.

Thinking of SubC or BLNR.

Which one?

Brucie D · 28 July 2014, 12:46 AM

Both are great. I'm having a blast wearing this one:

Clutch Cargo · 28 July 2014, 12:51 AM

A Subc (no date) is the perfect first (or only) Rolex. It's simple understated elegance is a classic that will never go out of style.

Rockland · 28 July 2014, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clutch Cargo

A Subc (no date) is the perfect first (or only) Rolex. It's simple understated elegance is a classic that will never go out of style.

Yes, but I need/like the date on my watch.

sea-dweller · 28 July 2014, 12:58 AM

SubC between the two for me, but buy what "sings" to you!

Deyn Man · 28 July 2014, 12:58 AM

Either really... The 114060 could be the one and only watch as mentioned! :-)
GMT for the added complication I guess... :-)

Steel28 · 28 July 2014, 01:04 AM

Sub C

Chelseafan · 28 July 2014, 01:05 AM

Sub...

Mack Bolan · 28 July 2014, 01:09 AM

Sub c

Mr DateJust · 28 July 2014, 01:12 AM

GMT. Also flip the Omega. A watch that is too heavy to wear all day is not useful. That way you could be on your way to having both the Sub and the GMT lol.

WWC · 28 July 2014, 01:15 AM

Sub!

Ed Man · 28 July 2014, 01:17 AM

Sub!

HL65 · 28 July 2014, 01:17 AM

Which do you prefer more? Totally personal so surely one will appeal more to you.

macduffi · 28 July 2014, 01:19 AM

I'll let my SubC speak for itself.

cityscape · 28 July 2014, 01:22 AM

Both look great in photos (and in person), but the SubC looked better on my wrist. I actually had wanted it to be the other way around, so I could own a less prevalent watch. A few things that I noticed in person...

*The SubC wears slightly bigger as the bezel marking appear to "extend" the dial as opposed to form a border around it

*The blue on the BLNR is beautiful and changes from royal to deep navy

*I chose the (114060) SubC, since I really preferred the clean dial (cost was not a factor)

*I have polished center links on my 116622 and do like them. That said, the brushed center links are a better fit for my everyday lifestyle (looks a bit off wearing PCLs with gym clothes IMHO).

*I heard others make a big deal about the Glidelock clasp and didn't appreciate it enough until I owned the SubC - it's fantastic

*I like the idea of putting other straps on at some point and the SubC seemed more versatile here (have only judged through pictures on here)

*While not a huge factor - if you buy used - the SubC is less risky if you change your mind since I believe that it will take less of a hit over a year of ownership (from used price) as the BLNR

All of this said, they are 2 of my favorite models and I may end up buying the BLNR at some point. As a first (and potentially only) Rolex, I would choose the SubC. The choice b/w date (116610) and no date (114060) may weigh differently for you, since you have a clean dial on the PO and may prefer to have a classic cyclops on your Rolex.

nickb732 · 28 July 2014, 01:28 AM

My brother has both. I'd pick the BLNR

The Libertine · 28 July 2014, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clutch Cargo

A Subc (no date) is the perfect first (or only) Rolex. It's simple understated elegance is a classic that will never go out of style.

Can't go wrong with this advice!

jhcam8 · 28 July 2014, 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rockland

I have a Omega POC 9300 as my only watch. Need a 2nd watch to mix things up. The Omega is just too heavy for a daily watch, and I am 6'5", 230 with 7 1/4" wrists.

Thinking of SubC or BLNR.

Which one?

I'd consider a Fifty Fathoms and some Panerai models. For a guy your size they'd look great.

The SubC has more of a tool vibe than the BLNR, so what look are you seeking?

travisb · 28 July 2014, 01:50 AM

Common dilemma around here.
Try them both on.
I own both but prefer the Sub.

Rockland · 28 July 2014, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr DateJust

GMT. Also flip the Omega. A watch that is too heavy to wear all day is not useful. That way you could be on your way to having both the Sub and the GMT lol.

Yes, but POC 9300 was my first real watch. For sentimental reasons, want to keep it. And don't wish to make habit of buying retail selling wholesale. Although I got 30% off list.

DCgator · 28 July 2014, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rockland

I have a Omega POC 9300 as my only watch. Need a 2nd watch to mix things up. The Omega is just too heavy for a daily watch, and I am 6'5", 230 with 7 1/4" wrists.

