The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 August 2015, 02:45 PM   #1
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Anyone else take this route?

Hey everyone! First time in this neck of the woods so be nice

I have always been a Rolex and Omega guy. I recently acquired my first Panerai and as you can guess I have my heart set on a Royal Oak as my next watch.

For lack of a better term, the Royal Oak 15400st has been sort of a grail for me, except unlike most true "grails", I can own this watch one day. The question is, when? I've recently blown through my toy budget, so no matter what my next watch will likely not arrive in the very near future. Especially since venturing into the $15,000 range for a watch will take me a little while to be ready to commit.

With that said, there are of course other, cheaper watches that I love. There are always Rolexes on my radar, but there is one watch out there that has a similar look to the RO, in fact along with the Royal Oak, it comes from the genius mind of Gérald Genta.

It's the IWC Ingenieur 3239.

In the pre-owned market it can be had for more than $7k savings compared to the RO. The design is beautiful and regardless of what you're thinking, it IS a watch that I have always loved and seriously considered.

At around $4500-5500, It's actually reasonable to say, I could have this watch on my wrist before by the end of the year and maybe even by mid fall.

Here are my questions for you all...

Has anyone owned this Ingenieur Model?

If so how would you say it compares to the RO, in style, quality, design, feel, etc?

Does it seem like a decent idea to get this watch as a potential holdover, but allowing for the possibility that it may actually just scratch this itch permanently?

General thoughts?

Thank you all so much!
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 03:20 PM   #2
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
Save up and get the RO. I have handled the IWC and the RO and the additional price is justified IMHO.

If you get the IWC you will still be lusting after the RO and then you are just setting yourself back.
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 03:33 PM   #3
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Save for the RO
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 03:39 PM   #4
Abdullasaif
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dubai
Watch: bipolar
Posts: 2,854
Royal oak.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Abdullasaif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 05:21 PM   #5
masterkiller
"TRF" Member
 
masterkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex, AP & PAM...
Posts: 1,403
It is a great Watch, sure it does not come close the the AP RO but still a great great Watch, ETA based relieble movement, good overall quality feel, can be had at VERY resobly price in the seconh hand market...

I have not had one personally but several friends have had them, som pics..










Here side by side with my old AP RO 15300

__________________
Rolex - SubC...
AP - Diver...
Panerai - PAM380
Omega - Speedy PRO
masterkiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 06:22 PM   #6
theflywrist
"TRF" Member
 
theflywrist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 1,993
Not even close to an AP for me.
I would save if that's what you want.
theflywrist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 06:39 PM   #7
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
only one word

overseas.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 06:43 PM   #8
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Best IWC.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 07:21 PM   #9
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
The IWC is a nice watch, but it's doubtful that your itch will be fully scratched by it.
That said, buy pre-owned at the right price, and when funds permit the AP to be seriously considered, then you shouldn't have much trouble flipping the IWC, nor lose all that much on it, depending on how well you've managed to look after it cosmetically.

On the other hand, if you want an equivalent of the RO but without a matching price-tag, then as Tom suggested, a Vacheron Constantin Overseas is one you should look at, especially pre-owned.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 08:42 PM   #10
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,297
i would get it because you love it, not because it's similar to another watch you want.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 09:21 PM   #11
1st amg
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
1st amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: nicholas
Location: ottawa canada
Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai
Posts: 10,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
i would get it because you love it, not because it's similar to another watch you want.
Exactly, made this boo boo a few times and still ended up getting the "one" I really liked in the first place. Save up, you will not be satisfied until the AP is in your hands. Especially if you start hanging around in these neck of the woods, the AP becomes much more desirable.
1st amg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 09:25 PM   #12
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
All awesome advice and info! Thank you all.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 09:25 PM   #13
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
This is a huge help! Thank you very much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by masterkiller View Post
It is a great Watch, sure it does not come close the the AP RO but still a great great Watch, ETA based relieble movement, good overall quality feel, can be had at VERY resobly price in the seconh hand market...

I have not had one personally but several friends have had them, som pics..










Here side by side with my old AP RO 15300

Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 10:11 PM   #14
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,536
I like the idea of preowned vc overseas mentioned above. Bracelet is amazing and the finishing makes it much more the peer than that iwc. You'll still be dreaming of the ap if you get that iwc. A mistake I'm all too familiar with
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 10:58 PM   #15
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
i would get it because you love it, not because it's similar to another watch you want.
This.

