ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RogerF · 1 February 2006, 08:13 PM

What are some Rolex models in the market that the avg person just wouldnt understand why we go so gaga googoo over? Discuss...

I guess we can start with the obvious which is the SS daytona, to a collector most of the time its the thrill of the hunt, the holy grail of Rolexes etc. The other side is that the avg person doesnt get our facination with some of the SS Professional models that scream heritage. To the avg person its a watch that is worth a lot more used than it is new or you have to wait 1000000 years for one if you are not "in" with a dealer.

Another would be the Submariner 14060M, the watch is worth over $5000Cdn and doesnt even have a date. Further more for ppl who do know a bit about watches its a watch that isnt even COSC.

Finally the Explorer, again a watch that isnt that special looking. There are tons of watches out there that have arabic numerals, Rolex itself has the airking and DJ (which has a date for the same money or less). For the same money there are lots of brands out there that can offer more watch for less money.

Many who are not like us will argue to the death that we buy for the name, but they just dont get it.

(Inspired by somebodys sig here, If you don't get it, you probably never will....)

1 February 2006, 11:01 PM

I think most people 'don't get' expensive watches, period. Just yesterday a colleague actually noticed my watch and said 'is that a Rolex?'

I said yes, and she said, 'they cost close to $10,000... why would anyone spend that much on a watch?'

I told her 'either you get it or you don't, and if you have to ask, you don't get it.'

See, I use the forum in real life too!

Mr. K · 1 February 2006, 11:40 PM

I have to agree. Some people do not get why one would spend so much on a watch.

But I myself would not spend a ton of money on say a very fine wine. I like wine, but to me it is not worth it to spend a lot of money. Why? Because I have not developed that level of appreciation yet. In the same way some people may have not developed an deep appreciation for watches.

But to get back to the original question. I would agree that the SS daytona is a tough one to figure out. I speak from personal experience, although it is a nice watch, it does not do a lot for me.

The explorer on the other hand is quickly becoming one of my favorites. In fact the only watch I seem to wear lately. When a friend saw it, his coment was, why bother, you can't even tell it is a Rolex. My response was, "exactly."

2 February 2006, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. K

But to get back to the original question. I would agree that the SS daytona is a tough one to figure out. I speak from personal experience, although it is a nice watch, it does not do a lot for me.

Exactly!

2 February 2006, 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RogerF

I guess we can start with the obvious which is the SS daytona, to a collector most of the time its the thrill of the hunt, the holy grail of Rolexes etc.

I used to be under the SS Daytona's siren song, but after much thought, I decided that while it is likely the best chronograph around, I don't have any use for a chronograph function and more importantly, I will not cough up the huge premium you pay on a watch that is bastardized and lionized by professional flippers.

It's a great watch, but now it does absolutely nothing for me. Not in SS, TT or gold. I can appreciate them (particularly the WG with meteorite dial), but that's as far as it goes for me.

JJ Irani · 2 February 2006, 03:01 AM

I think most entry level Rollies which are dateless and non-COSC certified, would be puzzling to the commoner out there. I mean, even they are expensive watches and I suppose a layman would still want to know why so much cash was doled out for something that merely tells time and bugger all else!!

JJ Irani · 2 February 2006, 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atomic

I used to be under the SS Daytona's siren song, but after much thought, I decided that while it is likely the best chronograph around, I don't have any use for a chronograph function and more importantly, I will not cough up the huge premium you pay on a watch that is bastardized and lionized by professional flippers.

It's a great watch, but now it does absolutely nothing for me. Not in SS, TT or gold. I can appreciate them (particularly the WG with meteorite dial), but that's as far as it goes for me.

I think you've summed that up perfectly, Johnny.

As superb a timepiece as it might be, the high price just does not justify us working people to go out there and plonk so much cash down on the dealer's counter for it.

Launch Mini · 2 February 2006, 03:22 AM

If some "chick" comments on the price of our watches, Ask her why she didn't buy her purse/shoes/skirt/jacket etc at Walmart. Why does she want the Louis Vuitton,Armani, etc.

