ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

DAN.K · 2 May 2008, 08:18 AM

Ive just posted pics of my 1972 GMT 1675...but it came with a folded Jubilee bracelet...
I just purchased a folded oyster 7836 bracelet...will this be period correct for my watch?

It came with 380 end links?Will those work?

Thanks!!!

veefour · 2 May 2008, 09:10 AM

If Mike doesn't answer you first, try a search, as there was a thread about it a few days ago.

Beef · 2 May 2008, 09:30 AM

Yes, I believe it is correct. The folded bracelets lasted into the mid-1970's. I don't know about the end links. Best way to check is put them on, see if it looks right. I've swapped my bracelets around (temporarily) over the years. Not all fit and not all that did looked right. Mike can can give you the definitive details. Somewhere on this forum I saw a chart with models, dates, bracelet #, but it's been a while.

springer · 2 May 2008, 10:00 AM

Yes, it is correct for the watch.

SPACE-DWELLER · 2 May 2008, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beef

(...). Somewhere on this forum I saw a chart with models, dates, bracelet #, but it's been a while.

It might have been this chart:

mike · 2 May 2008, 08:02 PM

Dan, yes on the bracelet. 380s are more for an early 1680. 280s would be better for the 1675.

DAN.K · 2 May 2008, 10:03 PM

Hey,MIke,thanks!!!

and,BO,thanks a lot for that chart,exactly what I needed!!!!

etp095 · 2 May 2008, 10:12 PM

hey bo what book do you get these charts from?

2 May 2008, 08:18 AM	#1
DAN.K Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Daniel Location: Brazil Posts: 114	Question for the GMT gurus... Ive just posted pics of my 1972 GMT 1675...but it came with a folded Jubilee bracelet... I just purchased a folded oyster 7836 bracelet...will this be period correct for my watch? It came with 380 end links?Will those work? Thanks!!!

2 May 2008, 09:10 AM	#2
veefour "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Canary Islands Posts: 520	If Mike doesn't answer you first, try a search, as there was a thread about it a few days ago. __________________ 16800 Matt (1986) Avatar pic by Jocke

2 May 2008, 09:30 AM	#3
Beef "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: USA Posts: 1,824	Yes, I believe it is correct. The folded bracelets lasted into the mid-1970's. I don't know about the end links. Best way to check is put them on, see if it looks right. I've swapped my bracelets around (temporarily) over the years. Not all fit and not all that did looked right. Mike can can give you the definitive details. Somewhere on this forum I saw a chart with models, dates, bracelet #, but it's been a while. __________________ "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." "So you have enemies. Good. You must have stood up for something, sometime in your life." Winston Churchill

2 May 2008, 10:12 PM	#8
etp095 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: rudolph Location: chicago burbs Posts: 2,026	hey bo what book do you get these charts from? __________________ tt date circa 69' 5513 circa 81' ss sub w/date (z) pepsi gmt for dad(D) polar expy II(z) 1675 gmt circa 68' ladies datejust on jubilee for mom (z) sea dweller16600(M) SS Sub-C(g) Omega Planet Ocean,45.5 on mesh(2500D)

2 May 2008, 10:00 AM	#4
springer 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,319	Yes, it is correct for the watch.

2 May 2008, 08:02 PM	#6
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Dan, yes on the bracelet. 380s are more for an early 1680. 280s would be better for the 1675.

2 May 2008, 10:03 PM	#7
DAN.K Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Daniel Location: Brazil Posts: 114	Hey,MIke,thanks!!! and,BO,thanks a lot for that chart,exactly what I needed!!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)