ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 September 2016, 02:08 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Aris
Location: London, UK
Posts: 191
|
Rolex 16700 advice please
Hello all,
I have an opportunity to trade some pieces for a 16700 and finally experience my first Rolex. The watch has recently returned from service. I took some pictures of the lugs, case crown guards etc and I would really appreciate any comments or opinions. Thank you Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
20 September 2016, 02:14 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: California
Posts: 552
|
Hands and 24 hour hand have different patina then the dial lume markers. That would bother me but some others probably wouldn't care.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk |
20 September 2016, 02:17 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Aris
Location: London, UK
Posts: 191
|
Quote:
Thanks for that. I have noticed and the seller has been very upfront about that. These are replacement tritium ones that have not patinated in the same way. I am mostly concern about the case state polishing wise etc. Thank you! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
20 September 2016, 02:41 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,695
|
Looks like a nice watch. I see no issues other than the replacement hands which would not be a show stopper for me. I'd remove that sticker from the back, fwiw. That would bother me and it would definitely come off before the watch went on my wrist.
I love the 16700 as the last of the original GMTs; it provides me with just the perfect amount of information regarding time zones for travel. Look forward to the variations you can have with the watch. |
20 September 2016, 02:53 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Aris
Location: London, UK
Posts: 191
|
Rolex 16700 advice please
Quote:
Hello, Yours is very nice indeed. The hands are not a show stopper for me either. I am mostly concerned about the state of the upper right hand side lugg. The spring bar seems almost flush with the case which is not the same as the lower one. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
20 September 2016, 03:13 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
Hands would be a deal breaker for me unless the seller had the originals.
|
20 September 2016, 03:20 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
|
I'm not an authority on vintage Rolexes, but those lugs seem over-polished. Nothing to worry about from a function standpoint...just aesthetic.
As long as the seller is pricing it accordingly and you want it, I'd say go for it. If seller is asking as much as an untouched vintage piece then I'd look for something else. If you just want a nice Rolex to wear and enjoy and aren't planning to start a vintage collection then it might be the perfect piece.
__________________
Russ |
20 September 2016, 03:20 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
Unless the price is real low, and you really want it, I would pass. I would rather go for a 16710. A lot more of them in better conditions.
|
20 September 2016, 03:37 AM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,244
|
I agree with what the other members have said, in addition I'm not sure if the following mark on the hour hand is lighting, a fiber or possible damage from the back end of the second hand rubbing as it's rotating? Good luck.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
20 September 2016, 03:38 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Charlotte/London
Watch: Multiple
Posts: 889
|
Pretty watch! Looks like it's been polished but looks great...what advice are you looking for?
__________________
♕ Daytona - 116506 ♕ GMT-Master II - 116710BLNR ♕ Yacht-Master II - 116680 ♕ Daytona - 116520 ♕ Explorer II - 16570 |
20 September 2016, 04:09 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Aris
Location: London, UK
Posts: 191
|
|
21 September 2016, 07:05 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Quote:
Would agree - the 16700 is right up there with the 16710. Not really a great deal of difference other than the quick set date v independent hand - really just down to personal preference - both super watches! |
21 September 2016, 07:21 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: China
Watch: ExII & GMT Master
Posts: 334
|
Unless it is penny cheap, I would save your money and get a good example. You say it is just back from a service? Looks like it was done at a local fabricating shop. Pass
|
21 September 2016, 07:58 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
|
I agree with steve.r. I'm not certain what the lugs looked like originally on that reference for that serial, but I'm guessing the edges weren't nearly that rounded off. The case looks pretty rough, in my opinion. Unless you're getting a super great deal on it, I would hold out for a better example.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.