ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

uri40 · 23 March 2016, 03:24 PM

I already own the 15400 (silver dial) and also like the look of the RO diver. If you owned the 15400 would you even consider the RO diver?

benlee · 23 March 2016, 03:39 PM

Why not? They are rather different watches and compliment each other well.

csquared317 · 23 March 2016, 04:02 PM

I just got a 15400, and to be honest, I am starting to look at the diver, but the ceramic one though.

eonflux · 23 March 2016, 05:02 PM

A 15400 and a Diver would make a great pair!
Especially with a white 15400 on a bracelet and a black dial Diver on a black rubber strap

Rachaphon · 23 March 2016, 05:13 PM

I would, totally different watch!

PJ S · 23 March 2016, 06:34 PM

Absolutely.

JD521 · 23 March 2016, 09:40 PM

Definitely different enough to own both.

Mainewatchman · 23 March 2016, 09:59 PM

I am!

masterserg · 23 March 2016, 10:07 PM

Yes. I had that pair at one point. It is awesome.

csi-n · 23 March 2016, 10:30 PM

I would, why not? They are quite different.

Sam

Abdullasaif · 23 March 2016, 10:34 PM

Ofc they're pretty different watches

GB-man · 23 March 2016, 10:55 PM

Yeah I see no reason not to.

Tan · 23 March 2016, 11:18 PM

From a complimentary standpoint, I see no reason not to. Personally though, the Diver doesn't really appeal to me so I would look to other watches.

gummy · 23 March 2016, 11:37 PM

Absolutely!

One a little more Dressy...

One a little more Casual...

Perfect AP Duo

sirish19 · 24 March 2016, 12:18 AM

Agree with everyone else that they are different enough to make a good combo.

Hairdude1 · 24 March 2016, 12:22 AM

Sure!

jjnd08 · 24 March 2016, 01:30 AM

Absolutely; I'd love to get an AP Diver to pair with my 15400.

cpcowy · 24 March 2016, 02:59 AM

Absolutely. I actually bought a silver 15400 to compliment my Diver and they are a great pair.

Al1969 · 24 March 2016, 06:27 AM

Oh no, please don't! I've been considering the diver on and off to go with my silver dial 15400.

jrs146 · 24 March 2016, 07:21 AM

I've almost purchased the diver on a few occasions to pair with my 15400. I got tripped up debating between the new version and the older. Still not sure which to get

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lordofrolex · 24 March 2016, 09:36 AM

I personally wouldn't. I would rather go with a ROO so you can get diversity with a chrono.

uri40 · 24 March 2016, 03:24 PM

Thanks for everyones input. I should have mentioned I already have PP 5167 and a IWC ingeniur amg (ceramic).

jolimont · 24 March 2016, 10:55 PM

like everyone else says, they are 2 very different watches

ie. one which genta created, and one he hated

uri40 · 25 March 2016, 06:52 AM

Which one did he hate?

AK797 · 25 March 2016, 07:00 AM

Yes if you want to stay wth AP.

jolimont · 25 March 2016, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uri40

Which one did he hate?

the first roo

RHIII · 25 March 2016, 12:15 PM

Absolutely -- they are two completely different references...

Royalex · 26 March 2016, 09:05 PM

I would go for offshore or 15202

PJ S · 26 March 2016, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royalex

I would go for offshore or 15202

The diver is an Offshore model, and getting a 202 when you already have the 400 makes no sense whatsoever.

uri40 · 27 March 2016, 07:21 AM

How robust and reliable is the movement on the ROO diver? I've heard stories with AP movement problems.

23 March 2016, 03:24 PM	#1
uri40 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Jose, CA Watch: AP Royal Oak Posts: 105	Would you consider a RO diver if you already own the 15400 I already own the 15400 (silver dial) and also like the look of the RO diver. If you owned the 15400 would you even consider the RO diver?

23 March 2016, 10:07 PM	#9
masterserg "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Serg Location: US of A Watch: AP Posts: 7,437	Yes. I had that pair at one point. It is awesome. __________________ How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????

