The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 April 2008, 09:42 PM   #1
harvey
"TRF" Member
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: rolexforums.com
Posts: 5,437
Icon20 CHOOSING A ROLEX MODEL: matter of aesthetics alone OR age and affordability?

just sitting here wondering whether members of this forum in a particular age group tend to buy specific models/types.

i could be generalising but i feel the older members of the forum do tend to lean towards materials other than say ss, opting for tt or gold etc; and having fussier dial options etc.

is this the case of aesthetics alone or simply that they can afford the more expensive options, your thoughts please...


harvey

ps im new to the forum, so apologies if this has been discussed before.
harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2008, 09:51 PM   #2
Scarface
"TRF" Member
 
Scarface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey.eu View Post
just sitting here wondering whether members of this forum in a particular age group tend to buy specific models/types.

i could be generalising but i feel the older members of the forum do tend to lean towards materials other than say ss, opting for tt or gold etc; and having fussier dial options etc.

is this the case of aesthetics alone or simply that they can afford the more expensive options, your thoughts please...


harvey

ps im new to the forum, so apologies if this has been discussed before.

Harvey,

Very roughly if we can generalize younger people do not use gold that much and prefer steel - but there are exceptions. For example, I am young and I do have a bi-metal cronograph. However my second watch is SS - only the bezel is white gold. Now I want to get a SS alone.

In addition, I think we should not mix aesthetics per se (and bling maybe) with gold vs steel; aesthetically great watches do exist in YellGold and WhGold as well as in SS; the opposite holds true as well, I 've seen ugly watches in SS alone.
__________________
Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master ll
Rolex
Oyster Perpetual Datejust
Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph
Scarface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2008, 09:58 PM   #3
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
Personally im 24 and feel much more comfortable with SS. Just Bought the Milgauss and its perfect. I think Yellow gold is definitely for older men ( well over 35). Im Sure the price also has significance on this too but i think it is more the aesthetics as you say. I would wear white gold because of the colour but the price is rather high. So basically i agree with both your statements and am now confused!

Toph
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2008, 11:10 PM   #4
daytona lad
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 30
I'm late 30's and have both the SS and YG, i didn't choose the WG as it looks very similar to ss.
with ss the main thing is it is more scratch resistant, my yg gets scratches from just wiping the bezel.
daytona lad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2008, 11:18 PM   #5
problmchylde
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: PETER
Location: Singapore
Watch: 1665 SD
Posts: 768
I'm nearing 40.....and All my watches are SS.Although I am considering a full gold DD 1803.Hmmm.....maybe your theory holds water......
problmchylde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2008, 11:22 PM   #6
llamaofdoom
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 417
I'm 38, and for personal wear, I stick with stainless steel sport watches. I have had, and have currently, yellow gold models - but I don't wear them much.

Generally speaking, I see the all gold models on older guys - 50-60 years old.
llamaofdoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2008, 11:30 PM   #7
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey.eu View Post
just sitting here wondering whether members of this forum in a particular age group tend to buy specific models/types.

i could be generalising but i feel the older members of the forum do tend to lean towards materials other than say ss, opting for tt or gold etc; and having fussier dial options etc.

is this the case of aesthetics alone or simply that they can afford the more expensive options, your thoughts please...


harvey

ps im new to the forum, so apologies if this has been discussed before.
Well speaking for myself and like you say a older TRF member, and perhaps now a lot wiser. I just like my watches plain and simple and in good old S.Steel.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2008, 11:35 PM   #8
timackerman
"TRF" Member
 
timackerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Tim
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,117
I am 22, and by far prefer the SS look
__________________
Daytona 116520
timackerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 12:00 AM   #9
Overkill
"TRF" Member
 
Overkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Youssef
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Watch: Milgauss Z-Blue
Posts: 925
I'm 21 and I have a 16610 Sub Date (SS), my dream watch right now is the GMT-II C in SS.

I'm generally not too fond of the two tone look. My preference in terms of looks is either SS or full gold (yellow or red), but I like SS more at this point. I definitely don't see myself wearing any gold watch, at least not before I hit late 30's or 40's.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 116700
Rolex Explorer 214270
Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue
IWC Portuguese Hand Wound IW5454-08
Panerai Radiomir PAM183
Overkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 12:05 AM   #10
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
I am 19 and i am starting to like TT watches Now that's bad

But i generally prefer SS
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 12:06 AM   #11
DS/B MINI S
"TRF" Member
 
DS/B MINI S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Charlotte NC
Watch: SD & Exp II
Posts: 961
Just call me middle-aged and crazy, but I prefer SS watches. I wouldn't mind having a gold dress watch, but since I don't wear a suit very often it's not high on my priority list. Two tone watches are not my thing, but my WIFE does have a few
__________________
16600 Sea-Dweller
16570 Explorer II (White Dial)
DS/B MINI S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 12:07 AM   #12
Norm
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 414
I'm 50 and like to think with two teenage kids I appreciate new styles but I grew up with the 2 tone look so this still appeals to me. But most of my watches are indeed SS and Titanium.
Norm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 12:19 AM   #13
TempoKing
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
I need to buy a 1 ton Truck, I guess Ford 350..?
TempoKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 12:42 AM   #14
cocopeep
"TRF" Member
 
cocopeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PA
Watch: DJ 116234
Posts: 510
Im 38 and although I like the look of either all gold or all SS, I prefer the steel look because

1. the cost of the watch is cheaper than gold
2. Im afraid if I wore an all gold watch I may get mugged
3. My DJ can go with a suit, or with everyday wear
4. Harder to scratch up than gold
cocopeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 01:21 AM   #15
chunala
"TRF" Member
 
chunala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Alan
Location: NYC
Watch: TT TOG (Everose)
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by frostie View Post
I am 19 and i am starting to like TT watches Now that's bad

frostie: nothing wrong with that
chunala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 01:24 AM   #16
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunala View Post
frostie: nothing wrong with that
Yeah i know that it's not bad to like TT watches but rolex is a bit harmful for your pocket too

__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 01:48 AM   #17
veefour
"TRF" Member
 
veefour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 520
I (56) prefer SS, specially on "tool" watches. At least we should pretend we use them as tools
veefour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 02:00 AM   #18
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
I have bought based on functionality.

Owing to my lifestyle and my work, maybe a Datejust wouldn't be the right choice.

Also my ageing eyes prefer a slightly larger diameter.

My choices get made based on my needs, no on my age or any perception of what I think is appropriate to my age.

C
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 03:02 AM   #19
f16570
"TRF" Member
 
f16570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
Very difficult to categorise, but heres my take.
SS is a little more relaxed looking and a whole lot more durable.
Never been keen on the TT thing, but that is purely personal.
The Gold thing for me says "arrived" "distinguished" "mature".
If I had to have a "dress" watch them the Rolex Prince for me.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best.
f
f16570 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 05:22 AM   #20
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
I'm 61 and enjoy a dash of subtle bling.

I love my Platty 'cause it does have a precious metal (Pt) dial and bezel. I also love TT models as well as full gold models. Can't afford the latter, unfortunately.....but my next dream watch could well possibly be this one!!

__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2008, 05:25 AM   #21
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
I'm 35 and appreciate SS, TT and yellow or rose gold. But 10 years ago, I would have bought a 16610 instead of Bluesy.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.