ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SabaDen · 16 May 2008, 05:16 PM

Decision making time

... which will you go for if you have the choice for ONLY 1?

Though I love both and if I go for 1 of it, it'll be my 5th watch (3 PAMs & 1 AP RO

) in 3mths

So to get both together will kill my budget for other projects

.

So which one of these 2 ...

1) Rolex GMT Master II - 16710 "D" series with the 3185 movement in Black/Red (Coke) bezel

2) Rolex GMT Master II-C - 116710 "Z" series with, of course, the 3186 movement

shedlock2000 · 16 May 2008, 05:26 PM

Now, i have recently touched on this in another couple of posts. Go for the classic man. I like the GMT IIc i have now, but was it the right move......prob not. Go for the sleek timless GMT II bro. personally, and this is only me, but i would go black bezel instead of coke, but its a personal thing.

I found my GMT II c shows up the scratches, is a little clumbersome to wear for working in, but the quick link is a boon to the weary traveler! The clasp is a huge improvement, but too bulky. The dial is clearer to those who wear glasses like me and who cant see in the dark, and the bezel is practically indestructable (but the platinum easily marks)

Got to be the GMt II my friend..... but as is always said, what sings to you , is the right choice!

BiG JeEzY · 16 May 2008, 05:31 PM

Hmmm, thats actually a difficult choice now that I think of it. I say that it would be the GMT II (non ceramic) by a very narrow margin though I would really wish that there was an option to have both.

However my opinion is just mines, my advice is to go with the watch that smiles at you the most. Just lay them side by side, I think that is when you can make a decision on which one you really want to go with.

Magik · 16 May 2008, 06:03 PM

I prefer the older GMT ll over the ceramic version. I don't really care how the case blends into the bracelet on the ceramic version. My vote would be for the "Coke."

Baptistman · 16 May 2008, 06:10 PM

Well imo having tried both on, I prefer the classic 16710. I found it more comfortable, plus I just feel the new GMT as nice looking as it is, is to fussy for an every day tool watch. The 16710 is a Rolex Classic.

imo the new GMT would of benefited from an all satin braclelet for real tool watch appeal

Any excuse to post a photo

SPACE-DWELLER · 16 May 2008, 06:20 PM

I've owned an SS GMT IIc. Although I initially liked the watch, I would have no doubt what to choose if I wore to opt between the new and old GMT II.

I'd definately go for the OLD GMT II !

^fai^ · 16 May 2008, 07:19 PM

I would think of the old GMT II looks more classic

I will vote for old GMT II

dopeymuppet · 16 May 2008, 07:35 PM

I tried a GMTIIc on at the AD the other day and I thought that it was awesome quite frankly. So clean and the ceramic bezel looks incredible!

PhilM · 16 May 2008, 07:39 PM

GMT II for me also

shoppy · 16 May 2008, 07:54 PM

GMT IIc, had both and sold the old GMT II.

danberger · 16 May 2008, 08:02 PM

I have just received a package in the last half hour that has in it.......my new GMTIIc - have to say its the only Rolex that has ever blown me away.... which in my mind indicates that if you like the more modern look this is the one to go for. The older models look far to retro for me. The green hand is fab !

Scarface · 16 May 2008, 08:39 PM

Get the Coke

cmcm3 · 16 May 2008, 09:02 PM

I would go with the older model. They are tougher to get, and the GMTIIC isnt going anywhere for quite a while, so if you change your mind in future it will be easy to get hold of one.

stnmikita · 16 May 2008, 09:14 PM

A am going through a similar debate and posted a few days ago asking if there was an issue with the GMT-IIc due to the (seemingly) large number of people who bought the ceramic and later got rid of it. This thread has provided more information on why folks chose to sell their ceramic or get rid of it for another watch.

I still lean toward the ceramic, but with a brushed bracelet. Check out this link:

http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...82#msg_3696117

If I go IIc, I'll be doing the same.

goldenlace · 16 May 2008, 09:37 PM

HI, i would go for the gmt II classic but much depends on what you like more. take a look at the AD and choose what you like more 8)

HDHNTER · 16 May 2008, 09:39 PM

I would go with the Coke.

Texsubmariner · 16 May 2008, 10:32 PM

That's a tough choice to make. I generally like the ceramic bezel and the updated solid links and clasp of the 116710. I could pass on the maxi dial and polished center links. Overall, I like the ceramic version in that it looks great with shorts or tux. I vote for the ceramic by a close margin.

Dan Pierce · 16 May 2008, 11:02 PM

Best way is to try both on and that should tell you what's best. But if you're asking me the classic 16710 GMT "Coke" is the way to go.

Good luck,
dP

vjb.knife · 17 May 2008, 12:41 AM

Both are great choices but I Like the new model more, because of the crown, parachrom spring and the bracelet.

Tools · 17 May 2008, 12:42 AM

That classic black/red GMT will become harder to find over time..

Trurolexer · 17 May 2008, 12:55 AM

Option number 2. Why you not try a Pepsi?

