ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mario belgium · 30 May 2015, 05:12 AM

Am i making myself crazy but i'm looking on daily base to pictures off the 15202 and i have the blue 15400,which i like but now i have my doubt.Who make this move and never looked back?

thomaspp · 30 May 2015, 05:24 AM

I did.....

Name: ImageUploadedByTapatalk1432927450.059517.jpg
Views: 548
Size: 87.2 KB

Name: ImageUploadedByTapatalk1432927467.660103.jpg
Views: 545
Size: 68.8 KB

Name: ImageUploadedByTapatalk1432927479.644678.jpg
Views: 551
Size: 59.8 KB

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

texex91 · 30 May 2015, 05:24 AM

I haven't made the move...but I would.

s14roller · 30 May 2015, 05:52 AM

Try it on and make a call then.

zama · 30 May 2015, 09:17 AM

I would not from blue to blue, cant see the value exchange, not to mention I like second hands.....

Bhakak · 30 May 2015, 09:34 AM

I agree with zama. I am in love with the blue dial and bigger size of the royal oak 15400, but if I had the choice to go from silver dial or black dial 15400 to a blue dial 15202 I might do it.

ap1 · 30 May 2015, 09:54 AM

Um hello. Yes!

bahbahani · 30 May 2015, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ap1

Um hello. Yes!

So sweet!

And as far as i'm concerned, it depends on the wrist size. If it's a small wrist go for the 15202, if it's a big wrist stay with the 15400

Abdullasaif · 30 May 2015, 07:14 PM

Just do it!

bbbonthemoon · 30 May 2015, 07:58 PM

15202 is more rare and expensive, but in my eyes 15400 is simply better all around. When you compare it, 15400 always looks to me like eyes opener or fresh air to breathe. I believe 41 is a perfect size for RO, unless you have really small wrist.

travisb · 30 May 2015, 10:15 PM

Jumbo is the only way to go. I've owned the 15300 and 15400 but there is no substitute for the 15202 in my opinion.

AK797 · 30 May 2015, 10:16 PM

Both nice but I think the 202 is better proportioned, unless you have large wrists, and it has a nicer rotor.

wisguy · 31 May 2015, 12:33 AM

I want to do it... pretty sure I would not regret it

GB-man · 31 May 2015, 01:24 AM

I would. Just traded my 15400 and will consider a jumbo down the line. I like the thin light case

TheMethod · 31 May 2015, 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travisb

Jumbo is the only way to go. I've owned the 15300 and 15400 but there is no substitute for the 15202 in my opinion.

100% agree

masterserg · 31 May 2015, 05:50 AM

Jumbo!

AS1 · 31 May 2015, 07:11 AM

do it, Jumbo is the classic

Snow-Dweller · 31 May 2015, 07:45 AM

Don't do it!

I love my 15400. The idea of spending thousands to not have a second hand is nonsense to me. Put the money to one side to buy another piece.

Lemarp · 31 May 2015, 08:38 AM

Personal preference here. You're always going to get very polarizing views on this question.

Personally I like the idea of second hands on all my mechanical watches and I love the silver dial. I can also see why people would prefer the Jumbo but to me, it's simply not worth the price difference.

30 May 2015, 05:12 AM	#1
mario belgium "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: belgium Watch: Rolex,2xHeuer Posts: 352	Ap 15400 to 15202 ? Am i making myself crazy but i'm looking on daily base to pictures off the 15202 and i have the blue 15400,which i like but now i have my doubt.Who make this move and never looked back?

30 May 2015, 05:24 AM	#2
thomaspp "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: N/A Posts: 11,137	I did..... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Instagram: @watches_anonymous

30 May 2015, 09:17 AM	#5
zama "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Craig Location: Sydney Watch: 4 Broken glass Posts: 5,808	I would not from blue to blue, cant see the value exchange, not to mention I like second hands..... __________________ Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze

30 May 2015, 09:54 AM	#7
ap1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,537	Um hello. Yes! Attached Images

31 May 2015, 12:33 AM	#13
wisguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Earth Posts: 2,406	I want to do it... pretty sure I would not regret it __________________ 5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation

30 May 2015, 05:24 AM	#3
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	I haven't made the move...but I would.

30 May 2015, 05:52 AM	#4
s14roller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: US Posts: 3,257	Try it on and make a call then.

30 May 2015, 09:34 AM	#6
Bhakak "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: California Posts: 64	I agree with zama. I am in love with the blue dial and bigger size of the royal oak 15400, but if I had the choice to go from silver dial or black dial 15400 to a blue dial 15202 I might do it.

30 May 2015, 07:14 PM	#9
Abdullasaif "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Dubai Watch: bipolar Posts: 2,854	Just do it!

30 May 2015, 07:58 PM	#10
bbbonthemoon "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Cyprus Posts: 15	15202 is more rare and expensive, but in my eyes 15400 is simply better all around. When you compare it, 15400 always looks to me like eyes opener or fresh air to breathe. I believe 41 is a perfect size for RO, unless you have really small wrist.

30 May 2015, 10:15 PM	#11
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,489	Jumbo is the only way to go. I've owned the 15300 and 15400 but there is no substitute for the 15202 in my opinion.

30 May 2015, 10:16 PM	#12
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	Both nice but I think the 202 is better proportioned, unless you have large wrists, and it has a nicer rotor.

31 May 2015, 01:24 AM	#14
GB-man 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 37,355	I would. Just traded my 15400 and will consider a jumbo down the line. I like the thin light case __________________

31 May 2015, 05:50 AM	#16
masterserg "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Serg Location: US of A Watch: AP Posts: 7,437	Jumbo! __________________ How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????

31 May 2015, 07:11 AM	#17
AS1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: NYC / Milan Watch: 6263 Posts: 3,938	do it, Jumbo is the classic

31 May 2015, 07:45 AM	#18
Snow-Dweller 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Clive Location: The Alps Watch: collections change Posts: 6,284	Don't do it! I love my 15400. The idea of spending thousands to not have a second hand is nonsense to me. Put the money to one side to buy another piece. __________________ . The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings... ——————————————————————————————————— . 16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D.

31 May 2015, 08:38 AM	#19
Lemarp "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Toronto Posts: 168	Personal preference here. You're always going to get very polarizing views on this question. Personally I like the idea of second hands on all my mechanical watches and I love the silver dial. I can also see why people would prefer the Jumbo but to me, it's simply not worth the price difference.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)