ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 September 2008, 11:57 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Submariner Date
Posts: 822
|
Rolex moving to ceramic bezel inserts and polished center links...
What are your opinions on Rolex's slow move to ceramic bezel inserts and polished center links?
I prefer the current style bezel inserts and center links. I really dislike the ceramic and polished features and wish they'd let us choose.
__________________
"M" 16610 Submariner "M" 16570w Explorer II |
16 September 2008, 12:04 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
I seriously dislike polished center links, for me they take the watch from "tool" to "dress". I want a watch that is not flashy and can withstand whatever I throw at it, that is what made me a fan of Rolex in the first place. As far as Ceramic bezels, I am not sure yet, I have no complaints with the aluminium inserts and it is convenient to just go to your local AD and throw a new one in if you scratch yours. I don't particularly like to shine the ceramic bezels give off, but I really can't pass judgment yet because I have never owned a watch with a ceramic bezel.
I do agree with you though, polished likes have no business on sport watches.
__________________
My grails: |
16 September 2008, 12:10 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 109
|
i like the ceramics but i don't like the polished centers...
they can move to ceramics but the current combos of models/polished links are appropriate... stick to that. |
16 September 2008, 12:11 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 216
|
I like ceramic bezel, thats y i thought about gmt2c instead of sd.
I hate polished center links, thats y i bought sd instead of gmt2c. |
16 September 2008, 12:12 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Submariner Date
Posts: 822
|
What happens if you brush the polished center links with a Scotchbrite?
__________________
"M" 16610 Submariner "M" 16570w Explorer II |
16 September 2008, 01:00 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Quote:
A well-done example: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...racelet+116710
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
|
16 September 2008, 01:33 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 448
|
wouldn't this void the warranty?
|
16 September 2008, 01:51 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,092
|
|
16 September 2008, 01:55 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 943
|
i agree, polished bracelets
__________________
16610LV 16200 116600 116500 |
16 September 2008, 02:46 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
|
I agree also - polished center links are not my favorite. They are growing on me - I think the brushed bracelet is why I love my SD and Sub so much. A choice would be pretty cool. Although - some of the models may not look too good without the polished. A choice would be good.
__________________
Jackson |
16 September 2008, 03:37 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
|
I wonder how long the center links will stay shiny. My TT is not shiny at all any more but Millie is very shiny.
__________________
SS GMTII "D", TT GMTIIc "Z" |
16 September 2008, 04:11 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
I love the polished centre links and ceramic bezel. The GMT IIc is the nicest watch I own
|
16 September 2008, 05:18 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia/HK
Posts: 22
|
I think the polished center links look good on Daytona, because it is a dress watch. The sub & sea-dweller are meant to be a work horse, hence should always be brushed in my opinion...
|
16 September 2008, 05:22 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: steven
Location: tampa bay
Watch: 1680 18k sub
Posts: 6,672
|
I love the ceramic bezel-and the polished links arent bad either
|
16 September 2008, 05:38 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: Home and Away
Watch: you? "YES PLEASE"!
Posts: 3,719
|
I think go with the times, change is good!
__________________
it's not just about telling the time... happy rolexing... I'm just a man with a passion
|
16 September 2008, 06:39 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
|
I am with you Matthew. I prefer the current style bezel inserts and brushed bracelets. That being said, I actually don't mind the polished center links with my SS Daytona.
__________________
Adam |
16 September 2008, 07:22 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
|
I prefer brushed links on models like the Sub, SD, and Explorer II. Polished links do look pretty good on the YM and Daytona though, which are the more expensive models of the professional line in terms of MSRP.
On the GMT, I'm pretty torn in the middle between brushed and polished. They both look pretty good to me, its not like having polished links on it bothers me in any way. Also, brushed is a classic look on the GMT, so I'm still divided. With ceramic, its almost perfect except for the lack of a pepsi and coke bezel.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
16 September 2008, 08:42 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bård
Location: Oslo - Norway
Watch: None
Posts: 1,014
|
I like the polished center links and the ceramic bessel!
Yes, it makes it more of a dress-watch, but come on! Rolex haven't bin a "Tool-watch" for years. They are way too expensive for that and cheaper quartz-models are doing the "tool-job" better. So if you have a "Tool-watch" Rolex you may have a watch with the image of beeing a tool watch, but it's relly a "dress-watch".
__________________
Bård |
16 September 2008, 10:26 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
I didn't love polished center links at first, but they really matter little after you wear them for a few days. It certainly doesn't transform in into a Cellini or anything. You'd think them tantamount to diamond encrusting the way some think of them.
With respect to those that think otherwise, the prices of these babies has made the concept of a rough and tumble "tool" watch seem pretty silly. While I personally don't think of a SS Sub as a suit / tux watch, past history here on TRF proves many disagree. I guess that Rolex assessed the need to "dress" it up a tad bit to better fit in that role -- thus the polished the center links and maybe the new bezel. If what we've seen recently released and in the pipeline (GMT-IIC, Millie, new Subs, etc) is any indicator, you had better get used to it or buy some ScotchBrites. |
16 September 2008, 10:29 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
|
Once again Peter I have to 100% agree with what you say
__________________
"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.