Thinking of SubC or BLNR.

Which one?

Consider these and try them on at an AD and choose the one that sings to you.

Omega PO GMT blue dial w/ rubber strap, 43.5mm

Omega Aqua Terra GMT, 43.5mm, get leather and rubber strap

Rolex EXP II Polar or Black, 42mm

Rolex BLNR, 40mm

Pam 88 and other Panerai GMT models

Happy hunting Rockland!

T01 · 28 July 2014, 02:12 AM

Sub

mdavidson217 · 28 July 2014, 02:23 AM

BLNR. It was my first ROLEX and I'm very happy. I'm not to worried about resale because I plan on giving all my watches to my grandchildren

franzy · 28 July 2014, 02:24 AM

Both are GREAT. Out of those two I would say the BLNR because of the extra complication. I am also a huge fan of the PCL's. Take your time and make sure you are 100% sure before you purchase. It took me 2 years to decide on my first (I kept going back and forth on 4 or 5 different SS models). In the end I picked the GMT for the reasons mentioned above. Good luck in your decision.

bearone2 · 28 July 2014, 02:34 AM

blnr

Urosfan · 28 July 2014, 03:20 AM

Subc

AngryApe · 28 July 2014, 03:22 AM

I vote Sub-C for versatility. I'm also an admitted nd fan.

bp1000 · 28 July 2014, 03:27 AM

Sub

Huge fan of the BLNR but as a first rolex a black sub is an excellent choice.

My take is, I wear my gmt a lot, its the none ceramic, old bracelet and case shape. Very comfortable very versatile watch.

Every time I put my subc on I marvel at how stunning it looks. Everything about it just works and the new bracelet on the c is a real step up.

Get the sub.

I have the green c as my perfect sub line up is a green sub and an old black aluminium classic case shape non date.

tfly212 · 28 July 2014, 03:33 AM

Can't really go wrong with either...to me what sets the BLNR apart is that you just won't see that many of them (I still haven't seen another in person...but I saw a chef in LA on Nadia G's Bitchin' Kitchen wearing one yesterday).

iWally · 28 July 2014, 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brucie D

Both are great. I'm having a blast wearing this one:

Phhoooaarrrrr That picture is mind-blowing

28 July 2014, 12:43 AM	#1
Rockland "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: United States Posts: 205	SubC or BLNR I have a Omega POC 9300 as my only watch. Need a 2nd watch to mix things up. The Omega is just too heavy for a daily watch, and I am 6'5", 230 with 7 1/4" wrists. Thinking of SubC or BLNR. Which one?

28 July 2014, 01:15 AM	#11
WWC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Home Posts: 1,438	Sub! __________________ Royal Oak 15500ST Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 \| Luminor GMT PAM 00335 Aquanaut 5167A-001 \| Nautilus 5712/1A-001 Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 \| DEEPSEA 126660 \| Explorer 214270 \| GMT Master II BLRO 16710 \| GMT Master II VTNR 126720 \| Submariner LV 16610 \| Sky-Dweller 326139 \| Prince Oysterdate 90630

28 July 2014, 01:17 AM	#13
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,006	Which do you prefer more? Totally personal so surely one will appeal more to you. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

28 July 2014, 01:19 AM	#14
macduffi "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Real Name: Todd James Location: North NJ, USA Watch: 116619LB & 228239 Posts: 459	I'll let my SubC speak for itself. Attached Images __________________ Time heals what reason cannot. -Seneca

28 July 2014, 01:28 AM	#16
nickb732 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Nicholas Location: UK Posts: 2,630	My brother has both. I'd pick the BLNR __________________ Nick

28 July 2014, 12:46 AM	#2
Brucie D "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Bruce Location: Saskatoon SK CAN Watch: DJ / BLNR / SUBCLV Posts: 1,381	Both are great. I'm having a blast wearing this one:

28 July 2014, 12:51 AM	#3
Clutch Cargo "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: Lynn Location: Dallas, Texas Posts: 452	A Subc (no date) is the perfect first (or only) Rolex. It's simple understated elegance is a classic that will never go out of style.

28 July 2014, 12:58 AM	#5
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	SubC between the two for me, but buy what "sings" to you!

