ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 June 2008, 03:16 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
Daytona Movement Hairspring Info
I came across this article while surfing over yonder and it poses some interesting information on the why's and when's of the introduciton of the Parachrome hairspring to the Daytona lineup.
There's also some stuff on dial variations in the Daytona series. Enjoy. |
21 June 2008, 03:47 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Very cool. Rolex does beta testing without telling anyone! I'm guessing they would have fixed it completely if there was any problems with it.
__________________
member#3242 |
21 June 2008, 03:51 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
There is always a bit of industrial secrecy, and with it espionage as well, in hi-tech horology.
Some of the best kept secrets of the watch world would make for a thrilling who-dun-it novel.........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
21 June 2008, 03:52 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Quote:
"Then, someone sent to me the below pictured internal Rolex two page document (they asked to remain anonymous) which answers the question." If so, that is pretty slimy, but I'm asking myself, why would he do that?
__________________
member#3242 |
|
21 June 2008, 04:04 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
No, the point I was going to make is that Mr. Holbrook, for some time, insisted that the original 4130's did not have a parachrome hairspring because they were not blue..
Mr. Dowling disagreed with this position, and this article seems to be an about face. However, I thought better of this approach and edited my comments....you seem very quick to react and make a not-so-subtle accusation.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
21 June 2008, 04:08 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
For what it's worth, I think the memo is legit because some of the phraseology is very familiar to me. I think bits and pieces of it are present in promotional material related to the hairspring.
Instead of an about-face could it be a reconciliatory article? I mean, in a way he's admitting he was wrong about the hairspring while Mr Dowling was right. Play nice now guys |
21 June 2008, 04:24 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Yeah, it sure is a good article!
Thanks for sharing, Lee!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
21 June 2008, 05:40 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Quote:
No harm meant.
__________________
member#3242 |
|
21 June 2008, 05:50 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Rommel
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 9,203
|
Thanks for posting, I enjoyed going through it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.