The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 January 2016, 04:44 PM   #1
shy06002
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 566
Thinking about getting my first AP

I've been toying with the idea of getting my first AP. I went to the boutique in Manhattan to try a couple on. To my surprise....the 41mm Royal Oak actually fit my wrists better than the 39mm one. I have pretty small wrists at 6.25 but I automatically assume the 39mm RO would fit me right away but boy was I wrong. The case and bracelet was very stiff and it kind of hung on the side of my wrists. The bracelet did not hug my wrists the way that I like. When I tried on the 41mm RO it actually fit a lot better. The bracelet was not as stiff and it actually hugged my wrists a lot better. Does anyone have the same experience when comparing the two different sizes? I'm looking to get a simple blue dial 15202 or 15300. Which do you guys prefer?
shy06002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2016, 05:01 PM   #2
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,637
Similar experience for me with the ROO 44 vs 42
The 44 sat on my wrist better
I think it's due to different angles of the lugs, with the 44 lugs coming off the case at an angle more perpendicular to the case
eonflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2016, 10:18 PM   #3
dr.ns23
"TRF" Member
 
dr.ns23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Somewhere
Watch: 15202
Posts: 436
I have your same wrist size and I have noticed the same thing when trying the 15400 (41 mm). The bracelet hug my wrist perfectly but the watch felt a bit big on my wrist (or was very present) but I loved it. I tried the 15202 (39 mm) twice: the first time I thought the same as you, the bracelet was very stiff and didn't hug my wrist properly; the second time I tried it the salesperson held it tight so it felt like it is hugging my wrist and the watch looked great on my wrist! Now I am truly confused, as previously I dismissed the 15202 because of the bracelet and wanted to purchase the 15400. But after the last time I tried the 15202 I changed my mind again and decided that 15202 is the one. I am travelling to Paris this week and will try both models again, I will also try to ask if they can properly size the 15202 bracelet so I can make my mind... Will keep you posted...
dr.ns23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2016, 11:34 PM   #4
Jfbhd4
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: St louis
Posts: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by shy06002 View Post
I've been toying with the idea of getting my first AP. I went to the boutique in Manhattan to try a couple on. To my surprise....the 41mm Royal Oak actually fit my wrists better than the 39mm one. I have pretty small wrists at 6.25 but I automatically assume the 39mm RO would fit me right away but boy was I wrong. The case and bracelet was very stiff and it kind of hung on the side of my wrists. The bracelet did not hug my wrists the way that I like. When I tried on the 41mm RO it actually fit a lot better. The bracelet was not as stiff and it actually hugged my wrists a lot better. Does anyone have the same experience when comparing the two different sizes? I'm looking to get a simple blue dial 15202 or 15300. Which do you guys prefer?

I had the same quandary. Went to NY boutique and looked at 15202 and 15400 blue.

15202 was a bit dressy for me so I went with the 41mm 400.

Doubt you saw the 300 as it is out of production.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jfbhd4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2016, 12:07 AM   #5
wach16
"TRF" Member
 
wach16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: NH
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,121
If you did try on a 15300 with the old "AP Style" deployant I can see that being the case. Before they moved to the current butterfly style, there was definitely an issue of the bracelet fitting comfortably on smaller wrists (myself included). Other members have switched the deployant around to make it fit better on a smaller wrist. Good luck with the decision!
wach16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2016, 12:22 AM   #6
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
Thinking about getting my first AP

If the 41mm fit you better I would suggest holding out to find a blue dial 15400. I know they can be hard to find. Last time I was in NYC the boutique didn't have that or a 15202. I called a few others and they were not in stock either. I ended up with a silver 15400 and I love it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2016, 02:28 AM   #7
shy06002
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeopardy View Post
I have your same wrist size and I have noticed the same thing when trying the 15400 (41 mm). The bracelet hug my wrist perfectly but the watch felt a bit big on my wrist (or was very present) but I loved it. I tried the 15202 (39 mm) twice: the first time I thought the same as you, the bracelet was very stiff and didn't hug my wrist properly; the second time I tried it the salesperson held it tight so it felt like it is hugging my wrist and the watch looked great on my wrist! Now I am truly confused, as previously I dismissed the 15202 because of the bracelet and wanted to purchase the 15400. But after the last time I tried the 15202 I changed my mind again and decided that 15202 is the one. I am travelling to Paris this week and will try both models again, I will also try to ask if they can properly size the 15202 bracelet so I can make my mind... Will keep you posted...
Let me know how it goes! My heart wants to go with the 15202 but if it doesn't fit properly then I can't pull the trigger. I was hoping that once all the links were sized it would fit better but part of me thinks that is wishful thinking.

