The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 May 2016, 03:33 PM   #1
Danny83
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Danny83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,312
TRF what do you guys think about this proposed law?

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/articl...aw-7943381.php
Danny83 is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 04:14 PM   #2
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
A humane option - in such a situation a citizen shouldn't need a badge to exercise good judgement to save a helpless animal. Of course, this form of "Good Samaritan" work is fraught with pitfalls if it is gamed by thieves...
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 04:17 PM   #3
Israguard
"TRF" Member
 
Israguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Montreal
Posts: 859
what an amazing law. Should be law everywhere
Israguard is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 04:26 PM   #4
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
The law should also specify that the owners get civil service and are fined.
Cru Jones is online now  
Old 25 May 2016, 04:45 PM   #5
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Nice idea, but allowing citizens to damage property is ripe for abuse of the "good faith" requirement.

Call 911, cops will be there in 10 minutes to extract the pooch.
Abdullah71601 is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 07:22 PM   #6
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abdullah71601 View Post
Nice idea, but allowing citizens to damage property is ripe for abuse of the "good faith" requirement.



Call 911, cops will be there in 10 minutes to extract the pooch.


I tend to agree. You'll have people exercising this law just because. I can imagine a fight breaking out as a result as well, when the owner returns.

I always leave my car running when my boxer is with me unless it's a perfect 60 degrees and I'm say grabbing a coffee then I'll roll down all the windows 1/4.
__________________
GB-man is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 07:34 PM   #7
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
Great law. Law or no law I think most of us will help a distressed animal.
Gaijin is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 08:25 PM   #8
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
It's a law over here.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 08:32 PM   #9
jmiicustomz
"TRF" Member
 
jmiicustomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abdullah71601 View Post
Nice idea, but allowing citizens to damage property is ripe for abuse of the "good faith" requirement.

Call 911, cops will be there in 10 minutes to extract the pooch.
Cops in 10 minutes? Maybe in a metro area but where I live or many of the places I have lived, an hour to the nearest walmart or more. I called 911 about 2 years ago as I saw a dog on the side of the rd that had been hit. I knew it wouldn't make it but wanted the owners to be able to say goodbye if we could find them. Took the officer a bit over 30 minutes to respond and the dog passed in my arms during that time. Now I put the poor things out of their misery so they don't suffer until they leave this earth.
jmiicustomz is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 08:53 PM   #10
Rootbeer
"TRF" Member
 
Rootbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: USA
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 534
I kinda think it is the sort of thing you should call 911 for and then they should be advising from there. If it was a child that was trapped then of course and to hell with the consequences. If it was a big dog that might cut itself jumping over broken glass or injure me, my family or a bystander - or just run off never to be seen again it becomes a different proposition.
Rootbeer is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 09:05 PM   #11
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
I tend to agree. You'll have people exercising this law just because. I can imagine a fight breaking out as a result as well, when the owner returns.

I always leave my car running when my boxer is with me unless it's a perfect 60 degrees and I'm say grabbing a coffee then I'll roll down all the windows 1/4.
I can see a gunfight over this. Imagine someone coming back to their car and some dude has broken in. The dog's welfare won't enter the picture. It will be a car thief and a car owner with a carry permit.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Abdullah71601 is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 10:03 PM   #12
rr-nyc
Liar & Ratbag
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abdullah71601 View Post
Nice idea, but allowing citizens to damage property is ripe for abuse of the "good faith" requirement.

Call 911, cops will be there in 10 minutes to extract the pooch.
10 minutes? Assuming you live in an area where an officer can or will arrive in 10 minutes, that is could be a matter of life and death for a dog; not to mention torturing at that point.

I'm glad to see these laws getting passed. Personally, I do not need permission to smash a window to save a dog from dying in a locked car. I can live with any consequences that may come from it legally.

