ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2015, 09:40 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Logan
Location: USA
Posts: 2,483
|
Pepsi vs IWC perpetual
Hi folks
Totally different animals but for the same money, what would be your choice? I know that one is sport the other dress.... so that out of the way what would you factor in, in order to make a decision? |
17 March 2015, 09:42 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,284
|
pepsi all day long
|
17 March 2015, 09:45 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,284
|
I was litterally just looking at watch finder - started my search with i want a new watch but i want something different now (not a rolex)
2hrs later i find my self looking at rolex.. they are so versatile ... im sticking with rolex |
17 March 2015, 09:46 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
GMTc.
|
17 March 2015, 09:47 AM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,312
|
Gmt
|
17 March 2015, 09:50 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
|
I want the Rolex.
|
17 March 2015, 09:51 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: US
Posts: 410
|
That cyclops magnification is really off.
|
17 March 2015, 09:53 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ken
Location: GMT -5
Watch: 16610
Posts: 1,842
|
I'd have to go with the Pepsi as well. That being said, IMO, these are two drastically different watches both in form and function. Kind of like comparing a Rolls Royce to a Ferrari. The only reason I'm going with the Pepsi is because: a) this is a Rolex forum and b) my next new Rolex will probably be a GMT.
The IWC is an incredible looking timepiece though! |
17 March 2015, 09:55 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ken
Location: GMT -5
Watch: 16610
Posts: 1,842
|
|
17 March 2015, 09:57 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,120
|
|
17 March 2015, 09:58 AM | #11 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
|
I had that IWC years ago and it is truly a beautiful watch! So different and hard to compare. Sheer beauty and overall watch clearly the IWC. Ultimate casual sports watch clearly the GMT. Totally subjective and will depend on your need and use as well as current collection. You should post in Non Rolex section to get a more objective opinion unless you already made up your mind.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
17 March 2015, 10:02 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
For that kind of money, you can take a loupe to the IWC to admire the level of quality fit and finish. .
The rolex you can just glance at it see a lack of quality control. Disappointing at that price point. That being said, IWC all day long. |
17 March 2015, 10:07 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 237
|
Pepsi all the way. Although some may find the WG too heavy, I love the weight. I picked up a IWC Portugieser automatic once at an AD and can't believe how light the watch is. Is about as light as my 36mm Datejust, but the watch is nearly twice the size.
|
17 March 2015, 10:09 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
|
IWC and later buy a batman
|
17 March 2015, 10:10 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
IWC. One of the best looking perpetuals out there. I prefer the older pepsi.
The decision should be based on what you do and what you plan to wear the watch with. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most' |
17 March 2015, 10:11 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
|
I love the GMT Master II but if you're going to spend that sort of money, I think it warrants a dress watch. Unless you already have an insane collection, the IWC better suits the price tag. I know this opinion is likely unpopular here, and while I love everything Rolex does, I think if you're going to spend 20k+ on a watch it should be a dressier piece.
Nothing wrong with a precious metal sport watch, but I'd need a more rounded collection before I invested in one. |
17 March 2015, 10:11 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
I would go for the IWC in this case
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
17 March 2015, 10:14 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Chi-town
Watch: Starbucks, Panerai
Posts: 1,188
|
I'd do the IWC too. A beautiful piece.
__________________
Starbucks, Speedmaster Professional, PAM 212 |
17 March 2015, 10:18 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: toronto
Posts: 239
|
iwc! other than the metal, the level of finishing between a stainless rolex and a pm rolex is the same, which is unloupable :P
|
17 March 2015, 10:19 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Roberto
Location: Jupiter / Cozumel
Watch: Sub Bluesy
Posts: 1,407
|
IWC such an amazing watch!
__________________
Do good. And good will come to you |
17 March 2015, 10:20 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Tim
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,428
|
If you want a sports watch I would go Pepsi. If you want a dress watch (that size) I would look at the jlc duometer
|
17 March 2015, 10:20 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
I think it's one of those situations where you close your eyes and say, which one do I see myself wearing and how does it fit into my lifestyle?
For me, I dress very casually on a daily basis and really love the sport watches on bracelet, so the Rolex appeals to me. The IWC is such a gorgeous watch, though. What about you? |
17 March 2015, 10:28 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
I personally am not a fan of IWC for the choice is easy....
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
17 March 2015, 10:29 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16713 & 116610LV
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
Though, I would not buy that particular Rolex. I'd buy a stainless one and maybe some other, cleaner? dress watch. Though, the IWC is a masterpiece. It truly is. Stunningly beautiful. It's just that it does not fit my life style. |
|
17 March 2015, 10:48 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Virginia
Watch: Subs, SD4K
Posts: 2,272
|
Factors weighing in? Rolex vs non-Rolex. Sport and dress vs dress alone. Versatility vs limited application. Durability vs fragility. My recommendation?? GMT!
__________________
Subaholics Anonymous |
17 March 2015, 10:52 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,884
|
Iwc
|
17 March 2015, 10:54 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Pepsi for me
|
17 March 2015, 10:55 AM | #28 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
|
No offense but that IWC is anything but a dress watch. It is a big chunky watch and 44mm! It also is anything but fragile. Is it as durable as durable as a Rolex? No but that doesn't make it fragile. I get you prefer Rolex and that is ok but neither is a dress watch one is just dressier.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
17 March 2015, 10:59 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Aaron
Location: St. Louis, MO
Watch: Ref. 214270
Posts: 325
|
Perpetual calender with a digital year reading, yeah I would choose the complicated watch. Rolex sells the same complication in a Steel GMT for a lot less.
|
17 March 2015, 10:59 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Baris
Location: Toronto
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 477
|
I will go with the IWC because I just watched an episode of House of Cards! If FU wears IWC, there must be a good reason! Lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.