What are the differences between the 15300/15400?
shy06002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2016, 03:11 AM   #8
Vipes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,913
IMO, you are better off with the 15300 than the 15202 for your wrist size. The 15202 doesn't bend as much at the lugs. Good luck!
Vipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2016, 03:55 AM   #9
eal15
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Everett
Location: GTA, Canada
Watch: Audemars Piguet 15
Posts: 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeopardy View Post
I have your same wrist size and I have noticed the same thing when trying the 15400 (41 mm). The bracelet hug my wrist perfectly but the watch felt a bit big on my wrist (or was very present) but I loved it. I tried the 15202 (39 mm) twice: the first time I thought the same as you, the bracelet was very stiff and didn't hug my wrist properly; the second time I tried it the salesperson held it tight so it felt like it is hugging my wrist and the watch looked great on my wrist! Now I am truly confused, as previously I dismissed the 15202 because of the bracelet and wanted to purchase the 15400. But after the last time I tried the 15202 I changed my mind again and decided that 15202 is the one. I am travelling to Paris this week and will try both models again, I will also try to ask if they can properly size the 15202 bracelet so I can make my mind... Will keep you posted...
Ah, I've had some many internal debates with myself! I'm glad someone else has these "what do I do moments" lol. Good luck, I love the blue dials! Seriously considering a ROC boutique edition with the blue dial.
eal15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2016, 04:16 AM   #10
shy06002
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 566
This is a hard decision because I know deep down I'll only be satisfied with the smaller 15202 so I don't want to "settle" with the 41mm just because it fits better.
shy06002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2016, 06:28 AM   #11
s14roller
"TRF" Member
 
s14roller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
Here is my blue 15400. I have also tried on the 15202 and love it for what it is. Love the history and the visual of that movement. However, the 15400 always felt more solid to me, and of course the 15202 was also more money (but not the deciding factor).

Name:  ImageUploadedByTapatalk1452544098.131565.jpg
Views: 471
Size:  114.7 KB


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
s14roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2016, 06:29 AM   #12
dr.ns23
"TRF" Member
 
dr.ns23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Somewhere
Watch: 15202
Posts: 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by shy06002 View Post
This is a hard decision because I know deep down I'll only be satisfied with the smaller 15202 so I don't want to "settle" with the 41mm just because it fits better.
Same here. Deep down I want the 15202! I am hoping if it gets properly sized the bracelet will look fine. Let's wait and see...
dr.ns23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2016, 06:31 AM   #13
dr.ns23
"TRF" Member
 
dr.ns23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Somewhere
Watch: 15202
Posts: 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by eal15 View Post
Ah, I've had some many internal debates with myself! I'm glad someone else has these "what do I do moments" lol. Good luck, I love the blue dials! Seriously considering a ROC boutique edition with the blue dial.
I always have this 'what do I do moments' when it comes to 15202 vs 15400!
dr.ns23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2016, 01:45 AM   #14
shy06002
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 566
I've been told that once you resize the links on the 15202 it will fit the wrist a lot better. I only wish I had the opportunity to try this out without buying the watch first
shy06002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2016, 08:57 AM   #15
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
You cannot go wrong with either 15202 or 15300. Given the 15300 is discontinued you might need to search little longer.
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2016, 03:29 AM   #16
Abdullasaif
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dubai
Watch: bipolar
Posts: 2,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by eonflux View Post
Similar experience for me with the ROO 44 vs 42
The 44 sat on my wrist better
I think it's due to different angles of the lugs, with the 44 lugs coming off the case at an angle more perpendicular to the case
Same here the 44mm felt much more balanced on my wrist compared to a SS and RG 42 didnt sit as well
Abdullasaif is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.