ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

seokpyo · 14 November 2014, 10:15 PM

several days ago, i ask about daytona dial....

and today, i got this dial from seller

and this daytona dial is real?? or fake??

before feedback to seller,i ask to you about that

plz reply for me..

thx

MonBK · 14 November 2014, 10:26 PM

I'm going against what everyone else said in your other two repetitive threads and say it looks good.

Watchcollectables · 15 November 2014, 03:26 AM

That one is real !

rolex_DateJust · 15 November 2014, 06:08 AM

This one looks good compared to the other thread. In your other thread things looked a bit off

bayerische · 15 November 2014, 07:54 AM

Sure it's the same dial???

The word "DAYTONA" was leaking well into the center seconds dial on your old pics...

Welshwatchman · 15 November 2014, 07:57 AM

The pic above is of a genuine Daytona dial, I think.

Not the case with your other thread.

crowncollection · 15 November 2014, 08:12 AM

looks good

BOA · 15 November 2014, 08:14 AM

You also changed the picture in the original thread.

MonBK · 15 November 2014, 08:24 AM

Here you go guys, I put them both together so you can compare.

rolex_DateJust · 15 November 2014, 08:52 AM

The 6 o'clock marker on the "before thread picture" looks sloppy compared to the one on the new dial on the right. Maybe it's the angle but at least to me that's what I looks like. Also, "Daytona" on the left picture is definitely intercepting with the sub dial compared to that one on the right

goldfixer21 · 15 November 2014, 09:13 AM

It appears to me to be the same dial, but the first pic has been edited by Snapseed or some other photo editing process to sharpen it.

jvmartin · 15 November 2014, 10:25 AM

This dial looks good and you definitely got a good deal for it!

AbsolutelyROLEX! · 15 November 2014, 02:16 PM

Dial looks good to me too, one on the left very bad

Fredrik · 15 November 2014, 05:44 PM

The one on the left has misaligned numbers and hash marks in the subdials. This is especially clear if you look at the hash marks in the 3 o'clock subdial.

MonBK · 16 November 2014, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anderl712000

Dial looks good to me too, one on the left very bad

In what way is it very bad?

14 November 2014, 10:15 PM	#1
seokpyo "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: south korea Posts: 7	fake or real?? several days ago, i ask about daytona dial.... and today, i got this dial from seller and this daytona dial is real?? or fake?? before feedback to seller,i ask to you about that plz reply for me.. thx Attached Images

15 November 2014, 07:54 AM	#5
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Sure it's the same dial??? The word "DAYTONA" was leaking well into the center seconds dial on your old pics... __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

15 November 2014, 07:57 AM	#6
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	The pic above is of a genuine Daytona dial, I think. Not the case with your other thread. __________________ ..33

15 November 2014, 08:12 AM	#7
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	looks good __________________ watches many

15 November 2014, 08:24 AM	#9
MonBK Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Kingstown Posts: 58,279	Here you go guys, I put them both together so you can compare. Attached Images

14 November 2014, 10:26 PM	#2
MonBK Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Kingstown Posts: 58,279	I'm going against what everyone else said in your other two repetitive threads and say it looks good.

15 November 2014, 03:26 AM	#3
Watchcollectables "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: UK Posts: 320	That one is real !

15 November 2014, 06:08 AM	#4
rolex_DateJust 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Sergio Location: Miami, FL Watch: Yes please! Posts: 1,781	This one looks good compared to the other thread. In your other thread things looked a bit off

15 November 2014, 08:14 AM	#8
BOA "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Bruce Location: Chicago, IL Watch: Meteorite DD Posts: 2,412	You also changed the picture in the original thread.

15 November 2014, 08:52 AM	#10
rolex_DateJust 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Sergio Location: Miami, FL Watch: Yes please! Posts: 1,781	The 6 o'clock marker on the "before thread picture" looks sloppy compared to the one on the new dial on the right. Maybe it's the angle but at least to me that's what I looks like. Also, "Daytona" on the left picture is definitely intercepting with the sub dial compared to that one on the right

15 November 2014, 09:13 AM	#11
goldfixer21 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Florida Posts: 807	It appears to me to be the same dial, but the first pic has been edited by Snapseed or some other photo editing process to sharpen it.

15 November 2014, 10:25 AM	#12
jvmartin "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 2,349	This dial looks good and you definitely got a good deal for it!

15 November 2014, 02:16 PM	#13
AbsolutelyROLEX! "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: AKA: ANDERL712000 Posts: 4,935	Dial looks good to me too, one on the left very bad __________________ We want to be the first in the field and Rolex should be seen as the one and only-the best. Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex founder

15 November 2014, 05:44 PM	#14
Fredrik 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Sweden Watch: 1680 Posts: 1,874	The one on the left has misaligned numbers and hash marks in the subdials. This is especially clear if you look at the hash marks in the 3 o'clock subdial.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)