GMTII Owner · 17 May 2008, 01:18 AM

IIc

S/SOnly · 17 May 2008, 01:20 AM

16710 Black/Burgundy is a fav.... It smiles at me daily.

Randy · 17 May 2008, 01:24 AM

GMT llc, New design, New bracelet, watch is a stunner in person!!

ZROLEX · 17 May 2008, 03:10 AM

GMT IIC!!!!!!!!
Love the watch every day more and more!!!!!!! You will love it too!!!!!

zak98 · 17 May 2008, 03:32 AM

just picked up a gmt 2 pepsi last night. m serial number. tried on the gmt2c, LV, milgauss, and explorer 2... but the pepsi spoke to me once i actually tried it on.

not sure if it does have the 3186, but it does have the "stick" gmt 2 vs. the roman numerals, seemed to pass the wiggle test. but either way.. i am very happy with it.

nje39 · 17 May 2008, 03:47 AM

coke all the way..................or coke zero

petah · 17 May 2008, 04:25 AM

GMT II, the polished bracelet on the IIc really ruined the watch IMO.

Hamilton Carvalho · 17 May 2008, 04:33 AM

Not an easy one. I would take the 16710 due to the fact that it is no longer in production. But, the 116710 would certainly be my next whenever I could afford it.

Magik · 17 May 2008, 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zak98

just picked up a gmt 2 pepsi last night. m serial number. tried on the gmt2c, LV, milgauss, and explorer 2... but the pepsi spoke to me once i actually tried it on.

not sure if it does have the 3186, but it does have the "stick" gmt 2 vs. the roman numerals, seemed to pass the wiggle test. but either way.. i am very happy with it.

Congratulations

. I have the exact same watch you do. I hope you enjoy it. I love mine.

16 May 2008, 05:16 PM	#1
SabaDen Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Dennis Location: Far East Watch: Daytona ... PAM190 Posts: 192	GMTII-C or GMTII Coke? Decision making time ... which will you go for if you have the choice for ONLY 1? Though I love both and if I go for 1 of it, it'll be my 5th watch (3 PAMs & 1 AP RO ) in 3mths So to get both together will kill my budget for other projects . So which one of these 2 ... 1) Rolex GMT Master II - 16710 "D" series with the 3185 movement in Black/Red (Coke) bezel 2) Rolex GMT Master II-C - 116710 "Z" series with, of course, the 3186 movement

16 May 2008, 05:26 PM	#2
shedlock2000 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Steve Location: Canada Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia Posts: 1,770	Now, i have recently touched on this in another couple of posts. Go for the classic man. I like the GMT IIc i have now, but was it the right move......prob not. Go for the sleek timless GMT II bro. personally, and this is only me, but i would go black bezel instead of coke, but its a personal thing. I found my GMT II c shows up the scratches, is a little clumbersome to wear for working in, but the quick link is a boon to the weary traveler! The clasp is a huge improvement, but too bulky. The dial is clearer to those who wear glasses like me and who cant see in the dark, and the bezel is practically indestructable (but the platinum easily marks) Got to be the GMt II my friend..... but as is always said, what sings to you , is the right choice! __________________ The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT

16 May 2008, 05:31 PM	#3
BiG JeEzY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jerome Location: N. California Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ Posts: 3,351	Hmmm, thats actually a difficult choice now that I think of it. I say that it would be the GMT II (non ceramic) by a very narrow margin though I would really wish that there was an option to have both. However my opinion is just mines, my advice is to go with the watch that smiles at you the most. Just lay them side by side, I think that is when you can make a decision on which one you really want to go with. __________________ -Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial

16 May 2008, 06:10 PM	#5
Baptistman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Real Name: Jon Location: UK Posts: 2,405	Well imo having tried both on, I prefer the classic 16710. I found it more comfortable, plus I just feel the new GMT as nice looking as it is, is to fussy for an every day tool watch. The 16710 is a Rolex Classic. imo the new GMT would of benefited from an all satin braclelet for real tool watch appeal Any excuse to post a photo Attached Images __________________ Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it

16 May 2008, 06:20 PM	#6
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	I've owned an SS GMT IIc. Although I initially liked the watch, I would have no doubt what to choose if I wore to opt between the new and old GMT II. I'd definately go for the OLD GMT II ! __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

16 May 2008, 06:03 PM	#4
Magik Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Patrick Location: Royal Kunia, HI Watch: Sub-Date & GMT ll Posts: 603	I prefer the older GMT ll over the ceramic version. I don't really care how the case blends into the bracelet on the ceramic version. My vote would be for the "Coke."

16 May 2008, 07:19 PM	#7
^fai^ Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Singapore Posts: 231	I would think of the old GMT II looks more classic I will vote for old GMT II

16 May 2008, 07:35 PM	#8
dopeymuppet "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: UK Posts: 184	I tried a GMTIIc on at the AD the other day and I thought that it was awesome quite frankly. So clean and the ceramic bezel looks incredible!

