The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 January 2015, 10:10 AM   #1
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Another 16570 vs 216570 thread..

Which suits my wrist better? I prefer the 40mm but I love the bracelet of 42mm, what do I do?

Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 10:12 AM   #2
CDNWatchNut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
I would say the 40 is a better fit, but what looks good in your eyes is the right fit for you.
CDNWatchNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 12:51 PM   #3
maxbaris
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Baris
Location: Toronto
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDNWatchNut View Post
I would say the 40 is a better fit, but what looks good in your eyes is the right fit for you.

Have to agree with my fellow Canadian friend here!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
maxbaris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 12:57 PM   #4
mailman
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
42
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 10:13 AM   #5
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
seems like you know the answer.
looks like 40mm is your size from the pics.
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 12:58 PM   #6
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
seems like you know the answer.
looks like 40mm is your size from the pics.
Agree
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 12:25 PM   #7
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
^^ Yes 40mm size is better but the bracelet is not. Hence the confusion.. :(
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 08:52 PM   #8
BlackBay1
"TRF" Member
 
BlackBay1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxy View Post
^^ Yes 40mm size is better but the bracelet is not. Hence the confusion.. :(
40 does suit you better, but if you are not happy with the bracelet you probably won't be happy with the watch in the long term. I suppose you could put it on a NATO or leather strap?
__________________

Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono
Black Bay Red
Submariner 114060
Daytona 116520
BlackBay1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 11:31 PM   #9
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxy View Post
^^ Yes 40mm size is better but the bracelet is not. Hence the confusion.. :(
This is why I had both, and none now.....

Gmt solves it
ap1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 12:32 PM   #10
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
The 16570 looks like it fits better on you.
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 01:22 PM   #11
floater156
"TRF" Member
 
floater156's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
Smaller watches look better in wrist shot pictures so hard to tell. I went with the 216570 because it fit my body frame and wrist better.
__________________
Lead by example through production.
floater156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 01:23 PM   #12
judson
"TRF" Member
 
judson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Watch: changes depending
Posts: 800
40mms looks better on you.
judson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 02:00 PM   #13
jolimont
"TRF" Member
 
jolimont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
216570 easy

The freccione ftw
jolimont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 02:04 PM   #14
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
42
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 02:29 PM   #15
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,513
I like bigger watches so the 42mm is what I would buy but the 40mm looks great and the older bracelet is well proven to handle anything the new bracelet will.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 07:35 PM   #16
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
I think it is a D-Series but I'll confirm it later. When is the D-series watches from?
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2015, 01:27 AM   #17
sportsmaven20
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
sportsmaven20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Randy
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxy View Post
I think it is a D-Series but I'll confirm it later. When is the D-series watches from?
Rolex started producing D serial watches in April 2005...I'm not sure when D serial production ended. The next serial (Z) began production in May 2006.

I hope this information is helpful.
sportsmaven20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2015, 03:09 AM   #18
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportsmaven20 View Post
Rolex started producing D serial watches in April 2005...I'm not sure when D serial production ended. The next serial (Z) began production in May 2006.

I hope this information is helpful.
Thanks a lot.
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 07:47 PM   #19
Nycturbovr6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
I prefer the 42mm over the older model
Nycturbovr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 07:55 PM   #20
Y1984
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Zurich
Posts: 14
40mm, I have both types of bracelets on my watches and I can tell you that the old bracelet is very comfortable and sturdy.
Had the same choice to make and I went with the 16570.
Y1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 08:23 PM   #21
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
You can't really tell from those pics and the watches don't look sized to your wrist.
From those pics I'd go with the watch I liked, and its the 42mm one.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:12 PM   #22
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
If you prefer the 40mm, I wouldn't change your mind just based on the bracelet.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:18 PM   #23
G-Web
2024 Pledge Member
 
G-Web's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Grant
Location: NZ
Watch: Moon
Posts: 1,719
You can never go wrong with the classic.
-GW
G-Web is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:19 PM   #24
Choo Yao Chuen
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 518
go for the 216570. It's just a matter of getting use to the new size.
Choo Yao Chuen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:37 PM   #25
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
People will pick their personal fave, which in my case is the 216570

I've also owned the 16570 and would not go back to the small size, old clasp, etc

Difficult to judge the fit from photos, especially with an unsized bracelet. Best to make your own judgement about this as (again) others will state their own preference.
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:41 PM   #26
toomuchtalk
"TRF" Member
 
toomuchtalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxy View Post
Which suits my wrist better? I prefer the 40mm but I love the bracelet of 42mm, what do I do?

Great photo of the two, so it's good too compare them...
The 40 mm looks better....still!
toomuchtalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2015, 01:31 AM   #27
actionkwj
"TRF" Member
 
actionkwj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego
Watch: me soak up the sun
Posts: 1,245
40mm looks better in proportion to your wrist
actionkwj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2015, 02:03 AM   #28
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
Just based on the pictures the 40mm looks better. I understand what you mean about the bracelet on the 216570. I had both models and definitely preferred the 216570's. IMO, unless you have at least a 7" wrist anything larger than 40mm looks too big. However, at the end of the day it's always your choice.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2015, 03:12 AM   #29
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annan View Post
Just based on the pictures the 40mm looks better. I understand what you mean about the bracelet on the 216570. I had both models and definitely preferred the 216570's. IMO, unless you have at least a 7" wrist anything larger than 40mm looks too big. However, at the end of the day it's always your choice.
My wrist is exactly 7 inches and 216570 looked lot bigger than the other 42mm watches in my collection.
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2015, 04:13 AM   #30
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxy View Post
My wrist is exactly 7 inches and 216570 looked lot bigger than the other 42mm watches in my collection.
The 216570 does indeed definitely wear/look bigger. After one year I flipped mine for a GMTII (40mm) simply because I could never get past the feeling that the EXP just looked too big for my 6.5" wrist.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.