28 July 2014, 12:58 AM	#6
Deyn Man "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Dean Location: Philippines Posts: 1,037	Either really... The 114060 could be the one and only watch as mentioned! :-) GMT for the added complication I guess... :-)

28 July 2014, 01:04 AM	#7
Steel28 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Canada Watch: BLNR Posts: 1,019	Sub C

28 July 2014, 01:05 AM	#8
Chelseafan Banned Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: London Posts: 542	Sub...

28 July 2014, 01:09 AM	#9
Mack Bolan Banned Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Anywhere but here Watch: Submariner Posts: 259	Sub c

28 July 2014, 01:12 AM	#10
Mr DateJust "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Glasgow, UK Watch: 16570 Posts: 909	GMT. Also flip the Omega. A watch that is too heavy to wear all day is not useful. That way you could be on your way to having both the Sub and the GMT lol.

28 July 2014, 01:17 AM	#12
Ed Man Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Edmond Location: Michigan Watch: 114060/116334 Posts: 737	Sub!

28 July 2014, 01:22 AM	#15
cityscape "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Chris Location: NYC Posts: 82	Both look great in photos (and in person), but the SubC looked better on my wrist. I actually had wanted it to be the other way around, so I could own a less prevalent watch. A few things that I noticed in person... The SubC wears slightly bigger as the bezel marking appear to "extend" the dial as opposed to form a border around it The blue on the BLNR is beautiful and changes from royal to deep navy I chose the (114060) SubC, since I really preferred the clean dial (cost was not a factor) I have polished center links on my 116622 and do like them. That said, the brushed center links are a better fit for my everyday lifestyle (looks a bit off wearing PCLs with gym clothes IMHO). I heard others make a big deal about the Glidelock clasp and didn't appreciate it enough until I owned the SubC - it's fantastic I like the idea of putting other straps on at some point and the SubC seemed more versatile here (have only judged through pictures on here) *While not a huge factor - if you buy used - the SubC is less risky if you change your mind since I believe that it will take less of a hit over a year of ownership (from used price) as the BLNR All of this said, they are 2 of my favorite models and I may end up buying the BLNR at some point. As a first (and potentially only) Rolex, I would choose the SubC. The choice b/w date (116610) and no date (114060) may weigh differently for you, since you have a clean dial on the PO and may prefer to have a classic cyclops on your Rolex.

28 July 2014, 01:50 AM	#19
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,489	Common dilemma around here. Try them both on. I own both but prefer the Sub.

28 July 2014, 02:12 AM	#22
T01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: T Location: AZ, NV, CA Posts: 6,490	Sub

28 July 2014, 02:23 AM	#23
mdavidson217 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Illinois Posts: 86	BLNR. It was my first ROLEX and I'm very happy. I'm not to worried about resale because I plan on giving all my watches to my grandchildren

28 July 2014, 02:24 AM	#24
franzy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Tom Location: USA Posts: 1,264	Both are GREAT. Out of those two I would say the BLNR because of the extra complication. I am also a huge fan of the PCL's. Take your time and make sure you are 100% sure before you purchase. It took me 2 years to decide on my first (I kept going back and forth on 4 or 5 different SS models). In the end I picked the GMT for the reasons mentioned above. Good luck in your decision.

28 July 2014, 02:34 AM	#25
bearone2 Banned Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Arizona Watch: 116713LN Posts: 402	blnr

28 July 2014, 03:20 AM	#26
Urosfan "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: NYC Watch: Me now Posts: 19,372	Subc

28 July 2014, 03:22 AM	#27
AngryApe "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Beau Wilson Location: Buford, GA Posts: 81	I vote Sub-C for versatility. I'm also an admitted nd fan.

28 July 2014, 03:27 AM	#28
bp1000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Midlands, UK Posts: 4,973	Sub Huge fan of the BLNR but as a first rolex a black sub is an excellent choice. My take is, I wear my gmt a lot, its the none ceramic, old bracelet and case shape. Very comfortable very versatile watch. Every time I put my subc on I marvel at how stunning it looks. Everything about it just works and the new bracelet on the c is a real step up. Get the sub. I have the green c as my perfect sub line up is a green sub and an old black aluminium classic case shape non date.

28 July 2014, 03:33 AM	#29
tfly212 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: Terry Location: New York City Watch: Daytona or BLNR Posts: 491	Can't really go wrong with either...to me what sets the BLNR apart is that you just won't see that many of them (I still haven't seen another in person...but I saw a chef in LA on Nadia G's Bitchin' Kitchen wearing one yesterday).

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)