15300 vs 15400

[anothernewphone]

I made the trip into the City of Brotherly Love to try one some watches at the local AP AD. It was about a 45 minute trek, but I was excited to try on some Royal Oaks. My buddy that was with me was considering purchasing either a Navitimer B-01, or the Milgauss GV.

When we got there, they didn't have all of the watches listed as "in-stock" on their website, but they did have a 15300 for me to try on. I liked the fit of it, but it was definitely missing a few links - it fit my 6.75" wrist right off the bat. They didn't have any SS 15400s, but I did manage to convince the uninterested sales lady in letting me try on a 15400SR, the new two-tone RO from SIHH 2015. I didn't snag a pic of the 300 on my wrist, but I did get one of the 400 -



Overall, I think the 400 is too big for me, as the lugs had some clearance off my wrist. What would I be missing out on if I went with a 15300 over the 15400? Can anyone give me a pros and cons? I think this throws the 15202 into the mix now, and that worries my bank account

[hussaint]

How come the still have the 15300 in stock ?
If you can purchase the the 15202 go for it you will never regret.
Beside the size and few dial and clasp diff. there is nothing big diff. between 400 and 300.

[anothernewphone]

Originally Posted by hussaint

How come the still have the 15300 in stock ?

They carry pre-owned watches there as well. They had the 15300ST in a white dial, but I already have the Daytona in a white dial. Their site also listed a used 15202 white dial, but that was no where to be found.

[GB-man]

I agree the 15400, while doable does not convey the classic RO proportions on you.

If you go 15300, you forgo the iconic double hash at 12 o'clock...potential existing warranty...ability to buy bnib.

I would say you gain the ideal size for a RO...a better positioned date aperture.

It's a true toss up and if you can afford the 15202, it would be my choice

[Foxman2k]

How big is your wrist?

[ambardog]

pm man this rolexs

[Dolor Doc]

Looks fine on your wrist, but don't have any shots from the side. That being said, how often are you looking at the watch from the side?

The AP AD's I looked at didn't have any 15300 in stock to look at and I preferred the aesthetics of the 15400 over the 15202. That being said, the history and movement of the 202 are extraordinary.

If you get an opportunity, try to compare both side to side--it made my decision much easier.

[RHIII]

I think that the 15400 looks fine on your wrist as well --- but it's really something that I would do a side by side comparison on and see which one feels better on the wrist - to you.

Having said that -- I am a bigger fan of the 39mm models personally - so I tend to gravitate that direction. (The 41mm references are sharp -- I just prefer the classic 39mm)

I would 100% hold out for a 15202 if that reference is on your radar -- without a doubt.
It will NOT disappoint! 👍

Good luck!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[anothernewphone]

Thanks for the advice, guys!

Originally Posted by Foxman2k

How big is your wrist?

6'75" -- here's a similar shot with my Daytona for reference


I'm really digging the 15300, and I've yet to handle the Jumbo, but I'd really like the check that out. The problem I'm having is that the only dealer in the area, the one I just went to, treated me like an outcast while I was there. It seemed like I was really inconveniencing them with my presence.

Also, every time I see a Day-Date on someone's wrist, it really sways my mind back toward a 118238.

[descartes]

15300 is a killer and has it all- right size, presence, robust yet elegant, etc.

[K3vin]

Yeah I feel like the 15400 has the wrong proportions (I want to say 'too much dial'). I would say 15300 or 15202 all the way, preferably with the blue dial. I own a 15450st and also def recommend it :)

[subtona]

Fit would be my first criteria between the two.
15300 i.e. 39mm would be my choice looking at your pic.

As mentioned, the 15202 is quite nice too.

[Hairdude1]

Love the 15300. Maybe you need to look at picking up the 15202

[smeowly]

15300 is a good size. never liked the 15400

[lapince]

Do you really want a two tone would be my question, not for everyone

[jjnd08]

The 400 doesn't look bad on your wrist here. I know you mentioned you felt it was too big on IG, but if the lugs aren't hanging off your wrist on both sides simultaneously, you should be good - especially when it is properly fitted.

If you do go 300, my vote is white dial.

I prefer the 41mm over any of the other models. It's the perfect daily watch for me. Here's why I prefer it:

- more symmetrical dial with the double batons at the top, and a half of one at the 3 o'clock mark (I really don't like the "AP" at the 12 mark on the 300)
- colored date wheel really adds to the look
- better "dial to bezel" ratio
- 41mm makes it look sporty when it is worn with short sleeves, but it is still thin enough (and the integrated clasp helps - no bulging clasp like Rolex sports models) that it slides perfectly under a dress shirt cuff

[anothernewphone]

Originally Posted by lapince

Do you really want a two tone would be my question, not for everyone

If you see my original post, I am not interested in two-tone, it's just the only 15400 that they had in stock. Their site advertised both the white and black dial 15400s in stock, but there were none to found when I got there.

