ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cab56 · 1 July 2015, 09:54 AM

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-Dayton...item28029915e1

Seller has zero feedback. The second hand on the chrono seems to be hiding a badly done coronet.

mjm800 · 1 July 2015, 10:08 AM

The crown at 12 looks all out of whack. The tips look like they are touching but are hidden behind the seconds hand.

Velox · 1 July 2015, 10:26 AM

Also the 85 and 90 on the bezel seem so almost touch the striped markers. I don't know if this is normal for a specific period daytona but it looks different then the genuine daytona pic i see.
Edit: everything is way off,dial to small/bezel too big, the positioning of the subdials in relation the lumed markers.

Blong · 1 July 2015, 01:22 PM

When you go into the auction...look at the clasp! Fake!

crfsocal · 1 July 2015, 01:56 PM

Fake

djemmtee · 1 July 2015, 02:15 PM

yikes...

crowncollection · 1 July 2015, 06:48 PM

No go imho

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kooltzar · 1 July 2015, 07:00 PM

Fake

hunterp27 · 2 July 2015, 03:23 AM

looks fake to me but dang it these are getting better and better. its gonna trip someone up if we don't kill this auction. reported.

Jemspeed · 2 July 2015, 04:53 AM

The coronet is too round at the bottom, it should flatten out a bit. Also, on the black dials, the lines in between the number on the sub-dials should touch the inner ring of the dial

AbsolutelyROLEX! · 2 July 2015, 09:33 AM

Easy way to tell guys, the silver subdial bands are much too wide/thick than gen, easy way to tell, they are always off

trackntrail · 2 July 2015, 10:20 AM

Reported the auction.

GradyPhilpott · 2 July 2015, 12:23 PM

It's a mess.

cajunron · 2 July 2015, 12:31 PM

Reported. Say bye-bye.

cab56 · 2 July 2015, 11:11 PM

gone!!

Mezz72 · 4 July 2015, 07:30 PM

the fake daytonas all have pushers that are too long, like what you see in the OP pictures.
the band of the sub dials are also too thick.

iclick · 5 July 2015, 04:50 AM

Subdials are not in the correct positions. Fake.

1 July 2015, 09:54 AM	#1
cab56 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Real Name: Chris Location: Canada Watch: many! Posts: 1,134	suspicious Daytona http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-Dayton...item28029915e1 Seller has zero feedback. The second hand on the chrono seems to be hiding a badly done coronet. Attached Images

1 July 2015, 10:08 AM	#2
mjm800 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Posts: 1,950	The crown at 12 looks all out of whack. The tips look like they are touching but are hidden behind the seconds hand. __________________

1 July 2015, 02:15 PM	#6
djemmtee "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2006 Real Name: Mike Location: Tustin Watch: LV Sub Posts: 1,940	yikes... __________________ 116610 LN 116713 LN Instagram: rolexfan69

1 July 2015, 06:48 PM	#7
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	No go imho Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

2 July 2015, 09:33 AM	#11
AbsolutelyROLEX! "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: AKA: ANDERL712000 Posts: 4,935	Easy way to tell guys, the silver subdial bands are much too wide/thick than gen, easy way to tell, they are always off __________________ We want to be the first in the field and Rolex should be seen as the one and only-the best. Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex founder

1 July 2015, 10:26 AM	#3
Velox "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Aruba Posts: 198	Also the 85 and 90 on the bezel seem so almost touch the striped markers. I don't know if this is normal for a specific period daytona but it looks different then the genuine daytona pic i see. Edit: everything is way off,dial to small/bezel too big, the positioning of the subdials in relation the lumed markers.

1 July 2015, 01:22 PM	#4
Blong "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Brian Location: Manhattan Watch: 116520 Black Posts: 287	When you go into the auction...look at the clasp! Fake!

1 July 2015, 01:56 PM	#5
crfsocal "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 690	Fake

1 July 2015, 07:00 PM	#8
kooltzar "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Zürich Watch: Submariner 5512 Posts: 922	Fake

2 July 2015, 03:23 AM	#9
hunterp27 Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: JHP Location: Fairview, TX Watch: WG 18039 Day/Date Posts: 789	looks fake to me but dang it these are getting better and better. its gonna trip someone up if we don't kill this auction. reported.

2 July 2015, 04:53 AM	#10
Jemspeed "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 199	The coronet is too round at the bottom, it should flatten out a bit. Also, on the black dials, the lines in between the number on the sub-dials should touch the inner ring of the dial

2 July 2015, 10:20 AM	#12
trackntrail "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: San Francisco Watch: BLRO Posts: 502	Reported the auction.

2 July 2015, 12:23 PM	#13
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK047 Posts: 34,460	It's a mess. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

2 July 2015, 12:31 PM	#14
cajunron 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ronnie Location: Southeastern USA Watch: Omega Seamaster PO Posts: 3,872	Reported. Say bye-bye. __________________

2 July 2015, 11:11 PM	#15
cab56 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Real Name: Chris Location: Canada Watch: many! Posts: 1,134	gone!!

4 July 2015, 07:30 PM	#16
Mezz72 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Singapore Posts: 618	the fake daytonas all have pushers that are too long, like what you see in the OP pictures. the band of the sub dials are also too thick.

5 July 2015, 04:50 AM	#17
iclick "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Louisiana Posts: 813	Subdials are not in the correct positions. Fake. __________________ GMT 1675 SS (1969) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79170 white-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79180 black-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Sub 79090 (1992)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)