Tudor 'Big Block' 94210 from 1979

[yogiolie]

Anyone ever seen matching black subchrono hands on black subdials on
Tudor 'Big Block' 94210 from 1979 NO Oysterdate 'subtitle'?
Are the subchrono hands correct or replacements?
I have seen matching subhands on later models (with Oysterdate subtitle), but not on earlier models 94210 around 1976-1979 (NO Oysterdate subtitle). Maybe because this model is more rare and not seen very often in matching hands, i was hoping anyone has seen this rare combi or have photos from a brochure/ cataloque to confirm this combi is original and not fake.
Thank you for your kind help.

[Dan Pierce]

The dial w/ angled hour markers and date window surround indicates an early version. And I seem to remember "Oyster"less dials on the first Big Blocks but unfortunately I cannot confirm. No idea about the sub hands.
Hope it's confirmed legit. That would be a great rare piece.
Good luck,
dP

[rootbeer7]

are they definitely black, not blackened by time, or shot at a strange angle? Strange to put black on black?

[springer]

I have never seen that combination before. I would guess that the hands were changed at one time and they should be silver and not black.

Doing a quick internet search failed to show any 94210 chronos with the black hands/black sub-dial combinations.

https://www.google.com/search?q=tudo...w=1451&bih=652

[onkyo]

I too have never seen that combo. Most likely not original to the watch.

[sea-dweller]

Nice!