ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 July 2008, 06:17 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
DSSD vs. SD
From another forum. The first side by side I've seen, POST CREDIT MINER
http://watchtalkforums.proboards26.c...ay&thread=7496 |
18 July 2008, 06:19 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Thank you, thank you, thank you...I've been waiting for this shot. I'm in heaven!!! Now if I could just get my hands on one in the flesh my life would be a lot better.
|
18 July 2008, 06:25 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
Hmmm. I felt a cold chill when I saw those pix. Could be out of my size league.
__________________
E |
18 July 2008, 06:26 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
|
I like the side on wrist shots, but the face on shots, the SDDS looks ugly
__________________
Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it |
18 July 2008, 06:35 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Posts: 434
|
I think I'd have to start pumping up for that to look anywhere near acceptable on my wrist!
|
18 July 2008, 06:44 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
IMHO look too BIG for me. Look more BIG & THICK than Pannie to me. Even I know the size only 43mm. But look more BIG.
Thanks Mike, Thanks Miner... |
18 July 2008, 06:59 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Actually, to me it seems smaller than I thought it would look...well at least from the side by side overhead view when on the wrist. No doubt it looks a lot thicker from the side shots, but the overview doesn't seem that much bigger than the SD (6th picture). I'm sure in person it looks a lot bigger.
|
18 July 2008, 07:03 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
I also fear (again from the 6th picture) that the dial is the exact same size as the SD - too bad if that's the case...I was really hoping for a slightly larger dial face. Anybody know for sure about the dial diameter? I think it might be true they are the same due to that damn 'ring lock system' BS.
And what about the date window...do you think that's the same size too? Again, I was hoping for a slightly larger date window. Probably if the dial is the same size, the date window is too. Too bad. Oh well, I still think I might have to give one a nice new home someday. |
18 July 2008, 07:23 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
I have had a DSSD on my small wrist and it is huge , Check the side on shots , it seems double the thickness of a SD when you are wearing it .
|
18 July 2008, 07:28 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
|
18 July 2008, 07:34 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
|
18 July 2008, 07:39 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
|
18 July 2008, 07:45 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
|
18 July 2008, 07:56 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
|
18 July 2008, 08:12 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: GB
Posts: 220
|
I love this watch even if it is like me...a bit thick.
|
18 July 2008, 08:23 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Wonderful, thanks for this. Better sell the YM to finance the DSSD
My heart is racing again
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org Last edited by Tony-GB; 18 July 2008 at 08:25 PM.. Reason: / |
18 July 2008, 08:25 PM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
|
18 July 2008, 08:37 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
|
Good find a thanks for posting. The DSSD is definitely massive
Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau |
18 July 2008, 08:48 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mililani, Oahu
Posts: 1,307
|
Huge!!!
|
18 July 2008, 09:57 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: USA
Watch: the skies
Posts: 1,250
|
Any interest I had in wearing that watch just vanished after seeing those pics. The SD has balance, but nothing about the DSSD does. The SD has a great look without being downright obvious, but that is all the DSSD is about, especially with the "Hey, look at me!" inscriptions all over it.
Not the first Rolex that screams overcompensating, but definitely the one that any others will be measured against. |
18 July 2008, 10:54 PM | #21 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
That's a massive watch
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
18 July 2008, 10:55 PM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: Perth Australia
Watch: LV
Posts: 201
|
I have decided after checking out the DSSD, it is not for me. Nice looking watch but to big for my 7" wrist.
As stated by Miner the bracelet is great with some very impressive improvements. When the new sub with the ceramic bezel and no polished centre links arrives that will do me |
18 July 2008, 11:45 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,294
|
Its big and heavy and at the time I thought it was larger than a Panerai. Not so sure now....
Wish I took the Pam along as well for a side by side. The Pam plus strap weighs 136g on my kitchen scales vs 145g for the sd. The DSSD weighs in at over 220g so its not so much the size but the weight. |
18 July 2008, 11:54 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 266
|
Size wise, I don't think it looks too big -- I just wish that they had left the excessive ring lock labeling off! Hopefully it doesn't stand out in the flesh as much as it does in photos...
__________________
Rolex: 16600 | 116400 V Panerai: Fiddy | 232 Sinn : U1 |
19 July 2008, 12:16 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Danny
Location: Houston
Watch: TT Sub/Slate Serti
Posts: 159
|
My uncle is about to buy a YG Yacht-Master II. Now that watch is bigger than I thought. The DSSD looks about the same size. I'll post some wrist shots after he picks it up in a few days.
|
19 July 2008, 12:24 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
The DSSD is just plain too big, IMHO. After seeing the comparisons, the SD is still a classic with the right size etc.
If some folks are already 'complaining' that the 16600 is tall and top heavy, then the DSSD will be many times that. A watch that big should be IMHO made of Titanium, but I know, I know, most folks want heft I'm sticking with my Chrono Avenger for size, but half the weight.
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
19 July 2008, 12:31 AM | #27 |
-
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Erwin
Location: Hollywood, Ca
Watch: SD
Posts: 1,032
|
Wow, that DSSD is a real monster!
__________________
Your watch silently speaks about your character! sd/datejust/tudor/a couple of vintage omegas/tissotMB Meisterstuck Bordeaux pen/MB Noblesse Oblige/Starwalker/MB Classique Fountain pen/MB no 149 |
19 July 2008, 01:35 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 739
|
Super Giant!
|
19 July 2008, 01:36 AM | #29 |
Retired
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern AZ, USA
Posts: 87
|
Way too big for my sissy wrist!
The text on the rehaut is over the top, imo, also. Text on the rehaut is fine if the angle of the rehaut wrt the dial is steeper like on my Exp II M/3386. The text is not seen unless you make an effort to see it by looking at a very oblique angle. To me, that is rehaut text done in the proper manner. The DSSD's text is an advert, pure and simple! Appreciate the link, though, as it helps solidify my thinking and makes me realize how much I need the SD! |
19 July 2008, 03:12 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,460
|
Mike
Thank you for the photos, Its looks like "Little and Large" or "Father and Son" That is one HUGE watch. Looking at the comparison photos. Its going to look ridiculously to big on my wrist.
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.