I did it once in Miami and would gladly do it again.
rr-nyc is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 11:06 PM   #13
Rolex addict
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
No good deed goes unpunished. There are steps laid out in the bill. Most people have cell phones and it would be wise to document (ie. take pictures and/or video) of the vehicle, tag, animal, etc. before calling 911. That is evidence which can be used in court later if needed.
Rolex addict is offline  
Old 25 May 2016, 11:29 PM   #14
andromeda160
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
apparently there's already a similar law in Michigan already. If I saw a dog in distress I wouldn't think twice about saving them reguardless of legality. I have a window breaker on my knife and obviously I'd check its locked first but just because animals are legally property, I don't think they should be treated as such.
andromeda160 is offline  
Old 26 May 2016, 04:48 AM   #15
ref1655
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: 1655/MkI
Posts: 1,100
absolutely...if one cannot responsibly or humanely take care of their pets and/or children, then they don't deserve to have them. period.

a broken car window can be easily repaired...in many cases, a life cannot.
ref1655 is offline  
Old 26 May 2016, 05:55 AM   #16
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,244
I think it's a good idea, personally I'd call 911 and monitor the dog, if the PD didn't show up by the point that I felt the animal was in danger then I'd do what I had to do.
Just before I retired I arrested a woman who let her dog die in her blistering hot car in a hospital parking lot. Horrible scene where the dog apparently tried to dig up under the seats either to find a cooler spot or was trying to dig his way out. The woman took a hearing, no deals that day,,, guilty as charged.
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline  
Old 26 May 2016, 09:30 PM   #17
CRM114
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
Extremely bad idea. Let the proper authorities handle it.

I've experienced far too many dog-owning nutters (the numbers of which seem to be growing) who have a very shaky grasp on reason and reality when it comes to animals. Those misanthrope-types go looking to play vigilante or one-upmanship when it comes to self-righteous "caring" about pets, and especially when trying to out-do each other. The last thing anyone needs is to give them legal free reign when it comes to destroying someone else's property based on how they feel at the moment.
CRM114 is offline  
Old 26 May 2016, 10:27 PM   #18
RichM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
RichM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 29,771
Not sure I like it. Let the authorities handle it. Call 911.

I could just see my wallet is missing, my cell phone, I kept $50 in the console, now it's gone. Let the police or fire handle it.
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day"
TRF #139960
RichM is offline  
Old 26 May 2016, 10:51 PM   #19
greggsiam
"TRF" Member
 
greggsiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Gregg
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 694
Quote:
The person must also have a "good faith belief" that the animal is in danger if they aren't removed immediately.
This is the bad part. There are too many emotional, nutcase pet owners that think a dog sitting in a car for 5 minutes gives them the right to smash a window. There's just too many people with poor judgement for me to trust a law like that. If an animal is truly in danger, the police can be called. It's their job. I don't want the crazy PETA lady smashing my window because my dog is sitting in my car on a 70f day for 15 minutes.
greggsiam is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 12:27 AM   #20
rr-nyc
Liar & Ratbag
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
TRF what do you guys think about this proposed law?

Quote:
Originally Posted by greggsiam View Post
This is the bad part. There are too many emotional, nutcase pet owners that think a dog sitting in a car for 5 minutes gives them the right to smash a window. There's just too many people with poor judgement for me to trust a law like that. If an animal is truly in danger, the police can be called. It's their job. I don't want the crazy PETA lady smashing my window because my dog is sitting in my car on a 70f day for 15 minutes.


Try sitting in your car with the window slightly cracked for 15min on a 70 degree day. Now imagine being a dog with fur and can't sweat to cool your body temperature.

From the AVMA:

The temperature inside your vehicle can rise almost 20º F in just 10 minutes. In 20 minutes, it can rise almost 30º F...and the longer you wait, the higher it goes. At 60 minutes, the temperature in your vehicle can be more than 40 degrees higher than the outside temperature. Even on a 70-degree day, that's 110 degrees inside your vehicle!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rr-nyc is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 12:37 AM   #21
rr-nyc
Liar & Ratbag
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by cop414 View Post
I think it's a good idea, personally I'd call 911 and monitor the dog, if the PD didn't show up by the point that I felt the animal was in danger then I'd do what I had to do.

Just before I retired I arrested a woman who let her dog die in her blistering hot car in a hospital parking lot. Horrible scene where the dog apparently tried to dig up under the seats either to find a cooler spot or was trying to dig his way out. The woman took a hearing, no deals that day,,, guilty as charged.

That's exactly what we did in Miami. I went from store to store in the immediate area and asked who had a dog in a white Toyota but nobody spoke up so I called 911 while my wife videotaped the dog panicking and struggling to get air since the window was barely cracked (85 degrees and very humid) After waiting 7 more minutes, I smashed the window and removed the dog while we waited for the police to arrive. 10 minutes later, an officer arrived with no sense of urgency. There is no doubt that this dog would have died in that time.

