ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 July 2015, 06:21 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: california
Watch: 116610LV/SD4000
Posts: 209
|
SeaDweller Diver's extention question.
I been wearing my SD4K for about a month now with the divers extension. I heard many people remove them. Is it a compromise when wearing them? Do anyone else wear theirs with or should I remove it. Thanks!
|
12 July 2015, 06:26 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Cab
Location: A small world
Watch: es
Posts: 776
|
I will be removing mine too, from the construction of it, removing it looks safe.
|
12 July 2015, 09:26 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
I've found that removing it makes for a more comfortable fit.
|
12 July 2015, 09:29 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Definitely recommend removal. Easy enough to put it back on if you change your mind.
|
12 July 2015, 09:38 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,120
|
Anyone have a picture they can post? Why is the diver extension necessary in the first place?
|
12 July 2015, 09:57 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Lee
Location: London
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 264
|
To wear over a dive suit!
|
12 July 2015, 09:58 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,120
|
|
12 July 2015, 11:19 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
13 July 2015, 08:37 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: PH & France
Watch: Rolex SD4000
Posts: 203
|
Can't remove it. I use it for diving...
__________________
Rolex Date 1500 1965 || Rolex DateJust 68240 1986 || Rolex Explorer II 16570 2009 || Rolex Sea-Dweller SD4 116600 2015 || |
13 July 2015, 08:45 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
I removed it on my DSSD and the difference was night and day!! I found it was far more comfortable without it. No pics, but worth trying!!
|
13 July 2015, 09:06 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,120
|
Interesting .... What makes it more comfortable? Does it have to do with the glidelock claps being longer?
|
13 July 2015, 09:13 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southeast
Watch: Divers, GMT
Posts: 2,149
|
I removed mine and it fits great. Much better than with it. Just get the appropriate screwdriver and loctite if you do it yourself. Or take to an AD.
|
13 July 2015, 11:49 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
The extension is fairly long Brian, so when it is removed the links never seem to stick out of the clasp like they do with the extension in. So when you adjust in or out there is more flexibility. This makes the watch lay better on the wrist, or at least what I found.
|
13 July 2015, 12:51 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
Especially with smaller wrists, removing the diver's extension really helps with making the bracelet overall more flexible and hence more comfortable. Otherwise, there's a significant section of the overall loop that is solid/inflexible. On my DSSD, was a significant improvement in fit and comfort removing the diver's extension. |
|
13 July 2015, 01:14 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
|
13 July 2015, 01:24 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
|
|
13 July 2015, 01:47 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 162
|
I took mine out immediately after I took the stickers off.
|
13 July 2015, 01:58 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
|
13 July 2015, 04:48 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Lee
Location: London
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 264
|
That link is an incredible piece of design. I'm keeping mine on as it's part of the soul of the watch.
|
13 July 2015, 06:08 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Same here - it was my first experience of the new style bracelet which is a great piece of design and engineering, but it definitely feels better with the dive extension off. Seems like a lot of people have done this?
|
13 July 2015, 06:13 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
|
I dive every summer, so the extention is very useful for me...
|
13 July 2015, 06:13 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
|
|
13 July 2015, 11:52 PM | #23 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Quote:
|
|
14 July 2015, 12:25 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Willem
Location: Pretoria RSA
Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX
Posts: 1,072
|
I removed the extension from my DSSD and D-Blue, when I received them - I do'nt dive.
__________________
Rolex Datejust II WG/SS Blue 116334 "8368xxxx" Rolex Sea-Dweller SD43 126600 "94A6xxxx" Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller 116660 "V84xxxx" Rolex Deepsea D-Blue Horizon 116660 "3170xxxx" Rolex Explorer II Polar 16570 "T20xxxx" Rolex Explorer II Black 216570 "G53xxxx" Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "P32xxxx" Rolex GMT-Master II Ceramic 116710LN "V97xxxx" Rolex Submariner 16610 "Z61xxxx" Rolex Submariner Ceramic 116610LN "G79xxxx" |
16 July 2015, 08:51 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
|
Read all the descriptions of how removing the extension is supposed to increase comfort but just don't see it.
My wrist is about 7.25". The only part of my SDc that I would consider uncomfortable is the crown which occasionally digs into the back of my hand. But, any watch I wear with the crown at the 3 o'clock position does the same. Removing the extension doesn't help that. Other than that one issue the watch is comfortable. So, for me, it stays . . . |
16 July 2015, 09:26 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Cab
Location: A small world
Watch: es
Posts: 776
|
I have not removed mine yet, just once removed would the inner part of clasp scratch the links? Just a thought.
|
16 July 2015, 09:28 AM | #27 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,120
|
Quote:
|
|
16 July 2015, 10:03 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
|
16 July 2015, 11:17 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
I believe I would give it a shot, based on the comments from the members.
|
16 July 2015, 12:12 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Boston
Watch: And listen
Posts: 690
|
I too have removed the extension for comfort but added additional links due to my late wrist size and for diving as well.
Last edited by Joemck; 16 July 2015 at 12:14 PM.. Reason: Late=large. Not dead yet |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.