ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 January 2015, 04:09 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 170
|
Running with a Rolex?
Sorry if this is a stupid question but would regular running whilst wearing a sub disrupt the movement and affect it's accuracy? Or can the parachrom hairspring handle it?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
20 January 2015, 04:20 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
|
As a passionate runner i just can t imagine a more uncomfortable thing than a wobbling heavy watch on my wrist however i did run in my subs a couple of times ,no worry it doesn t hurt the movement.
__________________
Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- *new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new * http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1 |
20 January 2015, 04:28 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
don't worry about the rolex they can handle it |
20 January 2015, 04:29 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
I have never run without my submariner on my wrist, that includes the traing and running of the nyc marathon ... NO PROBLEM... For the watch:)
20 years worth of beatings, the watch is at home in any environment your wrist is ok with.
__________________
|
20 January 2015, 04:30 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
I believe this is an honest question so I'd answer it the best way I can.
Yes you can but if your Rolex runs faster then you it's a good idea to regulate it. |
20 January 2015, 04:45 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
|
I agree with the above, it certainly should not do any harm to the watch.
I do suspect(just a guess) that it could have a very minor effect on the timekeeping for the duration of activity. |
20 January 2015, 05:01 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
|
Nope. No problem at all
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
20 January 2015, 05:04 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
|
20 January 2015, 05:06 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 170
|
Honest question and thanks for the honest answers...sorry for posing one of those "Is it safe" questions!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
20 January 2015, 05:09 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
I will be more worried about my legs and feets.
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
20 January 2015, 05:10 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
I miss the smileys.
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
20 January 2015, 05:20 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
No problem
__________________
watches many |
20 January 2015, 05:31 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
While you could, I wouldn't.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
20 January 2015, 05:54 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 19
|
|
20 January 2015, 05:56 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Should be fine
__________________
|
20 January 2015, 06:08 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
|
20 January 2015, 06:22 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 479
|
Sigh.....
|
20 January 2015, 06:30 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: Frisco, Tx
Watch: Daytona/BLRO/SkyD
Posts: 471
|
Run with a Garmin, and then put the sub on for lunch!
|
20 January 2015, 06:36 AM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Matt
Location: Tampa, FL
Watch: Hulk/SD4K/SeaQ/P39
Posts: 3,203
|
Agreed. It's advantageous to run with a chrono or gps function and have it be light. Garmin is the best option. Rolex for after you have showered.
__________________
Why is it, "A penny for your thoughts," but, "you have to put your two cents in?" Somebody's making a penny. |
20 January 2015, 06:40 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Watch: RG Olive DD40
Posts: 1,795
|
Have an order in for a Fitbit, but my father in law swears by his Garmin. Wouldn't dream of wearing a Rolex while running, can't imagine it's comfortable.
|
20 January 2015, 06:42 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: Frisco, Tx
Watch: Daytona/BLRO/SkyD
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
|
|
20 January 2015, 06:46 AM | #22 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
It must oscillate at a certain frequency to be accurate, temperature and movement will always affect that frequency. So, the increased forces that you feel on your wrist and arms will translate to your watch affecting the frequency (rotation) of the balance - it will likely run faster.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
20 January 2015, 07:56 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 170
|
Tools....cheers for a sensible and knowledgeable reply...that's what I was after.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
20 January 2015, 08:09 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Douglas
Location: HSV / ANC
Watch: 126660
Posts: 626
|
Bracing myself for:
"Oh yeah, and when the OP is done running, is it okay if he showers with his Sub?" |
20 January 2015, 08:14 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,693
|
you are good to go....dont even think about it.
|
20 January 2015, 08:57 AM | #26 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
Quote:
Turns out you can walk with it on and even take a shower with it on! Who would have thought a $8k watch could stand the abuse of footsteps quickly?!?! |
|
20 January 2015, 10:06 AM | #27 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: home
Watch: 214270
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
I am genuinely curious about this, not being a watchmaker. I thought there must be a regulator in there that dampens high frequency oscillations, given that most wrist rotations are higher than the 4Hz at which an automatic is rated. Paradoxically, it's biomechnanically extremely difficult and taxing, if not impossible, for our arms to go >4Hz while running. The impact shock from the foot is also low in frequency (<4Hz). The "higher" frequency component is the surface wave propagating upwards from the impact zone, but should be sufficiently dampened along the way. Anything higher in frequency and stronger and your skin corpuscles will feel them... Does the watch spring take the kinetic energy in all directions? or is there a plane of motion that it's most efficient in? [Edit: oops I should clarify that the arms can move faster, just usually not during running] |
|
20 January 2015, 10:06 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
As a runner, I can't imagine wanting to run with any watch other than one intended for running (like GPS sport watch). Just my personal preference though.
|
20 January 2015, 10:20 AM | #29 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
. The balance oscillates in one plane and is most efficient static - it is affected by basic gravity and, depending on how you lay the watch at rest, the timing will be affected. Motion opposite either leg of oscillation will hinder the balance from making a complete swing to a greater affect than basic gravity would - therefore walking, or running will affect that oscillation to some degree. It is generally accepted that a watch will almost always run faster when worn than it does at rest or even on a winder; therefore, a greater degree of activity, such as running, will likely have a greater affect on the balance and it will run even faster.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
20 January 2015, 10:29 AM | #30 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: home
Watch: 214270
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.