The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 March 2016, 10:51 AM   #1
Al1969
2024 Pledge Member
 
Al1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,640
Blnr for 233 ?

Hi everyone,
The more I see the 233, the more I want to own in. Just wondering what are everyone's thoughts on a possible trade. I'd rather not have the additional expense of adding another piece, so I have been considering trading my BLNR towards/for a 233. So I figure I'd post and get suggestions from fellow members.

Thanks,
__________________
WG SUB-116719
GMT MASTER II 126719
Al1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 10:57 AM   #2
dualcarb
"TRF" Member
 
dualcarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: HK/Malaysia
Watch: Lover
Posts: 1,223
I wouldn't trade a BLNR for a 233
dualcarb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 11:29 AM   #3
Panerai Freak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: US
Posts: 42
It all depends on what you're after; if it's investment, then I'd keep the BLNR. If it's for enjoyment and you have a way to do a straight trade (or to your advantage), then I would definitely go for the 233.

The PAM 233 is one of my favorite watches and it keeps growing on me the longer I own it.

Personally, I would get rid of the 111 and add a little money to get a 233.
Panerai Freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 11:33 AM   #4
Al1969
2024 Pledge Member
 
Al1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panerai Freak View Post
It all depends on what you're after; if it's investment, then I'd keep the BLNR. If it's for enjoyment and you have a way to do a straight trade (or to your advantage), then I would definitely go for the 233.

The PAM 233 is one of my favorite watches and it keeps growing on me the longer I own it.

Personally, I would get rid of the 111 and add a little money to get a 233.
Thanks for th suggestion on the 111. I have considered that as well. I think right now from my small collection, I'd consider the 111 and/or BLNR for a potential trade towards the 233. Any idea what year they stopped the dot dial?
__________________
WG SUB-116719
GMT MASTER II 126719
Al1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 11:54 AM   #5
Panerai Freak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: US
Posts: 42
The 233 dot ran from series I through K (I 1,500 units, J 1,000 units, K 2,000 units). The AM/PM started with the L series (1,000 units) in 2010.
Panerai Freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 11:56 AM   #6
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
I would trade for the 233 it's awesome I'm not a big fan of the Blnr.
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 11:59 AM   #7
Rogdogg
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Rogdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
I think the 233 is a great watch but I much prefer the BLNR so that's what I have. However, it sounds like you're preferring the 233 so go for it. If you prefer the 233 over the BLNR but you keep the BLNR then I think the only reason you would do that is for the financial side of things, value retention of the BLNR and that's the wrong way to look at it if you ask me.
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Rogdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 12:11 PM   #8
Pattyb69
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CT
Watch: BLNR|LVC|PAM 911
Posts: 1,085
I was in your position about a year ago. I owned an 114060 and a BLNR at the time and even though I could justify owning both in the same collection, I found the wearing experience to be similar.

I ended up trading my BLNR for a 233 and even though I miss the BLNR I don't regret the decision. I'd rather have one Rolex sports model and one Panerai instead of two Rolex sport models. I'll add the BLNR again down the road.

I mean look how pretty she is





Pattyb69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 12:15 PM   #9
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
I wouldn't do it ... Keep the BLNR !!!
It's a timeless beauty ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 12:20 PM   #10
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,296
Trade away. BLNR is nice, but 233 > BLNR.

Edit: I just saw you'd consider trading the 111 instead of the BLNR.... I think I'd do that, instead, if I had the cash to make up the difference. I wouldn't "need" the 111 with the 233 in the stable.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 12:33 PM   #11
Al1969
2024 Pledge Member
 
Al1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,640
Thanks for all the advice. Still gotta decide which direction to go.
__________________
WG SUB-116719
GMT MASTER II 126719
Al1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 01:22 PM   #12
Panerai Freak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: US
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pattyb69 View Post
I was in your position about a year ago. I owned an 114060 and a BLNR at the time and even though I could justify owning both in the same collection, I found the wearing experience to be similar.

I ended up trading my BLNR for a 233 and even though I miss the BLNR I don't regret the decision. I'd rather have one Rolex sports model and one Panerai instead of two Rolex sport models. I'll add the BLNR again down the road.

I mean look how pretty she is
I concur!

Amazing pictures, BTW! That 233 must be proud of you!
Panerai Freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 05:57 PM   #13
Watcheroo
2024 Pledge Member
 
Watcheroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,927
Well, neither watch is rare and both can be added when you want/can. I got rid of my hulk (that I had owned and enjoyed for 4 years) to fund the 233. I can't be more satisfied with the 233 and I'm sure a Rolex will find its way back to me in the future!