24 March 2016, 12:18 AM	#15
sirish19 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Real Name: Stephen Location: Tokyo Watch: PP-VC-AP Posts: 1,003	Agree with everyone else that they are different enough to make a good combo. __________________

24 March 2016, 12:22 AM	#16
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Sure! __________________ Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018

24 March 2016, 01:30 AM	#17
jjnd08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 8,615	Absolutely; I'd love to get an AP Diver to pair with my 15400. __________________ ---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches

23 March 2016, 03:39 PM	#2
benlee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Ben Location: SIN & JKT Watch: Rolex, AP, PP Posts: 9,874	Why not? They are rather different watches and compliment each other well.

23 March 2016, 04:02 PM	#3
csquared317 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: HK Posts: 114	I just got a 15400, and to be honest, I am starting to look at the diver, but the ceramic one though.

23 March 2016, 05:02 PM	#4
eonflux "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SNA Posts: 3,637	A 15400 and a Diver would make a great pair! Especially with a white 15400 on a bracelet and a black dial Diver on a black rubber strap

23 March 2016, 05:13 PM	#5
Rachaphon "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Ben Location: Bangkok, Thailand Watch: Rolex Daytona Posts: 306	I would, totally different watch!

23 March 2016, 06:34 PM	#6
PJ S Banned Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: UK Posts: 3,990	Absolutely.

23 March 2016, 09:40 PM	#7
JD521 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: John Location: The Bay Posts: 1,055	Definitely different enough to own both.

23 March 2016, 09:59 PM	#8
Mainewatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Real Name: Jason Location: Maine Watch: AP & Patek Posts: 462	I am!

23 March 2016, 10:30 PM	#10
csi-n "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Sam Location: Arkansas Posts: 1,042	I would, why not? They are quite different. Sam

23 March 2016, 10:34 PM	#11
Abdullasaif "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Dubai Watch: bipolar Posts: 2,854	Ofc they're pretty different watches

23 March 2016, 10:55 PM	#12
GB-man 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 37,355	Yeah I see no reason not to.

23 March 2016, 11:18 PM	#13
Tan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Canada Watch: PP 5320G Posts: 1,259	From a complimentary standpoint, I see no reason not to. Personally though, the Diver doesn't really appeal to me so I would look to other watches.

23 March 2016, 11:37 PM	#14
gummy 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Thomas Location: Midwest USA Watch: AP PP Rolex Posts: 3,348	Absolutely! One a little more Dressy... One a little more Casual... Perfect AP Duo

24 March 2016, 02:59 AM	#18
cpcowy "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: Northern Virginia Posts: 44	Absolutely. I actually bought a silver 15400 to compliment my Diver and they are a great pair.

24 March 2016, 06:27 AM	#19
Al1969 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 6,640	Oh no, please don't! I've been considering the diver on and off to go with my silver dial 15400. __________________ WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719

24 March 2016, 07:21 AM	#20
jrs146 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Josh Location: Lost in time Watch: Me Nae Nae Posts: 9,823	I've almost purchased the diver on a few occasions to pair with my 15400. I got tripped up debating between the new version and the older. Still not sure which to get Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ "Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter

24 March 2016, 09:36 AM	#21
Lordofrolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Brandon Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: Yes Please! Posts: 6,691	I personally wouldn't. I would rather go with a ROO so you can get diversity with a chrono. __________________ Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich

24 March 2016, 03:24 PM	#22
uri40 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Jose, CA Watch: AP Royal Oak Posts: 105	Thanks for everyones input. I should have mentioned I already have PP 5167 and a IWC ingeniur amg (ceramic).

24 March 2016, 10:55 PM	#23
jolimont "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Will Location: land of oz Watch: sundial Posts: 2,219	like everyone else says, they are 2 very different watches ie. one which genta created, and one he hated

25 March 2016, 06:52 AM	#24
uri40 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Jose, CA Watch: AP Royal Oak Posts: 105	Which one did he hate?

25 March 2016, 07:00 AM	#25
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	Yes if you want to stay wth AP.

25 March 2016, 12:15 PM	#27
RHIII Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Real Name: Roger Location: ... Watch: AP/Rolex/PP Posts: 6,309	Absolutely -- they are two completely different references...

26 March 2016, 09:05 PM	#28
Royalex "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Bangkok Posts: 762	I would go for offshore or 15202

27 March 2016, 07:21 AM	#30
uri40 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Jose, CA Watch: AP Royal Oak Posts: 105	How robust and reliable is the movement on the ROO diver? I've heard stories with AP movement problems.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)