ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2016, 03:02 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Oakland
Posts: 12
|
One Watch Explorer II 16570 or GMT BLNR
Just started looking at purchasing my first serious watch and I have been going back and forth at the local AD. Looking for a quality sport watch that I can enjoy for years and hand down to my new son. The BLNR has caught my eye but I'm not a flashy person and the numbering on the ceramic bezel look busy and the pcl's look to flashy. The new explorer II seems close but is too big for my wrist. Thought about the sub but last week but I sat down at a meeting and the other four poeple on the table were sporting one. Now I'm thinking the 16570 would be the perfect fit but need to see one in the wild. Of what's at the AD the BLNR seems the best option. Thoughts?
|
17 March 2016, 05:37 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Orlando
Watch: AP/R O L E X
Posts: 187
|
BLNR without a doubt
|
17 March 2016, 05:43 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
|
17 March 2016, 05:51 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
BLNR but get the bracelet brushed?
|
17 March 2016, 06:05 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 29,770
|
Another vote for BLNR.
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day" TRF #139960 |
17 March 2016, 06:11 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Josh
Location: Camden SC
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 214
|
I say Exp II Polar
|
17 March 2016, 11:06 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Cranford
Posts: 704
|
BLNR without question if you are going for only one watch. If you don't like the ceramic bezel or pcl's, look at the older GMT II. That's much more comparable to the 5 digit explorer II. Don't limit yourself to what's at the AD, there is a whole universe of watches out there, check the for sale listings.
|
17 March 2016, 11:11 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canada
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,019
|
Is this a real question?
BLNR by a mile. Actually the one that you like and not the one we suggest.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master IIc 116710BLNR |
17 March 2016, 11:16 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 2,308
|
BLNR no brainer!
|
17 March 2016, 11:21 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
BLNR for sure
|
17 March 2016, 11:24 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
Exp
__________________
|
17 March 2016, 11:44 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: Maine
Watch: Explorer II 16570
Posts: 1,396
|
Agree that the BLNR is a little too flashy, especially the PCLs. Go with the Explorer II 16570, as long as you don't mind a few dings and dents in the steel bezel along the way.
|
17 March 2016, 11:45 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Nicholas
Location: NYC
Watch: 116520
Posts: 855
|
|
17 March 2016, 11:48 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 876
|
Explorer II if you want to fly under the radar. BLNR if you want (almost) everyone to know that you are wearing a Rolex.
|
17 March 2016, 11:50 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: NYC
Watch: AP,Rolex,UN,Pam
Posts: 595
|
Blnr
|
17 March 2016, 11:53 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: CA
Watch: Bluesy
Posts: 382
|
Both are nice watches, I was considering the same when I got my first Rolex. I went with BLNR just thought it covered all the options nicely, from daily to slightly dressy it works.
|
17 March 2016, 11:55 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
Buying an explorer 2 now for traveling.....blnr already acquired....only one? Blnr for sure. Versatility and flat out better looking watch.
|
17 March 2016, 12:00 PM | #18 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
16570 over the BLNR for me, either colour. In fact you should be able to get both of these for the price of a BLNR if you shop around.
|
17 March 2016, 12:03 PM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5712
Posts: 2,621
|
Blnr all day. And that's coming from a 16570 fan. But you can but a nice polar in the 40mm for a few thousand less, if that is any consideration
|
17 March 2016, 12:10 PM | #20 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: Brett
Location: Florida
Watch: 5205R
Posts: 5,160
|
Quote:
OP I own both. I just can't stop wearing the BLNR. It's just a beautiful watch. When you can get both but the BLNR takes first. IMHO.
__________________
Morality does not derive from consensus. It only comes from one place. Pride goes before destruction, and haughtiness before a fall. Often times unbelief is disguised as wisdom Instagram - patton250 |
|
17 March 2016, 12:11 PM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
What's a BLNR? Go for the DaytonaC.
|
17 March 2016, 12:13 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 513
|
BLNR, and I even have an Exp2.
|
17 March 2016, 12:29 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Oakland
Posts: 12
|
Thank you for all of the great feedback!!! so glad I joined this community. As a new person potentially looking at a discontinued watch like the 16570, where would you suggest I look? Good online reputable spots or dealers? Cheers!
|
17 March 2016, 01:44 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 2,308
|
|
17 March 2016, 01:45 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
If you don't like PCLs then why spend double the $$$$?????? Sounds like you want the ExpII but I like the GMT personally.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 March 2016, 01:51 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 414
|
|
17 March 2016, 01:58 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 125
|
Love my Polar 16570. Not very common in the wild and looks very inconspicuous. I'd go for that if you don't want flashy.
|
17 March 2016, 02:03 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 343
|
Only one? What about a polar and a pre-ceramic coke? You can get them both for close to the price of a blnr.
|
17 March 2016, 02:06 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
|
You want the explorer. Get the explorer. Don't let the fanfare here on the BLNR sway you. It's a great watch but I think the PCL's and the larger case will be more showy than you want. The 16570 is every bit as much a Rolex as the BLNR. Get what you like, not what you think you should like.
|
17 March 2016, 02:11 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 12,000+ Lakes!
Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR
Posts: 840
|
BLNR, big surprise, right?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.