Go with what makes you smile.
Watcheroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 08:55 PM   #14
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Imho the 233 is the more interesting watch. In a straight choice, I would pick the 233 over the BLNR.
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2016, 10:33 PM   #15
Friedl41
"TRF" Member
 
Friedl41's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: SLF41
Location: Spain
Watch: Changes
Posts: 1,053
233
__________________
Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m
SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980)
GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570
PP 5065a
Friedl41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2016, 12:40 AM   #16
tjjma
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 237
Unfortunately the Panerai bug is real. Once you set your eyes on a model, it's hard to let go. After I got my first Panerai, I found that I started to wear my Rolex models less and less. So I say trade the BLNR for the 233.

I would sell my LVc to free up some funds after purchasing two Panerais in the past month but unfortunately the LVc has some sentimental value to me.
tjjma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2016, 05:30 AM   #17
Pattyb69
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CT
Watch: BLNR|LVC|PAM 911
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panerai Freak View Post
I concur!

Amazing pictures, BTW! That 233 must be proud of you!
Thanks bud!
Pattyb69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2016, 06:23 AM   #18
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN
"TRF" Member
 
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: KAAN
Location: ISTANBUL
Watch: Explorer-PAM233
Posts: 1,648
As a pam321 and hulk owner I can clearly say that let the blnr go.. Pam233 is the most sexy watch ever seen...
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2016, 06:28 AM   #19
TonyD
2024 Pledge Member
 
TonyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Boston North
Watch: Meteorite Daytona
Posts: 1,471
Given the rest of your collection I would not hesitate to swap them. I love my 233 and would recommend it to anyone. Best of luck to you!
__________________
Pepsi GMT/SD43/DSSD Blue/ DJ41 TT Rose Diamond Dial/ Daytona Meteorite/ SS Sky Dweller White Dial/ IWC Bronze Big Pilot/ Aquanautic Super King / Omega Ploprof 1200 / Graham Scarab Diver
TonyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2016, 03:12 PM   #20
jagwap
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
I have the GMTIIc LN and the 233 dot.

The GMTIIC may get more wrist time, due to size and flexibility, but the 233 is easily the favourite. Just pick it up out of the safe at the weekend and it's still ticking from the last one.
jagwap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2016, 10:26 PM   #21
Smartyjones18
"TRF" Member
 
Smartyjones18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 769
Go for it, no regret for me even though the way i acquired my 233 was quite rediculers. I had listed my Rolex 16570 for sale and this gentleman asked whether would i accept trade with his 233, i thought whats 233 as i havent owned any pam at that time yet, but the moment i saw and put on my wrist, i knew i wont remove it. Its still one of my favorite watches to wear daily.

Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk
Smartyjones18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2016, 06:23 AM   #22
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartyjones18 View Post
Go for it, no regret for me even though the way i acquired my 233 was quite rediculers. I had listed my Rolex 16570 for sale and this gentleman asked whether would i accept trade with his 233, i thought whats 233 as i havent owned any pam at that time yet, but the moment i saw and put on my wrist, i knew i wont remove it. Its still one of my favorite watches to wear daily.

Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk


Wow, amazing/insane deal for you!!
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2016, 08:25 AM   #23
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
I'd trade for the 233
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2016, 09:59 AM   #24
doc.kool
"TRF" Member
 
doc.kool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 610
I would do it. The BLNR is awesome but the 233 is such a great watch. Great looking watch with very useful functions. You can really change the look of the watch with the rapid strap change. I've had mine for almost 9 years now. Good luck. Great news is that you will have a great watch either way

doc.kool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2016, 10:22 AM   #25
mikko333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Lincolnshire
Watch: 1601 116520 BLNR
Posts: 7
Stick with the blnr it's absolutely stunning.
mikko333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2016, 10:47 AM   #26
One Ping Only
"TRF" Member
 
One Ping Only's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Ken
Location: WI
Watch: several
Posts: 1,639
I have had both, still have the BLNR. I'd say trade the 111.
__________________
I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one.
One Ping Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2016, 10:08 PM   #27
Jcgul
"TRF" Member
 
Jcgul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NYC
Posts: 50
233 all day... its just perfection. Nothing else to be said. After wearing my 233, 40mm rolex's just seem insignificant. Especially on the wrist
Jcgul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2016, 12:31 AM   #28
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
233 is my favorite PAM, so I would
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2016, 01:55 AM   #29
lmcgbaj
"TRF" Member
 
lmcgbaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc.kool View Post
Great picture. 233 looks like a monster in comparison.

Looks great but too large for my comfort.

BLNR is just the perfect size for me.
lmcgbaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2016, 07:13 AM   #30
Al1969
2024 Pledge Member
 
Al1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,640
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc.kool View Post
I would do it. The BLNR is awesome but the 233 is such a great watch. Great looking watch with very useful functions. You can really change the look of the watch with the rapid strap change. I've had mine for almost 9 years now. Good luck. Great news is that you will have a great watch either way

Not making it easy with this pic. I'm gonna think long and hard bout the flip. Any idea what's the latest series on the 233?
Thanks

Thanks
__________________
WG SUB-116719
GMT MASTER II 126719
Al1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.