Originally Posted by jjnd08

The 400 doesn't look bad on your wrist here. I know you mentioned you felt it was too big on IG, but if the lugs aren't hanging off your wrist on both sides simultaneously, you should be good - especially when it is properly fitted.

If you do go 300, my vote is white dial.

I prefer the 41mm over any of the other models. It's the perfect daily watch for me. Here's why I prefer it:

- more symmetrical dial with the double batons at the top, and a half of one at the 3 o'clock mark (I really don't like the "AP" at the 12 mark on the 300)
- colored date wheel really adds to the look
- better "dial to bezel" ratio
- 41mm makes it look sporty when it is worn with short sleeves, but it is still thin enough (and the integrated clasp helps - no bulging clasp like Rolex sports models) that it slides perfectly under a dress shirt cuff

All very good points. I love the white dial on the Royal Oak, but since I already have the white Daytona, I wanted to have something to switch things up a bit.

[samn]

I like the proportions and fit of the 15300 better. I'd vote for that or a 15202 if you are ok spending a bit more.

[mjclark32]

15300 for me. I actually put a deposit down on the white dial 15300 you tried on (if you were at Govberg's) I took it back due to no box, papers, price and not being able to try on a 15400. I finally tried one on at the Nyc boutique and found the 300 fit me better (7" wrist).

[jrs146]

Originally Posted by jjnd08

41mm makes it look sporty when it is worn with short sleeves, but it is still thin enough (and the integrated clasp helps - no bulging clasp like Rolex sports models) that it slides perfectly under a dress shirt cuff

YES!
The 15400 is surprisingly thin. The Jumbo gets all the credit for its size, but the 15400 is not that much thicker. The clasp on the 15400 is a thing of beauty. It really is a great sport/dress watch that will be a go-to for any occasion.

[jjnd08]

Originally Posted by jrs146

YES!
The 15400 is surprisingly thin. The Jumbo gets all the credit for its size, but the 15400 is not that much thicker. The clasp on the 15400 is a thing of beauty. It really is a great sport/dress watch that will be a go-to for any occasion.

[anothernewphone]

Originally Posted by mjclark32

15300 for me. I actually put a deposit down on the white dial 15300 you tried on (if you were at Govberg's) I took it back due to no box, papers, price and not being able to try on a 15400. I finally tried one on at the Nyc boutique and found the 300 fit me better (7" wrist).

Yep, that must have been same 15300 at Govberg! I'll be making the trip to NYC for a tattoo appointment, and I might have to make a pitstop at the boutique!

[Foxman2k]

Originally Posted by anothernewphone

Thanks for the advice, guys!







6'75" -- here's a similar shot with my Daytona for reference





I'm really digging the 15300, and I've yet to handle the Jumbo, but I'd really like the check that out. The problem I'm having is that the only dealer in the area, the one I just went to, treated me like an outcast while I was there. It seemed like I was really inconveniencing them with my presence.



Also, every time I see a Day-Date on someone's wrist, it really sways my mind back toward a 118238.

I have the 15400 and love it. Personally prefer the bigger dial.

Also to note that the white dial on the 15400 is more "silvery" than the 15300

[AK797]

Originally Posted by jjnd08

The 400 doesn't look bad on your wrist here. I know you mentioned you felt it was too big on IG, but if the lugs aren't hanging off your wrist on both sides simultaneously, you should be good - especially when it is properly fitted.

If you do go 300, my vote is white dial.

I prefer the 41mm over any of the other models. It's the perfect daily watch for me. Here's why I prefer it:

- more symmetrical dial with the double batons at the top, and a half of one at the 3 o'clock mark (I really don't like the "AP" at the 12 mark on the 300)
- colored date wheel really adds to the look
- better "dial to bezel" ratio
- 41mm makes it look sporty when it is worn with short sleeves, but it is still thin enough (and the integrated clasp helps - no bulging clasp like Rolex sports models) that it slides perfectly under a dress shirt cuff

I prefer the size and balance of the 300 but would probably prefer not to have the big AP at 12. Also the silver dial is more interesting than the flat white on the 300. Both have merits. Overall I'd go for a black 300.