ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 August 2014, 07:23 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Home!!
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 267
|
Vintage rolex hand corrosion - decrease value or no?
Hello,
I am looking at a 5513 from 1982 and i notice some corrosion on the hands, dont know why this bothers me. Maybe because its creating spotting on the tritium lume. Instead of sticking to just the steel. Is this something that i should avoid or is it just a part of buying vintage rolex? What is considered a normal amount of corrosion when it comes to the hands? Thanks! |
14 August 2014, 07:31 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Is this something that i should avoid or is it just a part of buying vintage rolex?
What is considered a normal amount of corrosion when it comes to the hands? 1. yes 2. huh? normal amount? 0.0001g Seriously, it's pretty common, and if not too bad (according to personal scale of acceptability), don't worry about it. |
14 August 2014, 07:35 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Home!!
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 267
|
Thats what i figured,
Now What if the corrosion is carrying through to the tritium on the hands and creating discoloration. To the point it is different from the color of the dial markers? (Starting to anyways) |
14 August 2014, 08:02 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, Oregon
Watch: 1009 zephyr
Posts: 147
|
This is an interesting discussion to me also, with a sweep hand on a 1009 watch that is in for 'full service' I requested the watch shop see if there was anything that could be done to 'clean' or remove the discoloration, and, if not to just leave it. If they can clean this they will be big heroes to me. I don't like looking at it on a watch which is otherwise nearly perfect.
|
14 August 2014, 08:56 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Home!!
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 267
|
The watch is from the 80s is it true that rolex were using inferior materials during that time frame to cut costs?
As it was during the "quartz crises" Ive heard this but i hardly believe such a company would do so, Not sure if that is to blame |
14 August 2014, 10:41 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: John Baker III
Location: Spring,Texas
Watch: 1971 Red Sub
Posts: 2,222
|
If a Submariner was made prior to 1964, then the corrosion could be secondary to the radium paint they used....
If it is a 1980's watch, I would be more concerned about a moisture issue as the cause.... You might want a watchmaker to open up the case back and take a close look at the movement to make sure that moisture didn't get in there too...
__________________
As I've grown older, I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing off everyone is a piece of cake. |
14 August 2014, 10:57 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Home!!
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 267
|
Okay will do!
But seeing as there is no moisture issues a small amount is normal? Ive seen a lot of examples with corrosion |
14 August 2014, 12:50 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cen-Cal
Watch: 16610
Posts: 869
|
Corrosion is livable....however any cracks in the Tritium, goodbye lume....hello sourcing period correct hands!
Of one wears said specimen, that is. |
14 August 2014, 12:57 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Home!!
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 267
|
True ,
Cracked hands or this going to last? Photo credit : Kirilyuzh |
14 August 2014, 04:37 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
^^ If that's the watch in question, the hands look fine to me, and I doubt Rolex used 'inferior materials' in the 80s. Things age, and this is what the appeal is, to most vintage enthusiasts. If it bothers you, then maybe vintage is not the route, because it's not going to get better, and trying to 'clean' it would spell disaster, IMHO...
|
14 August 2014, 04:45 PM | #11 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
|
14 August 2014, 05:50 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Looks ok I would not worry
__________________
watches many |
14 August 2014, 06:26 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: peb
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 3,145
|
Here is another example, same period maxi5 to compare the example you shared. You can see the second hand with corrosion. I don't think it is a problem at all. I have similiar damage on my 1680 as well. I would worry more about the matching patina on the markers and hands than the corrosion, which looks perfect at the maxi5 you shared
Photo Credit:Vınontre |
14 August 2014, 10:46 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Home!!
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 267
|
Great! Wanted to be sure before i take the dive.
It does seem like its part of the package. Just as long as the lume isn't cracking off. The second hand is a bit more corroded in the other pics of the watch but the lum is in the same condition Great help guys! |
15 August 2014, 05:26 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Home!!
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 267
|
And last thing! The tritium on the hands, its turning a dark brown in spots around the edges. Is that from the corrosion causing the patina to change color?
Or just the natural ageing of the patina? |
15 August 2014, 06:12 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Thomas
Location: london
Watch: 5512, 6263, 6265
Posts: 104
|
Hands of this period are prone to corrosion and it can be seen on lots of watches of this era, so nothing out of the normal.
Does it decrease value, not really unless it is really bad and you can always find another set. |
15 August 2014, 06:17 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Home!!
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 267
|
True,
I guess i should have clarified this in the beggining. The corrosion of the metal doesnt bother me so much, but the spotting on the tritium does. Think that will spread over time as the corrosion continues ? Changing the color of the hands or no. Thanks! |
15 August 2014, 06:19 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
|
Does anyone know if a good watchmaker can "clean" the corrosion off of hands (whether it be a 1980's sub like the OP or a 1963 gilt sub)?
__________________
V/R Mike |
15 August 2014, 07:01 AM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
No cleaning. The older vintage hands are very, very fragile. Look at it wrong and it could come off, let alone touching it. I've seen tritium fall off hands after removing them from a watch!
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.