16 May 2008, 07:39 PM	#9
PhilM "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Phil Location: London Watch: Sea-Dweller Posts: 1,765	GMT II for me also

16 May 2008, 07:54 PM	#10
shoppy "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Simon Location: UK Watch: OP and daytona Posts: 1,783	GMT IIc, had both and sold the old GMT II.

16 May 2008, 08:02 PM	#11
danberger Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: England Posts: 500	I have just received a package in the last half hour that has in it.......my new GMTIIc - have to say its the only Rolex that has ever blown me away.... which in my mind indicates that if you like the more modern look this is the one to go for. The older models look far to retro for me. The green hand is fab !

16 May 2008, 08:39 PM	#12
Scarface "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Minas Location: London UK Watch: Rolex , Omega Posts: 1,370	Get the Coke __________________ *Rolex* Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master ll *Rolex* Oyster Perpetual Datejust *Omega* Seamaster Professional Chronograph

16 May 2008, 09:02 PM	#13
cmcm3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Scotland Posts: 1,112	I would go with the older model. They are tougher to get, and the GMTIIC isnt going anywhere for quite a while, so if you change your mind in future it will be easy to get hold of one.

16 May 2008, 09:14 PM	#14
stnmikita "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Brian Location: East Coast Posts: 254	A am going through a similar debate and posted a few days ago asking if there was an issue with the GMT-IIc due to the (seemingly) large number of people who bought the ceramic and later got rid of it. This thread has provided more information on why folks chose to sell their ceramic or get rid of it for another watch. I still lean toward the ceramic, but with a brushed bracelet. Check out this link: http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...82#msg_3696117 If I go IIc, I'll be doing the same.

16 May 2008, 09:37 PM	#15
goldenlace Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Philippines Posts: 28	HI, i would go for the gmt II classic but much depends on what you like more. take a look at the AD and choose what you like more 8)

16 May 2008, 09:39 PM	#16
HDHNTER "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Allen Location: SC Posts: 2,766	I would go with the Coke. __________________ Instagram @HDHNTER

16 May 2008, 10:32 PM	#17
Texsubmariner "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Khanh Location: Texas Watch: SSGMTc Posts: 1,227	That's a tough choice to make. I generally like the ceramic bezel and the updated solid links and clasp of the 116710. I could pass on the maxi dial and polished center links. Overall, I like the ceramic version in that it looks great with shorts or tux. I vote for the ceramic by a close margin. __________________ Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series

16 May 2008, 11:02 PM	#18
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,216	Best way is to try both on and that should tell you what's best. But if you're asking me the classic 16710 GMT "Coke" is the way to go. Good luck, dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

17 May 2008, 12:41 AM	#19
vjb.knife Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Vince Location: Pittsburgh, PA Watch: Rolex Sub & GMTIIC Posts: 626	I like the new model the best ..... Both are great choices but I Like the new model more, because of the crown, parachrom spring and the bracelet.

17 May 2008, 12:42 AM	#20
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,514	That classic black/red GMT will become harder to find over time.. __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

17 May 2008, 12:55 AM	#21
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Option number 2. Why you not try a Pepsi?

17 May 2008, 01:18 AM	#22
GMTII Owner "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: John Location: Nashville, TN Watch: S/S GMT Master IIc Posts: 1,210	IIc __________________

17 May 2008, 01:20 AM	#23
S/SOnly "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: The Desert Watch: GMT II RN Posts: 339	16710 Black/Burgundy is a fav.... It smiles at me daily. __________________ 904L..... Clean, Simple, Durable....

17 May 2008, 01:24 AM	#24
Randy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Randy Location: Ohio Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai Posts: 1,241	GMT llc, New design, New bracelet, watch is a stunner in person!!

17 May 2008, 03:10 AM	#25
ZROLEX Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: DC Posts: 469	GMT IIC!!!!!!!! Love the watch every day more and more!!!!!!! You will love it too!!!!!

17 May 2008, 03:32 AM	#26
zak98 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: TN Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,166	just picked up a gmt 2 pepsi last night. m serial number. tried on the gmt2c, LV, milgauss, and explorer 2... but the pepsi spoke to me once i actually tried it on. not sure if it does have the 3186, but it does have the "stick" gmt 2 vs. the roman numerals, seemed to pass the wiggle test. but either way.. i am very happy with it. __________________ Z- Submariner; P- Airking; R- DateJust; M- GMTII; C0 - Milgauss GV Breitling SuperOcean Heritage 46 Omega Speedmaster Racing Panerai PAM390

17 May 2008, 03:47 AM	#27
nje39 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: nj Posts: 69	coke all the way..................or coke zero

17 May 2008, 04:25 AM	#28
petah "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Ottawa Posts: 39	GMT II, the polished bracelet on the IIc really ruined the watch IMO.

17 May 2008, 04:33 AM	#29
Hamilton Carvalho Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: New York Posts: 1,225	Not an easy one. I would take the 16710 due to the fact that it is no longer in production. But, the 116710 would certainly be my next whenever I could afford it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)