2 February 2006, 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Launch Mini

If some "chick" comments on the price of our watches, Ask her why she didn't buy her purse/shoes/skirt/jacket etc at Walmart. Why does she want the Louis Vuitton,Armani, etc.

I used a similar tactic when my wife gives me grief. I just point to her mountain of shoes and say, 'pardon?'

C.J. · 2 February 2006, 03:26 AM

I think Darens signature says it all. If they have to ask, they just don't get it. People think I'm crazy for spending so much on a watch. And even more crazy for wearing it everywhere.
If the NON BELIEVERS

buy an expensive watch they seem to opt for a less expensive brand with alot more bling. I don' think they understand the history, craftsmanship,and heritage of Rolex or the magnitude of their accomplishments over the years.
I would think the 14060m would be the model most confusing to those who are not afflicted with this addiction of ours. They see simple and plain, not classic and timeless. very much the same as with the Exp 1.

baseballduck · 2 February 2006, 05:43 AM

Like C.J. said Darens signature says it all. Some of my friends wonder why I want a watch that costs that much. I'm usually just a smartass about it and just say "Why not?". Speaking of the explorer I one of the guys who works where my dad does just got one. From what it sounds like it was a great deal too. He got it LNIB for like $2,500 if I'm not mistaking. I think it's a fairly recent model too. This is the same guy who I will try to get to get me a used Rollie for the first one. Yay! Oh, that was completley off topic wasn't it? Schweet!

Tyler

Rackness · 2 February 2006, 07:18 AM

it has already been stated perfectly but it is definatly either you get it or you don't. if some one feels that high end watches are not worth it and over priced it is a dead conversation no amount of talk and explanation will change their mind.

i must agree i really like the daytona but for anything more than msrp. they can pound sand it is not that nice.

all the best,
Jason

Rodentman · 2 February 2006, 08:23 AM

I owned a black SS Daytona twice and sold it both times. I have no need for a chronograph, and disliked the polished center links and bezel. I DID like the clasp and solid center links however.

I'd like to see those bracelet improvements on the SS sport models, but the price will go up accordingly, and I think I wouldn't pay over $5K for a sub or SD.

dman · 2 February 2006, 03:04 PM

For me there is one watch that does not get the credit it deserves. I would think it would have the same hype that surrounds the SS Daytona. I mean the watch is simple, beautiful and more rare even.

Why has the Yacht-Marinier not caught on anywhere other than Atlantic City?

dman · 2 February 2006, 03:05 PM

Oh yeah, my signature, like Johnny said, sums it all up baby!!

1 February 2006, 08:13 PM	#1
RogerF "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Duh! Location: Toronto Canada Watch: a gonna do? Posts: 2,573	Which models do you feel some ppl just dont get? What are some Rolex models in the market that the avg person just wouldnt understand why we go so gaga googoo over? Discuss... I guess we can start with the obvious which is the SS daytona, to a collector most of the time its the thrill of the hunt, the holy grail of Rolexes etc. The other side is that the avg person doesnt get our facination with some of the SS Professional models that scream heritage. To the avg person its a watch that is worth a lot more used than it is new or you have to wait 1000000 years for one if you are not "in" with a dealer. Another would be the Submariner 14060M, the watch is worth over $5000Cdn and doesnt even have a date. Further more for ppl who do know a bit about watches its a watch that isnt even COSC. Finally the Explorer, again a watch that isnt that special looking. There are tons of watches out there that have arabic numerals, Rolex itself has the airking and DJ (which has a date for the same money or less). For the same money there are lots of brands out there that can offer more watch for less money. Many who are not like us will argue to the death that we buy for the name, but they just dont get it. (Inspired by somebodys sig here, If you don't get it, you probably never will....)

