ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cjohns · 20 January 2016, 04:47 AM

Anyone have a 1162XX and a 162XX DJ? If so does the 1162XX wear a little bigger because of the larger lugs ? I had a 16200 that I gave to my son which he loves,,, just thought it looked a bit small on,, and I don't have big wrists.

Eric Chan · 20 January 2016, 05:49 AM

I had a 116231 and have a 16234. Owned both of them at the same time for a 4 year period. The 116231 did wear larger due to the larger lugs as you have stated. Overall, the size difference is minimal, but to the trained eye, the difference can be seen. Also, the solid centre links made the 116231 feel a little more "substantial".

WhatTheDeuce · 20 January 2016, 09:31 AM

The polished lugs also causes the 11623x to feel more substantial, at least to me...

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

WhatTheDeuce · 20 January 2016, 09:36 AM

Here is a side by side comparison. Not sure if it will help...

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

SCsailor · 20 January 2016, 11:01 AM

The 6 digit models definitely wear bigger. I've had both, but only let the 116233. The updated bracelet makes it feel a little more substantial too.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

20 January 2016, 04:47 AM	#1
cjohns "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Clark Location: Ramsey Minnesota Watch: GMT Master II Posts: 954	Datejust ?? Anyone have a 1162XX and a 162XX DJ? If so does the 1162XX wear a little bigger because of the larger lugs ? I had a 16200 that I gave to my son which he loves,,, just thought it looked a bit small on,, and I don't have big wrists. __________________ GMT Master II 126300 41 White stick smooth Explorer 39mm SOLD ,, 114060 SOLD NIB Sub ND SOLD,,Shouldn't have!!!Crap!

20 January 2016, 09:31 AM	#3
WhatTheDeuce "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Kyung Location: Anywhere? Watch: cha want... Posts: 4,488	The polished lugs also causes the 11623x to feel more substantial, at least to me... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk __________________ Instagram: @whatthedeuce_

20 January 2016, 09:36 AM	#4
WhatTheDeuce "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Kyung Location: Anywhere? Watch: cha want... Posts: 4,488	Here is a side by side comparison. Not sure if it will help... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk __________________ Instagram: @whatthedeuce_

20 January 2016, 05:49 AM	#2
Eric Chan "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Eric Chan Location: Vancouver, BC CAN Watch: Day-Date 118238 Posts: 8,798	I had a 116231 and have a 16234. Owned both of them at the same time for a 4 year period. The 116231 did wear larger due to the larger lugs as you have stated. Overall, the size difference is minimal, but to the trained eye, the difference can be seen. Also, the solid centre links made the 116231 feel a little more "substantial".

20 January 2016, 11:01 AM	#5
SCsailor "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: South Carolina Posts: 334	The 6 digit models definitely wear bigger. I've had both, but only let the 116233. The updated bracelet makes it feel a little more substantial too. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)