My guess is that even if you get the IWC, you'll eventually get the AP. It's just going to cost you more time and money to get there.
__________________
----------------------
Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 12:55 AM   #16
Le Chef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
Don't buy substitutes

It will cost you more in the long run. The RO is worth saving for and getting what you really want rather than responding half-heartedly with a substitute.
Le Chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 01:09 AM   #17
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
There is just something about the RO, so I'd say that piece.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 02:12 AM   #18
SpunkyQ8
"TRF" Member
 
SpunkyQ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Aj
Location: Kuwait
Watch: RM,AP,PP,RLX,PAM
Posts: 1,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Chef View Post
It will cost you more in the long run. The RO is worth saving for and getting what you really want rather than responding half-heartedly with a substitute.
x2
SpunkyQ8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 02:17 AM   #19
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
I can't condone place holders
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 02:41 AM   #20
sirish19
"TRF" Member
 
sirish19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Tokyo
Watch: PP-VC-AP
Posts: 1,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
I can't condone place holders
Totally agree, you'll never be satisfied with an interim. You've got enough in your collection to tide you over so definitely save up for the RO if that is your grail watch and within your reach in the near term.

Good luck.
__________________
sirish19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 02:49 AM   #21
NoVaSubowner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: Love them.
Posts: 1,095
Take the advice of someone who tried place holding with a 3239....... Don't do it. Save for the RO. Would have been cheaper for me to do so.....
NoVaSubowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 02:52 AM   #22
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I'd save for the RO, next to the RO and Nautilus the IWC is a little plain/uninspired in design for a Genta.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 03:39 AM   #23
s14roller
"TRF" Member
 
s14roller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
Do it once, do it right. It'll be cheaper that way.
s14roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 03:55 AM   #24
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoVaSubowner View Post
Take the advice of someone who tried place holding with a 3239....... Don't do it. Save for the RO. Would have been cheaper for me to do so.....
ok this is the exact advice i needed (not necessarily wanted ;) to hear.

Thank you!
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 04:05 AM   #25
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Ok IWC is a good watch company, but clearly not at the level of AP, PP, ALS, VC and a few others, so depends on you, I wouldn't but you say you always liked it, just be sure to buy it right if you do, like this when you're ready for the RO you can sell the IWC with not a huge hit on resale...
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 05:03 AM   #26
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,637
While I do like IWC and many of their models (I used to have a 3706), agree with others that you're better off waiting and saving for the AP.
eonflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 05:05 AM   #27
hdfb910
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Pete
Location: Texas
Posts: 571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Chef View Post
It will cost you more in the long run. The RO is worth saving for and getting what you really want rather than responding half-heartedly with a substitute.
This...
I would hold for the AP, if you still want the IWC after the AP then get that too. I would swing for the fences first though on what you really want.
hdfb910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 10:20 AM   #28
waisoserious
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: 116515LN, 126621
Posts: 180
I have a Ingenieur Chrono and a ROC. While I enjoy them both the Ingenieur could never replace the AP or provide the same amount of enjoyment. I dont think the Ingenieur could make you happy if you already have your heart set on an AP. You will only regret it as time goes by once you start to realize what a large portion of the AP's purchase price the IWC represents.
waisoserious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2015, 06:21 PM   #29
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
I really don't get all this waiting malarky being advised – it's not as if the IWC is an unsaleable commodity, especially bought at the right price.
As I said in another thread, live in the here and now, not for what the future may bring.

So with that said, get it, wear it, enjoy it, and then sell it when the rest of the funds are in place for the RO.
And don't restrict yourself to buying new, go for a pre-owned one, which keeps more money in your pocket and help you achieve your goal sooner.
It's just plain old-fashioned common sense.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2015, 07:16 AM   #30
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Well I just want to thank you all for the responses, especially the varying opinions. I think i will likely be holding out for the RO, and hopefully getting it sooner than later!

Next question, currently I have no plan to get rid of my Rolex Sub 116610LVC, but of course the thought has crossed my mind considering the trade or sale value would certainly fast track the Royal Oak.

So with that said, I know the Royal Oak will likely not compare to the sub as far as hard use, but if I were to consider it a replacement to my sub, is it considered to easily withstand the wear of daily use (not abuse), including swimming, showering, traveling, banging door jams and macbook pros, and all the other newb-esque light damage concerns prior to a huge purchase?

Thanks again!
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.