2 February 2006, 03:01 AM	#6
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	I think most entry level Rollies which are dateless and non-COSC certified, would be puzzling to the commoner out there. I mean, even they are expensive watches and I suppose a layman would still want to know why so much cash was doled out for something that merely tells time and bugger all else!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

2 February 2006, 03:22 AM	#8
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	If some "chick" comments on the price of our watches, Ask her why she didn't buy her purse/shoes/skirt/jacket etc at Walmart. Why does she want the Louis Vuitton,Armani, etc. __________________ Something witty to go here. Member # 293

2 February 2006, 05:43 AM	#11
baseballduck "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Tyler Location: Pinehurst NC Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 1,018	Like C.J. said Darens signature says it all. Some of my friends wonder why I want a watch that costs that much. I'm usually just a smartass about it and just say "Why not?". Speaking of the explorer I one of the guys who works where my dad does just got one. From what it sounds like it was a great deal too. He got it LNIB for like $2,500 if I'm not mistaking. I think it's a fairly recent model too. This is the same guy who I will try to get to get me a used Rollie for the first one. Yay! Oh, that was completley off topic wasn't it? Schweet! Tyler __________________ Sedit qui timuit ne non succederet. Member #84

2 February 2006, 08:23 AM	#13
Rodentman Banned Join Date: Aug 2005 Real Name: ACCT CLOSED Location: - Posts: 1,497	SS Daytona I owned a black SS Daytona twice and sold it both times. I have no need for a chronograph, and disliked the polished center links and bezel. I DID like the clasp and solid center links however. I'd like to see those bracelet improvements on the SS sport models, but the price will go up accordingly, and I think I wouldn't pay over $5K for a sub or SD.

1 February 2006, 11:01 PM	#2
Atomic Guest Posts: n/a	I think most people 'don't get' expensive watches, period. Just yesterday a colleague actually noticed my watch and said 'is that a Rolex?' I said yes, and she said, 'they cost close to $10,000... why would anyone spend that much on a watch?' I told her 'either you get it or you don't, and if you have to ask, you don't get it.' See, I use the forum in real life too!

1 February 2006, 11:40 PM	#3
Mr. K "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Mark Location: Seattle-ish Posts: 6,078	I have to agree. Some people do not get why one would spend so much on a watch. But I myself would not spend a ton of money on say a very fine wine. I like wine, but to me it is not worth it to spend a lot of money. Why? Because I have not developed that level of appreciation yet. In the same way some people may have not developed an deep appreciation for watches. But to get back to the original question. I would agree that the SS daytona is a tough one to figure out. I speak from personal experience, although it is a nice watch, it does not do a lot for me. The explorer on the other hand is quickly becoming one of my favorites. In fact the only watch I seem to wear lately. When a friend saw it, his coment was, why bother, you can't even tell it is a Rolex. My response was, "exactly."

2 February 2006, 03:26 AM	#10
C.J. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: * Posts: 10,196	I think Darens signature says it all. If they have to ask, they just don't get it. People think I'm crazy for spending so much on a watch. And even more crazy for wearing it everywhere. If the NON BELIEVERS buy an expensive watch they seem to opt for a less expensive brand with alot more bling. I don' think they understand the history, craftsmanship,and heritage of Rolex or the magnitude of their accomplishments over the years. I would think the 14060m would be the model most confusing to those who are not afflicted with this addiction of ours. They see simple and plain, not classic and timeless. very much the same as with the Exp 1.

2 February 2006, 07:18 AM	#12
Rackness "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Harford County MD Posts: 393	it has already been stated perfectly but it is definatly either you get it or you don't. if some one feels that high end watches are not worth it and over priced it is a dead conversation no amount of talk and explanation will change their mind. i must agree i really like the daytona but for anything more than msrp. they can pound sand it is not that nice. all the best, Jason

2 February 2006, 03:04 PM	#14
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	For me there is one watch that does not get the credit it deserves. I would think it would have the same hype that surrounds the SS Daytona. I mean the watch is simple, beautiful and more rare even. Why has the Yacht-Marinier not caught on anywhere other than Atlantic City? __________________ You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.

2 February 2006, 03:05 PM	#15
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	Oh yeah, my signature, like Johnny said, sums it all up baby!! __________________ You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)