The owner showed up shortly after and was given a summons to appear and then left with the dog.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rr-nyc is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 01:34 AM   #22
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by greggsiam View Post
This is the bad part. There are too many emotional, nutcase pet owners that think a dog sitting in a car for 5 minutes gives them the right to smash a window. There's just too many people with poor judgement for me to trust a law like that. If an animal is truly in danger, the police can be called. It's their job. I don't want the crazy PETA lady smashing my window because my dog is sitting in my car on a 70f day for 15 minutes.
Gregg,

I get your point and generally agree with you.

Unfortunately, 70 is too warm to leave a dog unattended with windows merely cracked. I know it sounds crazy but studies have shown how quickly the temp rises and makes it hazardous for our furry friends. As such, my cutoff for this sort of behavior is 55-60 degrees and I crack the windows a healthy amount, enough my pooch can actually put her head out if she wanted.

Also, I only do this for 5 minuted run ins etc. 15 and I leave it running and locked ymmv
GB-man is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 01:48 AM   #23
RationalPragmatist
"TRF" Member
 
RationalPragmatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 500
Good one and let's lock up the moron owners in their car for an hour to help them understand their stupidity.
RationalPragmatist is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 03:08 AM   #24
skydriver
"TRF" Member
 
skydriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Larry
Location: Johns Creek, GA
Watch: GMT Pepsi
Posts: 251
Depends on how hot it is, how the dog looks, and how quick the police will be able to get there once you call them. But I am all for breaking a window to save a dog.
skydriver is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 01:33 PM   #25
68camaro
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA!
Posts: 862
Don't like it, call 911. How does someone know its been 2 minutes and I am walking back from car two rows over.

Wait till the first person does it to the wrong person, will not end well.
68camaro is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 01:59 PM   #26
threemonkeys
"TRF" Member
 
threemonkeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
In my personal experience, most people won't do a thing that involves sticking their neck out. You know - the 'someone else will take care of it' types. I've got great common sense and street smarts. And I'm just not wired for inaction. So if a pet were in great distress, I wouldn't hesitate to smash a window and ask questions later.
threemonkeys is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 02:15 PM   #27
goin camping
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Milo
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 922
Out here in Ca. There will be many do gooders busting windows regardless of the weather and even if the windows are partially down.

When it is 75 or below I leave my pups in the jeep for up to ten minutes with the windows open 5 or 6 inches. Not worried about car thieves as large GSD's tend to keep people honest.
goin camping is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 02:20 PM   #28
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by threemonkeys View Post
In my personal experience, most people won't do a thing that involves sticking their neck out. You know - the 'someone else will take care of it' types. I've got great common sense and street smarts. And I'm just not wired for inaction. So if a pet were in great distress, I wouldn't hesitate to smash a window and ask questions later.

I don't know how great common sense equates to destroying someone's property.

People all assume they will know that the pet is in great distress. But the definition of distress varies from person to person. You guys are trying to do the right thing, but you're not really qualified to make an informed decision on the health of the animal. We have service dogs here that work outside all day when it's 135 in the shade. They pant constantly, but they are healthy and well cared for by trained handlers. By your standards, the dogs wouldn't be allowed to work and their handlers sent to jail.

This law would be abused by activists, nut cases, and people with an ax to grind. The unintended consequence will be the death of some people when the inevitable conflict arises. Better to pass a law that prohibits pets in cars, then no one has the opportunity to abuse the animal.
Abdullah71601 is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 02:26 PM   #29
rr-nyc
Liar & Ratbag
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by 68camaro View Post
Don't like it, call 911. How does someone know its been 2 minutes and I am walking back from car two rows over.

Wait till the first person does it to the wrong person, will not end well.
Simple, if it's been only been two minutes, your dog won't appear to be fighting for it's life. There's a clear difference between a dog panting and one that is yelping in agony as it claws at the window trying to get the hell out.
rr-nyc is offline  
Old 27 May 2016, 02:42 PM   #30
Alexwwjd
"TRF" Member
 
Alexwwjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Texas
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 2,352
Totally agree with this law!
Alexwwjd is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.