ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

scarlet knight · 6 November 2016, 08:07 AM

I had a Pam 005, but I am small and thin wristed, so I felt that it was too big for me. I do miss it.

Can anyone recommend a smaller (42?) Panerai at a reasonable cost?

DLCU2 · 6 November 2016, 08:10 AM

The PAM 392 is 42mm.

chimp98 · 6 November 2016, 08:24 AM

I have a gen Pam00048 that's 40mm and it wears perfectly for my small wrist.

If you're looking for a 42mm...I would recommend to look at the Pam 676 that just came out. However none of the TDs have the right starbusrt dial locked down to gen specs yet.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

Cru Jones · 6 November 2016, 08:40 AM

While the 392 is 42, it's still pretty thick.

Consider the 512 or 337.

nick c · 6 November 2016, 08:53 AM

Maybe find 40mm Pam

mscottmeller · 6 November 2016, 10:59 AM

512

mps354 · 6 November 2016, 10:59 AM

512 or 574

andy66db · 7 November 2016, 04:50 AM

The PAM 1392 is the new version of the 392, but with a thinner movement/case. The PAM 233, although 44mm, wears well on small wrists due to the thin case and you get a gorgeous dome crystal as well.

scarlet knight · 7 November 2016, 11:42 AM

Thanks for the recommendations!

Hey May · 10 November 2016, 03:51 AM

PAM523? or a 310 if you can find one - 676 is a neat one, very very light and thin

towernick · 10 November 2016, 09:05 AM

I just tried on a 512 and it was very nice.

ap1 · 10 November 2016, 12:49 PM

1392

scarlet knight · 11 November 2016, 02:49 AM

It looks like it's 40mm.

Psmith · 12 November 2016, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scarlet knight

It looks like it's 40mm.

It is -
http://www.panerai.com/en/collection...p=setTopSearch

Justice12 · 13 November 2016, 01:41 AM

512 is amazing, I'm mad I didn't jump on one I could have had for an amazing price in mint condition. Still kicking myself

6 November 2016, 08:07 AM	#1
scarlet knight "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Watch: Good ones Posts: 8,468	Recommended smaller Panerai I had a Pam 005, but I am small and thin wristed, so I felt that it was too big for me. I do miss it. Can anyone recommend a smaller (42?) Panerai at a reasonable cost?

6 November 2016, 08:10 AM	#2
DLCU2 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Lee Location: USA Watch: me go broke Posts: 131	The PAM 392 is 42mm. __________________ ♛Ω♛Ω♛Ω♛

6 November 2016, 08:24 AM	#3
chimp98 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Real Name: Huy Location: California Watch: FPJ Octa Lune Posts: 142	I have a gen Pam00048 that's 40mm and it wears perfectly for my small wrist. If you're looking for a 42mm...I would recommend to look at the Pam 676 that just came out. However none of the TDs have the right starbusrt dial locked down to gen specs yet. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk __________________ "The trouble is, you think you have time." - Buddha 2FA activated

10 November 2016, 12:49 PM	#12
ap1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,536	1392 Attached Images

11 November 2016, 02:49 AM	#13
scarlet knight "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Watch: Good ones Posts: 8,468	Thoughts on a PAM 48? It looks like it's 40mm.

6 November 2016, 08:40 AM	#4
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,297	While the 392 is 42, it's still pretty thick. Consider the 512 or 337.

6 November 2016, 08:53 AM	#5
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	Maybe find 40mm Pam

6 November 2016, 10:59 AM	#6
mscottmeller 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Boston Posts: 67	512

6 November 2016, 10:59 AM	#7
mps354 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: CT Posts: 9,097	512 or 574

7 November 2016, 04:50 AM	#8
andy66db "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: London, England Posts: 81	The PAM 1392 is the new version of the 392, but with a thinner movement/case. The PAM 233, although 44mm, wears well on small wrists due to the thin case and you get a gorgeous dome crystal as well.

7 November 2016, 11:42 AM	#9
scarlet knight "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Watch: Good ones Posts: 8,468	Thanks for the recommendations!

10 November 2016, 03:51 AM	#10
Hey May "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: South Florida Watch: Panerai/JLC Posts: 16	PAM523? or a 310 if you can find one - 676 is a neat one, very very light and thin

10 November 2016, 09:05 AM	#11
towernick Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 880	I just tried on a 512 and it was very nice.

13 November 2016, 01:41 AM	#15
Justice12 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Delaware Posts: 96	512 is amazing, I'm mad I didn't jump on one I could have had for an amazing price in mint condition. Still kicking myself

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)