ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: SD or SS GMT II ceramic | |||
SD | 31 | 29.81% | |
SS GMT II ceramic | 73 | 70.19% | |
Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
31 March 2008, 12:58 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Watch: 116718 green
Posts: 1,944
|
SD vs SS GMT-c
Now this is the question!!! If you had to choose only one Rolex which one of the two would it be? Cost is not a problem
__________________
|
31 March 2008, 01:35 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Nik
Location: CT
Watch: SS GMT II C
Posts: 69
|
that was my same choice.... originally going for the SD... ended up with the gmtiic. I think having both is the best option - Nik
|
31 March 2008, 02:00 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 469
|
I think GMT II C...but it's only me. both are great watches. I love the upgrades on GMT II C. can't go wrong with either one...
|
31 March 2008, 02:02 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Ken
Location: toronto
Watch: 18K YG Day Date
Posts: 2,985
|
Sd for me!!!
__________________
DAUNWAUN |
31 March 2008, 02:05 AM | #5 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
GMT II C all the way
All of the updates make it unique
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
31 March 2008, 02:24 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
|
31 March 2008, 06:10 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: US
Posts: 23
|
Was in a similar scenario- went in looking at a sub, walked out with the GMT IIC and couldn't be happier!
|
31 March 2008, 06:17 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 1,081
|
This is a great watch
|
31 March 2008, 06:56 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Africa
Posts: 1,127
|
Had both and decided to keep the GMTII-C - both are great watches but IMO the GMT just shades it..........................then again if you are an adventurer then the SD is the one to go for (no polished links!!)
|
31 March 2008, 07:29 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Simon
Location: UK
Watch: OP and daytona
Posts: 1,783
|
GMT IIC, all the way.
|
31 March 2008, 07:32 AM | #11 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
|
31 March 2008, 07:32 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,460
|
X2
__________________
|
31 March 2008, 07:35 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: John david
Location: California
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 49
|
GMT IIc FTW!
|
31 March 2008, 07:48 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
SD for me.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
31 March 2008, 09:26 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: SteelMan
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 719
|
just remember: if it ain't a diver, it ain't a survivor .... so yes, you guessed it: SD ...
|
31 March 2008, 09:31 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
|
Well, I was all for the SD, until recently when I flip-flopped to the GMTc. Both are great watches, it's just that I now seem to "rediscover" how great the GMTc is.
__________________
Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series |
31 March 2008, 09:33 AM | #17 |
Non-Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UTC-5 Toronto, ON
Posts: 515
|
The SD
The ultimate and quitessential tool diver - the SD.
James
__________________
"AUT VIAM INVENIAM AUT FACIAM - "I'll either find a way or make one" |
31 March 2008, 10:33 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 16610 1675 Speedy
Posts: 1,057
|
Sd
__________________
|
31 March 2008, 10:45 AM | #19 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
The GMT II C has a huge lead so far
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
31 March 2008, 11:28 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: GU
Posts: 124
|
Well knowing that something new is coming on BaselWorld 2008 and getting a tease from Rolex Website, I guess its better to see what's the new one and a lot here are speculation that indeed it could be a NEW SD and fortunately, its one of your choices. So try to wait and see but if you're talking about now as in this moment, I'll take the GMT-II C
|
31 March 2008, 11:51 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,571
|
I would pick the GMT II C, mainly because occasionally I could use the GMT Hand and because I don't want to be more than 100 meters deep anyway.
|
31 March 2008, 12:23 PM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 981
|
prefer SD just because I do not like cyclops.
GMT 2 is a beautilful watch.. so you can't really go wrong with either. |
31 March 2008, 05:54 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: HongKong
Posts: 72
|
It's hard to make a choice. GMT II , I think, but I also like my SD very much.
|
31 March 2008, 09:23 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT Master II C
Posts: 418
|
GMT IIc FTW!
__________________
116710 GMT Master II Ceramic Black Bezel M Serial (HAVE) 16710 GMT Master II Coke (HAD) 16622 Yacht-Master Platinum / SS (WANT) 116509 Daytona WG Meteorite (GRAIL)
|
31 March 2008, 10:25 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
Posts: 20
|
GMT IIc ... for now
The GMT IIc has the edge for now with its latest improvements. It is a marvellous looking watch. My only berievement would be the price being charged for it.
However, let's see if there is a new SD announced at Basel 2008. That could make this a really competitive poll. Right now it's the GMT IIc for me over the SD. |
31 March 2008, 10:29 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Gmt Ii-c...
...To me, because look more elegant to me. But I like both, if I must choose one between 'em, I prefer GMT II-C.
|
1 April 2008, 12:53 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
SeaDweller
I'd still pick the SeaDweller for its smart clean looks. Can't wait for Basel's release of a new SD.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
1 April 2008, 02:24 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Steven
Location: the OC
Watch: SS GMT II-C, SD
Posts: 186
|
I picked the shiny one. Miss my SD but I don't miss the clasp.
|
1 April 2008, 02:31 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Clarence
Location: A 'fine' city
Watch: 16613 & 116660
Posts: 265
|
Both~!....hee...
__________________
Rolex TT Submariner Date Blue Dial (Ref#116613LB) Rolex Deep Sea Sea Dweller (Ref#116660) Rolex 18K/SS Oyster Perpetual Datejust (Ref#16233) Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono (Ref#2920.80.91) |
1 April 2008, 07:12 AM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,785
|
Hard choice. I pick both also.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.